Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Truck Discussions > General Discussions

Notices

General Discussions This forum is for general discussions. Place posts that don't fit in any other forums here.

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2010, 06:36 AM   #1
kimcrwbr1
Member
 
kimcrwbr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: maplevalley WA

Year: 1983
Make: ford
Model: ranger
Engine: 2.8l
Class: 2WD street
Used For: DD tow boat

Posts: 4,649
Rep Power: 19
kimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nice
iTrader: (0)
Default synthetic or not

I put this engine in 5 years ago out of the bone yard and did the duraspark conversion with valve guide seals and she actually holds oil now. Would it be wise to put synthetic oil in a older 2.8 and what type of oil is the best and the best filter. I put about 1500 miles since the conversion and oil change with zero problems and running valvoline 10/30 now with a fram filter.tks Kim
__________________
it takes a nickle to go first class
when it stops hurting it will feel alot better
kimcrwbr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 12:55 PM   #2
strvger
Member
 
strvger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: the land of 2 seasons-Winter and getting ready for Winter!

Year: 1983
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger reg cab, short bed
Engine: 2.8
Class: 4x4
Used For: getting the job done, no matter what that job is.

Posts: 3,012
Rep Power: 16
strvger will become famous soon enoughstrvger will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (4)
Default

there are a number of threads here. all of them rate the Fram as the worst filter you can buy. Motorcraft, Purolator, NAPA Gold, and others all rate much better. think you'll find that the K&N filters aren't worth their price tag.
if you have no leaks, full synthetic should be ok. i always use a semi-synthetic for mine, but i haven't done the valve seals yet (latter this summer for sure!). typically 5W30 for winter and 10W40 for summer driving. i'm thinking of trying the Lucas additive once the valve seals are done. heard lots of good things about it. search for the threads and you should have all the info you need... imho.
__________________
1983 Ranger, ds'd 2.8 V6, 5 spd, 4x4, 2in bl, 31" TreadWright's, 4.56 gears, rear Detroit, aux gas tank

"Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid"... the Duke
strvger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 01:29 PM   #3
exbass94
Member
 
exbass94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Guilford, CT

Year: 2006, 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Explorer
Engine: 4.0 SOHC, 4.0 OHV
Class: 4x4
Used For: Pavement Poundin'

Posts: 3,076
Rep Power: 21
exbass94 is just really niceexbass94 is just really niceexbass94 is just really niceexbass94 is just really nice
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via AIM to exbass94
Default

If you want to use synthetic, go ahead and use it. Don't believe all the myths that it will screw up your engine. It's just oil. But, you need to ask yourself what you're hoping to accomplish by using it. Unless you want to extend your drain intervals, or put a lot of stress on the engine, or drive in extreme temperatures, it's probably not that necessary.

And I do not recommend additives. I wouldn't put that Lucas crap in my lawnmower.
__________________
2006 Ford Ranger Sport 4x4 2-dr Extended Cab, 45k miles
1994 Ford Explorer Sport 2-dr 4x4, 178k miles
exbass94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 02:37 PM   #4
kimcrwbr1
Member
 
kimcrwbr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: maplevalley WA

Year: 1983
Make: ford
Model: ranger
Engine: 2.8l
Class: 2WD street
Used For: DD tow boat

Posts: 4,649
Rep Power: 19
kimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nicekimcrwbr1 is just really nice
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strvger View Post
there are a number of threads here. all of them rate the Fram as the worst filter you can buy. Motorcraft, Purolator, NAPA Gold, and others all rate much better. think you'll find that the K&N filters aren't worth their price tag.
if you have no leaks, full synthetic should be ok. i always use a semi-synthetic for mine, but i haven't done the valve seals yet (latter this summer for sure!). typically 5W30 for winter and 10W40 for summer driving. i'm thinking of trying the Lucas additive once the valve seals are done. heard lots of good things about it. search for the threads and you should have all the info you need... imho.
Hey thanks I put 10/40 castrol and a motorcraft filter in and am getting around 5-10 lbs more pressure and the power seems better less on the foot feed. I did the duraspark and valve guide seals huge difference on overall performance and I no longer have to wait to start it if someone is by the tail pipe he he (puff of black smoke). The only downfall is I have to get rid of more oil now it actually holds it. But I think I can get used to it
__________________
it takes a nickle to go first class
when it stops hurting it will feel alot better
kimcrwbr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 05:11 PM   #5
strvger
Member
 
strvger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: the land of 2 seasons-Winter and getting ready for Winter!

Year: 1983
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger reg cab, short bed
Engine: 2.8
Class: 4x4
Used For: getting the job done, no matter what that job is.

Posts: 3,012
Rep Power: 16
strvger will become famous soon enoughstrvger will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (4)
Default

glad to hear it worked out so well for you!
__________________
1983 Ranger, ds'd 2.8 V6, 5 spd, 4x4, 2in bl, 31" TreadWright's, 4.56 gears, rear Detroit, aux gas tank

"Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid"... the Duke
strvger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 05:18 PM   #6
Mac
Premium Member

 
Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: C. Wisconsin

Year: 2003
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT Ext Cab
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Street
Used For: Summer Beater

Posts: 4,398
Rep Power: 55
Mac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond reputeMac has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: (2)
Default

Still wondering just who rates the Fram filter as being bad other than as said a "Lot of threads" say so. Anyone have some actual proof to back up those statements? Seen a lot of statements by some backyard "know-it-all" and in "His oppion, they are junk" just by looking at them.
Dave
Mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 06:05 PM   #7
LearjetMinako
Member
 
LearjetMinako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma City, OK

Year: 1996
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 2.3L 140ci
Class: 2WD
Used For: Work & Daily Driver

Posts: 2,180
Rep Power: 18
LearjetMinako has a spectacular aura aboutLearjetMinako has a spectacular aura aboutLearjetMinako has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: (2)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac View Post
Still wondering just who rates the Fram filter as being bad other than as said a "Lot of threads" say so. Anyone have some actual proof to back up those statements? Seen a lot of statements by some backyard "know-it-all" and in "His oppion, they are junk" just by looking at them.
Dave
Buy one and cut it open. You'll find that Fram uses a cardboard backing to the filter media, which is acceptable to tearing and letting the oil by-pass the filter. Most all other filters use a stamped metal filter media backing. Also, Fram uses less filter media than most others. On their PH8, the media is like 190 sq". While a PureOne or Motorcraft filter is 400 sq". More media for better filteration and longer life.

Now as for Fram motorcycle oil filters. They are actually pretty good and use a stamped metal backing.
__________________
1996 Ford Ranger XLT, 2.3L 130,xxx miles
2006 Kawasaki KLX250s, 250cc 8,xxx miles

Honesty: Telling your girlfriend that she has small boobs comes at a price
LearjetMinako is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:28 PM   #8
JohnnyO
Clean And Articulate
 
JohnnyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Year: 2008
Make: Ford
Model: Sport Trac
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: Daily Driver

Posts: 3,766
Rep Power: 10
JohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to beholdJohnnyO is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: (1)
Default

Newer oils have less zinc so as not to contaminate the cats. On an older engine I would say use a diesel-spec oil because they have more zinc, which flat tappet engines like a 2.8 like better. Shell Rotella 5w-40 synthetic is an excellent oil and doesn't cost a lot either. I would use a Motorcraft or NAPA Gold or Wix filter.
__________________
Steeler Nation does not have to travel. We're already there.
"It is not the multitude of ale houses that occasions a general disposition toward drunkenness among the common people; but rather disposition arising from other causes necessarily gives employment to a multitude of ale houses." -- Adam Smith, 1776
JohnnyO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:38 PM   #9
adsm08
Tracked and Locked

Asteroids Champion
 
adsm08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northumberland, PA

Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 2.9 High Performance
Class: 4x4
Used For: Elevenses

Posts: 18,629
Rep Power: 93
adsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond reputeadsm08 has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: (13)
Send a message via AIM to adsm08
Default

I run an FL-1A, 4 qts Castrol High Mileage 10-30 conventional, and 1 qt Lucas.

@ Exbass:

I don't usually recommend oil additives either, but in older engines the Lucas is nice. My 2.9 will smoke, chatter, and have low power on 5 qts oil. On the 4:1 Oil/Lucas, good power, no smoke, and even the 2.9 tick goes away, along with the rest of the valve train chatter.

I know that means I have bigger issues, but it works for now, and the 2.9 is getting replaced in a year or two and I can't afford to have it down long enough to tear that far into the engine.
__________________
Project: Hillbilly Deluxe

Project: Amazing Grace

Project: 12-Volt Sandwich

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raj
What you need is cheat codes, motor skills, and a magic genie who grants wishes to little boys who suck at Mario Kart
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Adams
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

HELP REPEAL OBAMACARE

Looking for 95-98 manual trans pedal bracket. Conducting an experiment for the betterment of all Ranger-kind.
adsm08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 01:09 AM   #10
chazzone
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Camby, IN

Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Broncco II
Engine: 2.9
Class: 4x4
Used For: Everything

Posts: 319
Rep Power: 11
chazzone will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyO View Post
Newer oils have less zinc so as not to contaminate the cats. On an older engine I would say use a diesel-spec oil because they have more zinc, which flat tappet engines like a 2.8 like better. Shell Rotella 5w-40 synthetic is an excellent oil and doesn't cost a lot either. I would use a Motorcraft or NAPA Gold or Wix filter.
What he said. Lack of zinc is a real problem with engine life, and especially cams.

Rotella synthetic 5W-40 is simply one of the best oils you can use, and when you consider the price, it may be the best hands down.
__________________
'89 EB BroncoII, 2" body/3" suspension lift by Duff. D35 front/8.8 rear swap, Camcraft cam, Pacesetter headers, 4.0 radiator,P235 75 15 Michellin LTX
chazzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2010, 09:50 AM   #11
strvger
Member
 
strvger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: the land of 2 seasons-Winter and getting ready for Winter!

Year: 1983
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger reg cab, short bed
Engine: 2.8
Class: 4x4
Used For: getting the job done, no matter what that job is.

Posts: 3,012
Rep Power: 16
strvger will become famous soon enoughstrvger will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (4)
Default

just be sure you check the Rotella jug closely. they put 4 qts in theirs and the engine with filter needs 5 qts. that happened to me a few months ago. i think it was their regular oil, so the synthetic might be different for the amount in the jug.
__________________
1983 Ranger, ds'd 2.8 V6, 5 spd, 4x4, 2in bl, 31" TreadWright's, 4.56 gears, rear Detroit, aux gas tank

"Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid"... the Duke
strvger is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles