| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Year: 1995, 89
Make: Ford, Nissan
Model: Ranger XLT, 240sx
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
So I've got a carbed 351 out of an '81 F250. But its got an auto on it. If I were to use the ZF does the shifter end up in a good location for the stock shift boot? It also has a manual Tcase on it which I understand to be a 1356; is this correct? Its my understanding that Tcase will bolt up to the ZF but the larger size of the case requires clearancing. How will the shifter assembly on that fit? The stock 1354 will not bolt to the ZF; correct? What needs to be done for the speedo situation? I'm just kinda weighing my options here guys. Thanks for any input in advance.
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Year: 1991
Make: Ford
Model: Exploer
Engine: 351
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
The shifter comes out of the trans tunnel forward of the stock ranger location near under the dash. Check to see if it IS a 1356 and not an NP208. If it is an NP208, you are in luck as this should fit with no frame clearancing. I just recently put in a 1356 in my Explorer and moved the tranny mount to the passenger side by 7/8" to give just enough clearance for the xfer case to frame rail. I still ground out the frame a litttle anyway. The speedo arrangement is the same as stock 1354 so that is a bolt on. As far as xfer case shifter location...I used a shifter for an NP208 from an '86 F150 with AOD. This shifter ended up in the lower left side of the removeable trans tunnel plate. I had to cut and re-weld the shifter handle as it was hanging right by my right leg originally.
A lot of work, but not too bad if you can cut and weld. Oh ya, I used a front driveshaft from a '97 up F150 with 4.6 and hydrid ujoint to diff. Rear shaft was shortened by 1.5". Moral of the story here is, definitely NOT a bolt in swap but very do-able with some patience and sweat. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Year: 1991
Make: Ford
Model: Exploer
Engine: 351
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 0 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
4 Low
![]() 4 High ![]() Drivers POV ![]() No Plate ![]() Tranny Mount moved over 7/8" to make room for 1356
__________________
'91 Explorer, 351 EFI Windsor swap with 4R70W and Baumann controller. 1356 manual transfer case. 2" body lift, 2" suspension lift. 33" Procomp Mud Terrains. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Osceola Mills, Pa
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 396W
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Posts: 1,111
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
I will have to get some pictures posted up for you. If you want to use a ZF you either need to install a body lift or fab a new trans tunnel. It will not fit nicely. I put a body lift on and I still had a spot that was pretty tight. You need the engine to sit as low as possible in the frame too. The shifter will need to be modified and the stock ranger boot won't work. It will be pointed toward the dash. I used an NP205 for stregnth and it happens to be smaller than both the NP208 and BW1356. With the NP205 you will need to grind a passage for the shift rail to clear on the tailshaft housing. The stock speedo stuff will work. If you decide to use a ZF it will be in your best interest to install the engine and trans already mated.
Matt
__________________
88 Ranger XLT 4x4, no drivetrain, no frame, nothing....new stroker, frame and drivetrain in the works |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#5 |
|
It's only money...
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Posts: 633
Rep Power: 10 ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
I'd really like to see those pics, mainly of the shifter positioning and of how the transmission sits in the tunnel.
__________________
Blue 93 Ranger 4.0L 4x4 5spd, 38.5's on 16x10's EB coils, 6" Skyjacker Leafs, Belltech 6400's, Bilstein 5150's Fullwidth D60, Lockright, 5.38's, Dedenbear C's 14BFF, 5.38's, Detroit, Disc Braked 3" B/L, Dual batteries, 9500lb winch, Bushwacker cutouts |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Year: 1995, 89
Make: Ford, Nissan
Model: Ranger XLT, 240sx
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
How far up under the dash does the ZF shifter come out? Is it something that is liveable or not really? Interested to see you pics Nitemare.
Is there a list of trucks that the 205 came in? OT, on a 302,T5 setup where does the shifter come out? |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: C. Wisconsin
Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT Ext Cab
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Street
Used For: Summer Beater
Posts: 4,396
Rep Power: 55 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
With the T-5, the shifter comes out about 6-7 back from the stock location.
Dave - two hours North of you. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Osceola Mills, Pa
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 396W
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Posts: 1,111
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
I will have pics today. The ZF shifter comes out pretty close to the dash. I cut and rewelded the bottom of the shifter where it bolts to the trans to fix this problem. If I didn't 1st, 3rd and 5th wouldn't be used. I forget the exact years of the NP205 but you are pretty much guranteed to see it in a 70's 4x4 Ford. The era is late 60's or so to the early 80's. It's very common but be sure to read the ID tag so you don't get a NP203. They are quite massive. The T5 setup the shifter comes out right in front of the set. 2nd, 4th and reverse will just hit the seat.
Matt
__________________
88 Ranger XLT 4x4, no drivetrain, no frame, nothing....new stroker, frame and drivetrain in the works |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Year: 1995, 89
Make: Ford, Nissan
Model: Ranger XLT, 240sx
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Okay cool. Fabbing on the shifter doesn't bother me. What I'm really interested to know is how far forward of the stock console does it protrude from the floor?
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Osceola Mills, Pa
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 396W
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Posts: 1,111
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
Excuse the mess in there I need to get my wires looking nice yet; I just moved the MSD from the engine bay to the inside. Here are some pics.
Here's 1st gear ![]() Reverse 1st gear top view ![]() Why you need a body lift ![]() Matt
__________________
88 Ranger XLT 4x4, no drivetrain, no frame, nothing....new stroker, frame and drivetrain in the works |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Year: 1995, 89
Make: Ford, Nissan
Model: Ranger XLT, 240sx
Posts: 135
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Thanks for the pics. So, does anyone know if on a 95 are the firewall to stock shifter dimensions the same as an 88? Body lift makes sense. I'm putting one on currently. But why not help by cutting that massive semi-triangular tab off?
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Osceola Mills, Pa
Year: 1988
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 396W
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Posts: 1,111
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
I would believe those measurements are about the same. Maybe a little less room because that dash is bigger. The big tab on the trans isn't the only part that hits just the one that I can snap a picture of. The bellhousing is massive and the top of the transmission is massive.
ZF beside a M5ODR2 ![]() Matt
__________________
88 Ranger XLT 4x4, no drivetrain, no frame, nothing....new stroker, frame and drivetrain in the works |
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|