Stan Myers

reno · 07-12-2008, 07:33 AM

What about his invention? I found a video of him putting nothing but water into a engine, and talking about it, ANY water will work whether it be fresh water or salt water. If he drove from L.A. to New York, he would use 22 gals of water...22 Gallons!!!! his work has to be known by someone else. Why are we not utilizing this technology? Can someone please explain this?

I am not making claims, but it apparently worked, and if so, why not use it? I am still looking up Stan Myers, but it seems there are a lot of tin foil hat sites out there on him and his death, so I will not trust anything they have to say about his invention. I would like I honest, straight to the point answer\discussion on this.

Here is the youtube video I watched... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIgOn1kRw5s

**MAKG** · 07-12-2008, 09:36 AM

Stan Meyer was a scam artist, plain and simple.

He even lost a lawsuit for fraud.

It is a CLASSIC perpetual motion machine. If you aren't screaming BULLSHIT at the top of your lungs over that, you really need another hobby. You just weren't cut out for this.

The claim, in a nutshell, says you can run your car forever with a single car battery. If you withhold judgment on that, you're FAR beyond help. It's wild bullshit.

There is nothing magic about technology. Take a physics class before wasting everyone's time over this bullshit again. You NEED it. Desperately. This one was extremely obvious. It only "apparently" worked if your brain is turned off. People sometimes LIE for money.

reno · 07-12-2008, 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAKG

Stan Meyer was a scam artist, plain and simple.

He even lost a lawsuit for fraud.

It is a CLASSIC perpetual motion machine. If you aren't screaming BULLSHIT at the top of your lungs over that, you really need another hobby. You just weren't cut out for this.

The claim, in a nutshell, says you can run your car forever with a single car battery. If you withhold judgment on that, you're FAR beyond help. It's wild bullshit.

There is nothing magic about technology. Take a physics class before wasting everyone's time over this bullshit again. You NEED it. Desperately. This one was extremely obvious. It only "apparently" worked if your brain is turned off. People sometimes LIE for money.

hold on now makg, that is what starts the arguments with us, I said I am not making any claims. I repeated what was said, and wanted a non tin foil answer. Then you come here blasting me again. That is what I have been trying to tell you for so long, it is the way you answer sometimes. Back off a little. Man I even tried to put the extra info in there to indicate that I just wanted an answer on this from other than tin foil hat people, not ridiculed and be littled.

If you can't answer decently, then please don't bother. That is what sets me off. I don't see why I need a physics course when this is a DISCUSSION board, so we can't ask questions and wonder about something? Damn I'm sorry I even try around here with occasional jerks like you.

See-Ya!

**MAKG** · 07-12-2008, 11:52 AM

Your bullshit filter is turned off.

Please don't rationalize that.

You're picking random statements and asking people to discuss it. If it weren't random, that would be useful.

Just because you want something to be so, doesn't make it so. And in this case, you would have found quite a lot more than just conspiracy theories had you been looking for them. It's quite obvious you weren't.

EVERY time someone makes a too-good-to-be-true statement, look a little deeper than the surface to see if there is anything there. In this case, there is absolutely no basis in fact, and quite a number of reasons to think it's a scam. Including records of a court case where it was PROVEN to be a scam.

Discussing alternatives has its uses, but that's not what this is. The BS filters are completely off, so it's random statements. I.e., noise.

When you repeat someone's claims asking everyone to disprove it, like it or not, you ARE endorsing them.

Boggin · 07-16-2008, 12:07 PM

is this how reno left the site?

**AllanD** · 07-16-2008, 01:35 PM

Yep.

Good riddance.

AD

philzilla · 07-16-2008, 01:56 PM

he really left ? oh well, no more discussions on "HHO" or other random crap that doesn't work

**AllanD** · 07-17-2008, 10:49 AM

Hey! with Reno Gone can we ELIMINATE this entire forum?

AD

philzilla · 07-18-2008, 04:50 AM

true, half the threads were started by him and there are almost all the same thing, i think he had a hard time getting it

Boggin · 07-20-2008, 09:23 PM

I liked the guy, though he did make a few too many threads

**Sunk** · 07-21-2008, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boggin-B-Series

I liked the guy, though he did make a few too many threads

KELLY88 · 07-21-2008, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boggin-B-Series

I liked the guy, though he did make a few too many threads

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sunk

X2. This statement coming from Boggin.

I gotta give Reno a little credit, at least he had an open mind. Instead of sitting back and bitching about our energy situation like most do at least he tried to get out there and look for something else. Sure it didn't work but at least an attempt was made, more than can be said for most people.

07-12-2008, 07:33 AM	#1
reno Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 641 Rep Power: 12 iTrader: (2)	Stan Myers What about his invention? I found a video of him putting nothing but water into a engine, and talking about it, ANY water will work whether it be fresh water or salt water. If he drove from L.A. to New York, he would use 22 gals of water...22 Gallons!!!! his work has to be known by someone else. Why are we not utilizing this technology? Can someone please explain this? I am not making claims, but it apparently worked, and if so, why not use it? I am still looking up Stan Myers, but it seems there are a lot of tin foil hat sites out there on him and his death, so I will not trust anything they have to say about his invention. I would like I honest, straight to the point answer\discussion on this. Here is the youtube video I watched... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIgOn1kRw5s
	Tweet

07-12-2008, 09:36 AM	#2
MAKG RBV Technical Advisor Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: California central coast Year: 1991 Make: Ford Model: Explorer Engine: 4.0L Class: 4x4 Posts: 4,643 Rep Power: 21 iTrader: (0)	Stan Meyer was a scam artist, plain and simple. He even lost a lawsuit for fraud. It is a CLASSIC perpetual motion machine. If you aren't screaming BULLSHIT at the top of your lungs over that, you really need another hobby. You just weren't cut out for this. The claim, in a nutshell, says you can run your car forever with a single car battery. If you withhold judgment on that, you're FAR beyond help. It's wild bullshit. There is nothing magic about technology. Take a physics class before wasting everyone's time over this bullshit again. You NEED it. Desperately. This one was extremely obvious. It only "apparently" worked if your brain is turned off. People sometimes LIE for money. __________________ 1990 VW Jetta GL, 1.8L 8V gasoline engine, manual transmission, painted in oxidized red paint and ponderosa pine sap, unknown mileage. 1991 Exploder, 4.0L, M5OD-R1 manual transmission, electronic BW1354 transfer case, 3.54 gears, 31 inch tires, icky two-tone blue paint with little clear coat, 230K miles. 1972 Chevy C-10, 250 I-6, SM465 (2WD) four-on-the-floor, 3.73 gears in a GM 12-bolt, puke green with a white cab. The "4 wheeled trash can," with x70K miles. x is probably 2.
	Tweet

07-12-2008, 11:52 AM	#4
MAKG RBV Technical Advisor Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: California central coast Year: 1991 Make: Ford Model: Explorer Engine: 4.0L Class: 4x4 Posts: 4,643 Rep Power: 21 iTrader: (0)	Your bullshit filter is turned off. Please don't rationalize that. You're picking random statements and asking people to discuss it. If it weren't random, that would be useful. Just because you want something to be so, doesn't make it so. And in this case, you would have found quite a lot more than just conspiracy theories had you been looking for them. It's quite obvious you weren't. EVERY time someone makes a too-good-to-be-true statement, look a little deeper than the surface to see if there is anything there. In this case, there is absolutely no basis in fact, and quite a number of reasons to think it's a scam. Including records of a court case where it was PROVEN to be a scam. Discussing alternatives has its uses, but that's not what this is. The BS filters are completely off, so it's random statements. I.e., noise. When you repeat someone's claims asking everyone to disprove it, like it or not, you ARE endorsing them. __________________ 1990 VW Jetta GL, 1.8L 8V gasoline engine, manual transmission, painted in oxidized red paint and ponderosa pine sap, unknown mileage. 1991 Exploder, 4.0L, M5OD-R1 manual transmission, electronic BW1354 transfer case, 3.54 gears, 31 inch tires, icky two-tone blue paint with little clear coat, 230K miles. 1972 Chevy C-10, 250 I-6, SM465 (2WD) four-on-the-floor, 3.73 gears in a GM 12-bolt, puke green with a white cab. The "4 wheeled trash can," with x70K miles. x is probably 2.
	Tweet

07-16-2008, 12:07 PM	#5
Boggin Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Model: 89 bronco ii Class: 4x4 Used For: going inappropriate places Posts: 5,722 Rep Power: 29 iTrader: (4)	is this how reno left the site? __________________ 97 Jeep TJ. 6" lift and 33's. 79 F150, restoring. 90 Mustang 5.0L sold: 89 BII, lifted, bumpers, winch, and stuff "Dont know how to drive automatic"- Chance. RIP Buddy.
	Tweet

07-16-2008, 01:35 PM	#6
AllanD RBV Technical Advisor Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: East-Central Pennsylvania Year: 1987... sorta Make: Ford Model: Ranger Supercab Engine: '93 4.0 Class: 4x4 Used For: Roadtrip Warrior Posts: 7,169 Rep Power: 47 iTrader: (18)	Yep. Good riddance. AD __________________ Gun Control - A theory espoused by some monumentally stupid people; who claim to believe, against all logic and common sense, that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from robbing, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them that they cannot own a gun.
	Tweet

07-16-2008, 01:56 PM	#7
philzilla Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Flagstaff AZ Year: 1988 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 2.9cc putter power Class: 4x4 Used For: Dirtbike Hauler/When I am too lazy to shovel the driveway Posts: 326 Rep Power: 12 iTrader: (0)	he really left ? oh well, no more discussions on "HHO" or other random crap that doesn't work
	Tweet

07-17-2008, 10:49 AM	#8
AllanD RBV Technical Advisor Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: East-Central Pennsylvania Year: 1987... sorta Make: Ford Model: Ranger Supercab Engine: '93 4.0 Class: 4x4 Used For: Roadtrip Warrior Posts: 7,169 Rep Power: 47 iTrader: (18)	Hey! with Reno Gone can we ELIMINATE this entire forum? AD __________________ Gun Control - A theory espoused by some monumentally stupid people; who claim to believe, against all logic and common sense, that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from robbing, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them that they cannot own a gun.
	Tweet

07-18-2008, 04:50 AM	#9
philzilla Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Flagstaff AZ Year: 1988 Make: Ford Model: Ranger Engine: 2.9cc putter power Class: 4x4 Used For: Dirtbike Hauler/When I am too lazy to shovel the driveway Posts: 326 Rep Power: 12 iTrader: (0)	true, half the threads were started by him and there are almost all the same thing, i think he had a hard time getting it
	Tweet

07-20-2008, 09:23 PM	#10
Boggin Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Model: 89 bronco ii Class: 4x4 Used For: going inappropriate places Posts: 5,722 Rep Power: 29 iTrader: (4)	I liked the guy, though he did make a few too many threads __________________ 97 Jeep TJ. 6" lift and 33's. 79 F150, restoring. 90 Mustang 5.0L sold: 89 BII, lifted, bumpers, winch, and stuff "Dont know how to drive automatic"- Chance. RIP Buddy.
	Tweet

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode