- Joined
- Mar 23, 2009
- Messages
- 24
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Lancaster, Oh
- Vehicle Year
- 1988
- Transmission
- Automatic
2002 f-250 7.3L diesel ts chip, built auto, ball bearing turbo, 5" exhaust, afe intake, 35" mickey thompsons


Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register
for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
My nissan has a 3.3 v6 the 4.0 didnt come in till the 2nd gen
Ahhh...
I guess it would be slow then.
I can't keep Gen's apart. We have a '93 Pathfinder in the family--been passed around like the village bike. My dad has had it for several years because it's their only 4x4 up there in northern Iowa and my mom uses it in the winter to do visitations--she's a Lutheran minister. I towed things with it and it was fine--as long as you keep the tach at 4,000rpm.
The question was how can you afford to daily drive it. I drive 1,000 miles a month. If I had a 14mpg vehicle (which that isn't in town) I would pay $3,000/year in gas. I stopped daily driving my full-size and got the 39mpg Honda which would save me $1,900/year over a 14mpg truck--and probably well over $2,000 year if I drove yours. I drive my full-size about once a week now--and on trips when I have to haul shit across the country. The little car will have paid for itself by about New Years.
some friends of my family's all drive new duramaxes, and this year all 4 boys (1 dad and 3 sons) admitted to paying over $15000 in fuel EACH. NO TYPO. thats how you know you have too much ,money.
Seriously? I haven't even spent $1,200 on fuel this year, and that's through about 500 gallons of fuel, and around 8,000 miles. To spend that much money, figuring the average cost of diesel in the last year was $2.41, that means they'd have to have burned over 6200 gallons of diesel. Figure 14mpg average, that'd mean they drove 87,100 miles EACH.
I would really question these folks' credibility.
id agree, these new diesels out now adays with the DPF get HORRIBLE fuel milage, specially when there brand new and dont have any miles on them. i drove my company truck,, 08' ford f350 powerstroke 6.4 from indianapolis to tuscan, arizonia and averaged 6.5 mpg pulling a tandem axle inclosed with about 8k pounds in it.. the emissions crap is killing the new diesels fuel milage. in my 04; chevy duramax i get between 18-22 mpg
The lack of desire from the manufacturer to develop better engines is killing mileage. My one work truck, powered with a Volvo D13, is a 485 hp 6 cyl diesel and it gets that mileage pulling at 107k pounds total. Why can Volvo get that mileage while our Macks get 4 or so with the same Eaton-Fuller 10 spd?
Ever brake the tierods or axle shafts on that while pulling the sleds? Chevys and GMCs are infomaus for blowing out the front ends while pulling sleds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHJR0IqqKkc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxoAbEVqD9o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfauOXbqKLQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_PmoCSqRaw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT6Lqj-_eSo
The 2010 HD truck standards are very strict. Not much different than those on diesel light-duty trucks.Different emissions standards. In their defence, I have never heard of a Powerstroke get THAT bad of milage. It is usually about twice that, which isn't all that great either.
Ford is ditching the Navistar diesel in the near future anyway.
The 2010 HD truck standards are very strict. Not much different than those on diesel light-duty trucks.