| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Year: 2003
Make: FORD
Model: Ranger-SuperCab
Engine: 4.0 SOHC
Class: 4x4
Used For: Riding mad max style......
Posts: 3,131
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (38)
|
I figured all of 4x4 Ranger's had 10" drums. Well mine are finned.....and the 10" drums with the exception of the aerostar are smooth. So I'm going to assume I have the 9". Soooo...is the upgrade to 10" drums worth it?
__________________
Some people are like mushrooms, ya gotta feed em' shit and keep them in the dark. Giddywomp Offroad & Fab
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pittsville,WI
Year: 1990
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger super
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: dd
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
mine are finned and i have the 10 inch brakes, i dont think 10 in pads would fit on a 9 inch drum cuz i bought the pads for the 10 inch drum and i have had them on now for about 6 months no problem
__________________
Quote:
1990 Ranger Supercab, 4.0, Swapped in M5OD-R1, 1354 soon to be manual shift t-case, D35 front 8.8 rear w/ 3.55 gears 1997 F-150, 4.6, auto, 3.55 gears |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hersey, Mi
Year: 1977
Make: Ford
Model: Pinto
Engine: 2300
Class: 4x4
Used For: Mud racing/trails
Posts: 1,755
Rep Power: 15 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
The majority of Rangers are 9". I think maybe the 4.0s all got 10". It was an option from the start that not many people opted for.
If you are running larger than stock tires you could use the extra braking. I installed the 10" in all my Rangers and didn't have any problems. I does require pulling the axle shafts though.
__________________
'84 Ranger, 351c,C6,208,EBsas."DeRanged Mudder" '86 Ranger, 3.0swap,coil rear suspension"Black Frog" |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poconos, Pa
Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.9
Class: 4x4
Used For: D.D. 4 wheeling, hauling
Posts: 446
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
does 10 inch drum measure 10 inches at the inside or outside of the drum? Ill measure mine tomorrow, i have a rear layinng around i could sell the backing plates and stuff off of it if u need it.
__________________
1989 Ext cab XLT 2.9, FM146, Electric 4x4 ![]() Upgrade 4.0 clutch, 4.10 LSD, manual hubs 15x7 ford wheels, 31BFGs, 2" lift/traction bars hack job exhaust/intake 2000 explorer sport stock |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hersey, Mi
Year: 1977
Make: Ford
Model: Pinto
Engine: 2300
Class: 4x4
Used For: Mud racing/trails
Posts: 1,755
Rep Power: 15 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
10" inside. On the outside of the drum wil be: 10.090 max. dia.
__________________
'84 Ranger, 351c,C6,208,EBsas."DeRanged Mudder" '86 Ranger, 3.0swap,coil rear suspension"Black Frog" |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Year: 2003
Make: FORD
Model: Ranger-SuperCab
Engine: 4.0 SOHC
Class: 4x4
Used For: Riding mad max style......
Posts: 3,131
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (38)
|
So the actual inside of the drum should measure 10"? Hmmm. I'll remeasure and double check.
Yeah the axles come out. I could just get the backing plates and buy everything else new right?
__________________
Some people are like mushrooms, ya gotta feed em' shit and keep them in the dark. Giddywomp Offroad & Fab
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Year: 2019
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Hover Truck
Posts: 6,445
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
The 10" finned drum uses wider shoes than the non finned 10". They are just bigger, better brakes. I have the 10" finned drums but my axle came off of a Sploder. I'd say if you are going to the trouble to change brakes, switch to discs. The 9" brakes are fine.
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poconos, Pa
Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.9
Class: 4x4
Used For: D.D. 4 wheeling, hauling
Posts: 446
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
If u want the backing plates i can probablly pull them off my old rear if u cant find any locally. pm me if u still want them
__________________
1989 Ext cab XLT 2.9, FM146, Electric 4x4 ![]() Upgrade 4.0 clutch, 4.10 LSD, manual hubs 15x7 ford wheels, 31BFGs, 2" lift/traction bars hack job exhaust/intake 2000 explorer sport stock |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hersey, Mi
Year: 1977
Make: Ford
Model: Pinto
Engine: 2300
Class: 4x4
Used For: Mud racing/trails
Posts: 1,755
Rep Power: 15 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Quote:
10" brakes were optional on all Rangers. Most of the Gen Is had 9" though. The upgrade to 10" was very noticable in both trucks. Mostly on BIG hills. If you live in flat land and run stock tires you'll never notice a difference.
__________________
'84 Ranger, 351c,C6,208,EBsas."DeRanged Mudder" '86 Ranger, 3.0swap,coil rear suspension"Black Frog" |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Year: 2003
Make: FORD
Model: Ranger-SuperCab
Engine: 4.0 SOHC
Class: 4x4
Used For: Riding mad max style......
Posts: 3,131
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (38)
|
I had the 9" brakes. I'll stick with them, and look for a set of dual pistion calipers and steering knuckles. Mine I was trying to sell were swipped, along with a bunch of other shit.
I may look for a another set and paint them up again. There is a 96 that was rolled nearby. He may part it out. We'll see.
__________________
Some people are like mushrooms, ya gotta feed em' shit and keep them in the dark. Giddywomp Offroad & Fab
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Davisburg, Mi.
Year: 1984, 1997
Make: Ford
Model: Rangers
Engine: 302, 2.3
Used For: Literally everything.
Posts: 1,666
Rep Power: 18 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
One thing I found interesting about the 9" and 10" ranger drums is the widths.. The 9" shoes are damn near 2x the width of the 10" shoes. I was rather amazed at how skinny the 10" shoes were. At least thats what the parts guy said they were when he showed me the difference between the 2.
I'm willing to bet if you compared braking power they'd turn out to be surprisingly equal. |
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|