2003 Lockout Hubs

hilbile · 10-22-2010, 02:41 PM

My father was kind enough to one up me after junking his van and getting an 03 Ranger FX4 with 95,000mi. He absolutly loves his truck but does not like the fact the front end is always spinning, shafts, front pumpkin, etc. He asked me, since he HATES technology, (will not own a cell-phone or comupter) to come on and see if I can find out if they make lockouts for this generation ranger. I did a search of the forums and had no luck. Doing a search online I had no luck either. Im assuming its a no but I wanted a second opinion, to make him happy.

LearjetMinako · 10-22-2010, 02:47 PM

To tell the truth, being live axle 4x4 is better. It is less parts or things to get messed up or go wrong. As long as the transfer case engages, the rest will follow. It does suck up a few .1 MPG's more, but its best to have the 4x4 system work when you need it the most.

exbass94 · 10-22-2010, 03:04 PM

http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...ad.php?t=92106

hilbile · 10-22-2010, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exbass94

http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...ad.php?t=92106

My forum search did not bring this thread up. Question answered. Thanks

10-22-2010, 02:41 PM	#1
hilbile Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Graf IA Year: 1988 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 177cid Class: 4x4 Used For: driving, hauling, towing Posts: 66 Rep Power: 8 iTrader: (0)	2003 Lockout Hubs My father was kind enough to one up me after junking his van and getting an 03 Ranger FX4 with 95,000mi. He absolutly loves his truck but does not like the fact the front end is always spinning, shafts, front pumpkin, etc. He asked me, since he HATES technology, (will not own a cell-phone or comupter) to come on and see if I can find out if they make lockouts for this generation ranger. I did a search of the forums and had no luck. Doing a search online I had no luck either. Im assuming its a no but I wanted a second opinion, to make him happy. __________________ JJS Jerseys Graf IA
	Tweet

10-22-2010, 02:47 PM	#2
LearjetMinako Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Moore, OK Year: 1996 Make: Ford Model: Ranger XLT Engine: 2.3L 140ci Class: 2WD Used For: Work & Daily Driver Posts: 2,184 Rep Power: 18 iTrader: (2)	To tell the truth, being live axle 4x4 is better. It is less parts or things to get messed up or go wrong. As long as the transfer case engages, the rest will follow. It does suck up a few .1 MPG's more, but its best to have the 4x4 system work when you need it the most. __________________ 1996 Ford Ranger XLT, 2.3L 130,xxx miles 2006 Kawasaki KLX250s, 250cc 8,xxx miles Honesty: Telling your girlfriend that she has small boobs comes at a price
	Tweet

10-22-2010, 03:04 PM	#3
exbass94 Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Guilford, CT Year: 2006, 1994 Make: Ford Model: Ranger, Explorer Engine: 4.0 SOHC, 4.0 OHV Class: 4x4 Used For: Pavement Poundin' Posts: 3,078 Rep Power: 21 iTrader: (0)	http://www.therangerstation.com/foru...ad.php?t=92106 __________________ 2006 Ford Ranger Sport 4x4 2-dr Extended Cab, 46k miles 1994 Ford Explorer Sport 2-dr 4x4, 179k miles
	Tweet

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode