• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

7.5" open to limited slip conversion?


They're not made for the 7.5...

Go get a LS out of a four cylinder Thunderbird Turbo-Coupe, Turbo Mustang or a Ranger/BII from the jy. Got mine outta TBird Turbo coupe for less than $50 and then had it rebuilt and installed with 4.10s. Put a few extra pre-load shims in the pack while you're at it. :)

EDIT: MAKG gave very good advice, unfortunately when I bought mine the coupel that I found were wore out so I had to rebuild it.
 
Last edited:
Go get a LS out of a four cylinder Thunderbird Turbo-Coupe, Turbo Mustang or a Ranger/BII from the jy. Got mine outta TBird Turbo coupe for less than $50 and then had it rebuilt and installed with 4.10s. Put a few extra pre-load shims in the pack while you're at it. :)

EDIT: MAKG gave very good advice, unfortunately when I bought mine the coupel that I found were wore out so I had to rebuild it.
I was saying the No-Slip isn't made for the 7.5...
 
I was saying the No-Slip isn't made for the 7.5...

the limited slip option is and was an option on ranger 7.5 rear ends.the break away torque makg listed at 25 ft/lbs differs from my shop manual.the ford shop manual for 1983 lists the break away torque at 30 ft/pounds.fwiw.
 
the limited slip option is and was an option on ranger 7.5 rear ends.the break away torque makg listed at 25 ft/lbs differs from my shop manual.the ford shop manual for 1983 lists the break away torque at 30 ft/pounds.fwiw.
Jesus, a No-slip is a LOCKER, not an LS, I know they made 7.5 LS, I had one, it sucked for wheeling.
 
so,get a locker and move on w/life.
 
so,get a locker and move on w/life.
I did, notice how I said "sucked" as in past tense. If people would read through the whole topic I wouldn't have to explain everything 4 times...
 
hate that you had to explain yourself 4 times,the pain ,the agony,the inhumanity.pardon me all to hell.
 
It's just common fucking courtesy to READ BEFORE you POST, otherwise forums get clogged up with useless, redundant info and that doesn't do anybody any good.
 
I have a factory LS in the 1999 Ranger. It has the 3.0L and a L/S. It works quite well. At least it is a hell of a lot easier to spin it in a circle in the snow.
 
Installing a locker for me would first require an upgrade to an 8.8" axle ($$$), then purchase and installation of a locker ($$$), and is probably overkill for my application, albeit better for pure traction.

I've decided to: 1) take whatever time is necessary to locate a 7.5" LS Bronco2 axle (not interested in re-welding mounts) close by (pick up myself, no shipping cost), rebuild the LS clutch and replace the seals etc. while it is off the vehicle, and then install it on my B2. This should be the best compromise for me between cost/amount of work, and desired traction performance.

Thanks again to all who replied, including PM's.
CraigK
 
now you're talking.i have similar plans in the future.from your original post it seems like the most cost effective option,good luck.
 
Last edited:
Installing a locker for me would first require an upgrade to an 8.8" axle ($$$), then purchase and installation of a locker ($$$), and is probably overkill for my application, albeit better for pure traction.

I've decided to: 1) take whatever time is necessary to locate a 7.5" LS Bronco2 axle (not interested in re-welding mounts) close by (pick up myself, no shipping cost), rebuild the LS clutch and replace the seals etc. while it is off the vehicle, and then install it on my B2. This should be the best compromise for me between cost/amount of work, and desired traction performance.

Thanks again to all who replied, including PM's.
CraigK
Lockers (lock-right) ARE made for the 7.5, the no-slip locker isn't made for the 7.5.
 
although i do believe the only *bolt in* for his b2 is another 7.5 form a b2. fairly certain the frame is slightly narrower so spring pads will need to be moved to use an axle form a Ranger. (there never were 8.8 stock in b2's was there??)

No, 8.8" rears were never factory installed in Bronco2's

And the Bronco2 frame is the same width as a Ranger frame.
The spring pad spacing on a Bronco2 axle is wider, but that is
because the rear spring mounts space the springs further outboard
from the frame (and lower eliminating the need for blocks like the
Ranger) The Bronco2 axle is also wider by 1-5/8".

the Explorer axle actually has the same spring spacing as the Ranger
axle, though on the explorer the pads are under the axle due to spring
setup.

the Explorer actually has a wider frame spacing, the explorer frame "flares out"
behind the transmission crossmember and the springs are mounted directly under the frame rail.

AD
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Ranger Adventure Video

TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Sponsors


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Sponsored Ad

Back
Top