| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|||||||
| General Discussions This forum is for general discussions. Place posts that don't fit in any other forums here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2010 OTOTM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western Michigan
Year: 1975-1995 Ford
Make: FORD
Model: Ford
Engine: soon 5.8L
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Used For: Anger Management
Posts: 1,761
Rep Power: 15 ![]() iTrader: (2)
|
See it all the time guys pulling the 4.0 out of rangers/explorers and even after a swap puling them from B2's. And i see the same thing all the time, i want more power. The 4.0 just can't turn the 35's and it lacks blah blah blah. Really crunch the numbers. A stock 5.0L from most donor years esc carbed really isn't that better then a 4.0L power for power. Is it the cool thing? Hey i got a V8 in my ranger/explorer.
Its called gears, rings and pinions. Upgrade your truck with them. I'll take a 4.0L Distirbutorless engine any day over a distributor v8. i run 4.88s and a 4.0L on 36's and i get asked all the time at large events what kind a v8 i have in my truck. Everybody assumes v8 cause i usually make the guys running moderate v8s with 35's look like asshats with their 3.73 gears. I'll just do the v8 swap instead of a gear swap which is what is really needed. I have always said if i ever put a V8 in any of my RBV's, it'll only be one motor to ever grace my truck and that'll be a Explorer 5.0L cause it distributorless. ![]() just tossing out $.02
__________________
3 time Off Road TOTM winner
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: tennesse
Year: 1985
Make: ford
Model: bornco ll
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: what ever
Posts: 226
Rep Power: 12 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
I like my 4.0
__________________
85 bll with 4.0 eng. explorer rear leaf's with 2" blocks and front coils with the f-150 spacer's, 3" body lift and now on 33's |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: NONE
Class: 2WD
Used For: Working on
Posts: 3,203
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (5)
|
Because my friend's '79 Fairmont with a stock 5.0L HO 3.25 gear rear end w/ AOD will strait smoke the shit out of my friend's '98 4.0L SOHC Explorer?
Pete |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 302
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Used For: crawling over jeeps
Posts: 3,326
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
because my mild carbed 302 in the ranger with 3.55 gears at the time would run a low 13 1/4mi on 33's, and theres alot less togo wrong on a carbed 302, and when it does go wrong its alot cheaper to fix. and if u do the v8 swap and the gears then what do u have to say??
mild 302 350whp 4spd np205 4.56's d44 moly shafts 9" moly shafts i think i have a pretty stout combination for a guy that is doing a v8 swap........ and as far as why i did it instead of a 4.0 swap.....becuase a oppritunity came up for me to buy my old truck that i built for just 800 clams, and it was a deal i coudlnt pass on(sold it for over 3k) they cracked the frame and lost the title so there loss is my old parts back
__________________
if ur from jersey, get up on this forum http://njmudtruckshome.freeforums.org/index.php Quote:
Last edited by mhughes165; 04-23-2008 at 08:07 AM. |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canon City, CO
Year: 1984
1994
Make: FORD
FORD
Model: Ranger
Explorer
Engine: 347, 4.oh
Class: 4x4
Used For: Power Mall Crawling
Posts: 768
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
I put mine in because the tired little, 208000 mile 2.8(carb'd and distributor'd) engine just wasn't gonna cut it. I put 4:56's in and it still wasn't enough. It was also available, I had all the parts accessible to me(where there were no 4.0's). I love the 4.0 in my Explorer(yes I run the 4:88's as well) and won't ever change it unless it's for a re-built 4.0. The question that always gets me is "What kind of mpg will I get out of a V-8?". I didn't build mine for mpg so I don't have a clue, and if you want mpg, do a tune up/take the off-road parts off and leave it stock.(check out my post in showoff/I spent 6 weeks working on this, if you want to see mine and yes the coolness factor is great)
And just having the biggest engine or deepest R&P will mean you will beat everyone. Driving skill has a lot to do with how well people do( I was always told driving is 10% machine-90% driver).....Just my thoughts
__________________
84 Ranger, 347 V-8,C-6, Dana 20 t-case, X axles W/ 4:56's, Locked F/R,6" total lift,35x14.5x15 BOGGERs// 94 XLT Explorer,4.0,4:88's, Locked F/R, 7" total lift, up on 35's/2000 F-350, SuperDuty Dually, V-10, my puller _______________ The Lost Boys' motto: We don't know where we're going, but we'll be there for a while.(founding member) Quote:
Last edited by BLOODBANE; 04-23-2008 at 08:09 AM. |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Between Omaha & Des Moines
Year: 1985
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 5.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: A weapon of massive consumption.
Posts: 11,196
Rep Power: 51 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
I am going V-8 because it is much easier than putting in a 4.0, which would require the same work on my truck to install as a fuel injected 5.0. After I get it in and running I plan to go GM TBI fuel injection, which has the same basic requirements as a carb but with only 3 or 4 sensors.
Not to mention V-8's actually sound good with an exhaust as well.
__________________
1985 Ford Ranger Custom, 4x4, PA 3" BL, 5.0 HO wannabe, C5 Transmixer, 31 spline T/L 8.8 w/ disc brakes. Build Thread My Ranger is not old; no one would call her old. She has a bluff bow, lovely lines. She's a fine truck: weatherly, stiff and fast... very fast, if she's well handled. No, she's not old; she's in her prime. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 302
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Used For: crawling over jeeps
Posts: 3,326
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Quote:
lol, to make it easier, god i love that sound, ill get a vid clip of mine when its runnin in a day or two
__________________
if ur from jersey, get up on this forum http://njmudtruckshome.freeforums.org/index.php Quote:
|
||
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Cheaf of Grammor Poleace
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orem UT
Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.3
Class: 4x4
Used For: Getting irritated
Posts: 6,403
Rep Power: 33 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
8 cylinders are better than 6
But 4 with some compressed air is better than 8 or 6
__________________
I hate all RBV's, especially the ones I own. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 302
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Used For: crawling over jeeps
Posts: 3,326
Rep Power: 18 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
not really, it costs alot more to make the same power with a turbo 2.3 then a mild 302
__________________
if ur from jersey, get up on this forum http://njmudtruckshome.freeforums.org/index.php Quote:
|
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Manitoba, Coldest place in Canada
Year: 1987
Make: Ford
Model: BroncoIV
Engine: 4.0L
Class: 4x4 Extreme
Used For: DD/Wheeler
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 0 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() 350 Whp with a mild 302??? Are you serious??? Pound for pound a 2.3T Mustang setup will smoke a stock 5.0L mustang. Get a good boost controller, up the PSI to 20 or 25 and the 5.0L guys will be seeing fading taillights. I've driven a B2 with a warmed over 302 w/C4 and 15 min later drove my 4.0L/5 speed and I'll tell you that it'll be a close race. May have to take my buddy on before his B2 comes off the road. John I agree completely with you. My buddy regrets spending the time and money into his 302 swap. for 9 Mpg is it really worth it for the gas prices are not looking like they are going down. Last edited by CopyKat; 04-23-2008 at 10:10 AM. |
||
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#12 |
|
August OTOTM Winner
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grande Prairie , Alberta, Canada
Year: 1986
Model: Bronco 2
Engine: 5.0
Class: 4x4 DIY
Used For: Playing follow the leader
Posts: 979
Rep Power: 13 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
My first Car was a 75' Nova SS. 350, 4 barrel, 4 speed, posi. That is where I learned to lust for V8's
If I had a 4.0 available to me then I may have put that in, but *knowing* that I could get away with a nice power, glorious sounding V8. The choice was easy for me. |
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|