anyone have info from buying GF chip for a 94 2.3 or any 2.3 for that fact

[94 lngbd]

I read there testimonials & with it having 100% no question asked guarantee I don't see how one can go wrong ,but I would like to see what another 2.3 owner has to say about performance & MPG increase

 

[straycat]

V6 swap is your best bet, Bro!!! Don't waist time on a chip for a 4 cyl.

 

[Mac]

Someone else was just asking aobut that brand last week so I did a Google and 90% said don't waste your time or money.
Dave of the Nord

 

[94 lngbd]

its just a temporary thing as eventually I will be have engine rebuilt for the purpose of having it Turbo charged which will be better then dealing with all the wiring & computer issues of swapping in a V-6. It will have the better 2.3 head from a 96 & 2.3 ford racing cam/roller conversion,which by it self is good for 40hp & about another 80-100hp from turbo.

Fuel economy of a 4 cyl & power of a V-8

 

[94 lngbd]

I goggled it also ,but was wondering if any ranger 2.3s had any input. And if its so bad why is it listed on TRS?

 

[shane96ranger]

Dave is right, there was a thread on this a few days ago. I found this video, and read this guys comments. Sounds like a POS to me.





In this video, it shows that it runs in parallel with the intake temp sensor. It's just a resistor that makes your computer think the intake temp is cooler than it actually is.

 

[heptofite]

don't get any of this bullshit 'chip' stuff.

if you're going for performance, go custom ECU, that's how you're going to make more power.

 

[stegomon]

wow that chip is awesome. almost as cool as the dc powered turbo. i almost thought i was watching that sham wow guy. such a good sales man. get one for my 56 chevy