November 2009 Off Road Truck Of The Month

**Jim Oaks** · 12-04-2009, 10:53 PM

Owner: BIGBLOCK44RANGER
Vehicle: 1991 Ford Ranger
Specifications: 1977 Ford F-150 frame, 8-inch Skyjacker springs, Rockwell 2.5 ton axles with disc brakes, 557 cid big block Ford, winch, and more.

For more details click HERE.

rangertoy · 12-04-2009, 11:04 PM

Congratulations!!

railman · 12-04-2009, 11:15 PM

congrats....couldn't have gone to a more deserving truck

l8r, John

MountainMike · 12-05-2009, 12:10 AM

Congrats! I can't beleive I never noticed the side pipes until now.

**RangerSVT** · 12-05-2009, 02:14 PM

Congratulations

SVT

94Blazer · 12-07-2009, 12:09 PM

Sweet! Grats BB44

ranerjunkie03 · 12-07-2009, 08:39 PM

very very very well done and in no way shape or form (excuse my expression) negro rigged..

BIGBLOCK44RANGER · 12-08-2009, 08:13 AM

thanks alot people. It's gettin some changes soon. A couple more million dollars and it'll be done. lol

Slipknotyk · 12-09-2009, 05:21 PM

Love the truck man.

I'm hoping to do my 97 a little differently, but Idk if the axles I plan to use will hold.

I'm planning to use a 351 bored and stroked to a 408, supercharged with a dual quad carb setup, with Cleveland heads ported and polished. It should be in the neighborhood of 750 HP, 870 TQ. Will a Rockwell rear and Dana 60 hold against that power, if I choose to use a doubler? Or am I going to need a Rockwell in the front?

do you know anything about narrowing those axles because i prefer not to have 12 inches of tire outside the wheel well.

94Blazer · 12-09-2009, 05:44 PM

Flip the hubs in on the rockwells to narrow them.
750 hp....Whichever you choose to use will need upgraded shafts
I wouldnt run a rock rear and 60 front. Choose one or the other , rocks or 1 tons
I wheel with BB44 and Ive seen him git on it pretty hard on occasion and he hasnt broken anything yet with rocks and the 557, but its no 750 hp motor.
Dual quads will get you in trouble in the woods . Mud is a different story.
I run 1 tons with SBC thats desktoped at over 400 horsys and I havent thrown any major parts out from under it yet. I have grenaded a few NP208's before I upgraded to the 205 setup. My 2 cents , hope it helps your decision

BIGBLOCK44RANGER · 12-09-2009, 08:37 PM

listen to blazer, if you wanna ride the street rockwells are not for you. even w/44s the 6.71 gear ratio sucks. the shafts are stronger than 60s but not stronger than cromo 60s.

as far as a rockwell rear and 60 front, they don't mix. Plus I dont think you can even get 60f 6.71 gears.

**doorgunner** · 12-12-2009, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGBLOCK44RANGER

thanks alot people. It's gettin some changes soon. A couple more million dollars and it'll be done. lol

Congrats BB44R......well put !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

12-04-2009, 10:53 PM	#1
Jim Oaks Building another truck Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Salem, Ohio Year: 1983 & 1996 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 5.0 / 4.0 Class: 4x4 Used For: Dedicated trail rig! Posts: 6,051 Rep Power: 10 iTrader: (0)	November 2009 Off Road Truck Of The Month Owner: BIGBLOCK44RANGER Vehicle: 1991 Ford Ranger Specifications: 1977 Ford F-150 frame, 8-inch Skyjacker springs, Rockwell 2.5 ton axles with disc brakes, 557 cid big block Ford, winch, and more. For more details click HERE. __________________ Some people are like slinkies -- not much good for anything, but they bring a smile to your face when pushed down the stairs. Check out my Blue Oval Militia Profile HERE Follow Me Vote For TRS In Top 4x4 Sites
	Tweet

12-04-2009, 11:04 PM	#2
rangertoy Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Soso, MS Year: 1999 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 3.0 Class: 4x4 Extreme Used For: anything that gets in the way Posts: 248 Rep Power: 9 iTrader: (1)	Congratulations!! __________________ 1999 Ranger with a few bolt ons
	Tweet

12-04-2009, 11:15 PM	#3
railman December 2011 OTOTM Winner Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Madisonville, KY Year: 1996 Make: Ford Model: Ranger SC 4X4 Engine: 4.0 Class: 4x4 Extreme Used For: everything Posts: 2,623 Rep Power: 15 iTrader: (2)	congrats....couldn't have gone to a more deserving truck l8r, John __________________ SAS with leaves, KP HP D60 front, D60 FF rear, 4.88's, 39.5x13.50x17" Bias Iroks, 17" Allied Beadlocks, winch, and a few dents and scratches......
	Tweet

12-05-2009, 02:14 PM	#5
RangerSVT Oct 09 OTOTM Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: TRS since 2002 - NW TN Year: 1996 Make: Ford Model: Ranger SC 4x4 Engine: GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC Class: 4x4 EXTREME DD Used For: Anger Management Posts: 6,000 Rep Power: 27 iTrader: (29)	Congratulations SVT __________________ *Member of the Turkey Bay Crew* *SVT Build Thread (96 V8 Ranger)* ST Build Thread (02 V8 Sport Trac) *V8 swap Club/Info*
	Tweet

12-07-2009, 12:09 PM	#6
94Blazer New Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Year: 82 Make: Chevy Model: K5/S10 Blazer contraption Engine: Tree fidy fi Class: 4x4 Extreme Used For: Turning heads and Droppin panties Posts: 5 Rep Power: 0 iTrader: (0)	Sweet! Grats BB44 __________________ Toyota Hater
	Tweet

12-07-2009, 08:39 PM	#7
ranerjunkie03 New Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: everson washington Year: 1992 Make: ranger Model: stx Engine: 2.9 Class: 4x4 extreme Used For: it works... on most weekends.. Posts: 24 Rep Power: 0 iTrader: (0)	very very very well done and in no way shape or form (excuse my expression) negro rigged.. __________________ megan fox is my girlfriend.... she just dont know it yet ainte much but here ya go... http://www.cardomain.com/id/rangerjunkie03
	Tweet

12-08-2009, 08:13 AM	#8
BIGBLOCK44RANGER Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: AL Year: 1991 Make: ford Model: ranger Used For: killin time and my wallet... Posts: 50 Rep Power: 10 iTrader: (0)	thanks alot people. It's gettin some changes soon. A couple more million dollars and it'll be done. lol
	Tweet

12-09-2009, 05:21 PM	#9
Slipknotyk New Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Denver Year: 1997 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 4.0 Class: 4x4 Used For: work & play Posts: 23 Rep Power: 0 iTrader: (0)	Love the truck man. I'm hoping to do my 97 a little differently, but Idk if the axles I plan to use will hold. I'm planning to use a 351 bored and stroked to a 408, supercharged with a dual quad carb setup, with Cleveland heads ported and polished. It should be in the neighborhood of 750 HP, 870 TQ. Will a Rockwell rear and Dana 60 hold against that power, if I choose to use a doubler? Or am I going to need a Rockwell in the front? do you know anything about narrowing those axles because i prefer not to have 12 inches of tire outside the wheel well.
	Tweet

12-09-2009, 05:44 PM	#10
94Blazer New Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Year: 82 Make: Chevy Model: K5/S10 Blazer contraption Engine: Tree fidy fi Class: 4x4 Extreme Used For: Turning heads and Droppin panties Posts: 5 Rep Power: 0 iTrader: (0)	Flip the hubs in on the rockwells to narrow them. 750 hp....Whichever you choose to use will need upgraded shafts I wouldnt run a rock rear and 60 front. Choose one or the other , rocks or 1 tons I wheel with BB44 and Ive seen him git on it pretty hard on occasion and he hasnt broken anything yet with rocks and the 557, but its no 750 hp motor. Dual quads will get you in trouble in the woods . Mud is a different story. I run 1 tons with SBC thats desktoped at over 400 horsys and I havent thrown any major parts out from under it yet. I have grenaded a few NP208's before I upgraded to the 205 setup. My 2 cents , hope it helps your decision __________________ Toyota Hater
	Tweet

12-09-2009, 08:37 PM	#11
BIGBLOCK44RANGER Junior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: AL Year: 1991 Make: ford Model: ranger Used For: killin time and my wallet... Posts: 50 Rep Power: 10 iTrader: (0)	listen to blazer, if you wanna ride the street rockwells are not for you. even w/44s the 6.71 gear ratio sucks. the shafts are stronger than 60s but not stronger than cromo 60s. as far as a rockwell rear and 60 front, they don't mix. Plus I dont think you can even get 60f 6.71 gears.
	Tweet

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode