Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Truck Discussions > Towing

Notices

Towing For questions about towing or to show off your tow rig.

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2008, 10:05 PM   #1
alexl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008


Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
alexl is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default will the ranger work for me?

hi, i am new here and would like to have a few questions answered. I am on the market for a truck, but with rising gas prices, i think the wise desision would be to get a ranger, mostly because im a ford guy. now my question is this. I am a dj, so i am wanting to know if the ranger will suit my needs. I will need to pull a 10-12 foot enclosed trailer to put all my gear in. The gear weighs between 1000-1200 pounds, plus the weight of the trailer(i dont know what a 10-12 foot enclosed would weigh? What model ranger, if any, will work for me. I am not dead set on either 2wd or 4wd, but 4wd is a little more desirable for me. could you guys tell me a good year(or generation)motor, trans, 2x4 or 4x4, that is right for me. Also extended cab, standard, or short or long bed? Would it be beneficial to get an air bag assist system, or custom build a 5th wheel/gooseneck style tounge for the trailer?

Thanks for all of the help,
alex

EDIT: i would of course use a trailer with electric brakes.

Last edited by alexl; 04-03-2008 at 10:10 PM.
alexl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:16 PM   #2
mkpecor
Member
 
mkpecor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: black diamond W.A.

Year: 1988
Make: ranger 4x4
Model: super cab,st-x
Engine: 2.9
Class: off road 4x4
Used For: daily driver and weekend wheeler

Posts: 1,020
Rep Power: 13
mkpecor is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

i would get the extended cab, more leg room, and make sure you get a ranger with the 4.0 motor, that will tow what you wont. i dont know what your budget is but probly a newer rig 98 plus, if you put a add aleaf in the rear you should be o.k., for got to say welcom. good luck.
__________________
88 ranger super cab st-x-throtle body ,cold air intake, 92 explorer D35/LS 8.8 swap, 6" SK susp..lift ,black crawler rims,33" swompers,warn lock out hubs,manual t-case swap, smitty built bumpers, rock sliders,kc lights,cb ,hi lift jack,cooler full of beer
mkpecor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2008, 10:52 PM   #3
alexl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008


Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
alexl is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

id like to keep it under 5 grand, but could posibly go a little higher. What is the difference as far as towing capabilitys between the 3rd gen(93-97) then 4th (98-present) Would a third gen tow just as good?
alexl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 06:01 AM   #4
Will
Super Moderator
 
Will's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbus, Indiana

Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4X4
Used For: a chicken house

Posts: 5,855
Rep Power: 10
Will is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to beholdWill is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: (1)
Default

I'm looking at a little trailer, 6x12. This is the 2008 Ranger towing guide. They really want to sell you a 4.0, don't they? There was a time that the lowly 2.8 V6 was rated to tow almost 6,000#. I would say that any Ranger would tow a 2,500 load without blinking. You certainly don't need to fabricate a gooseneck for that--but it would be cool.
__________________
'83 Ranger cab, '89 B2 frame, 4.0, C5, D35/8.8, 4.10s, Lockrights.
'87 Chevy crew 6.2 Banks turbodiesel TH400 GearVendors 4.10 14-bolt Detroit
'96 VW Passat Tdi
'00 Ford E350 15-pax Powerstroke
'09 Suzuki TU250X
'04 Moto Guzzi Breva
http://willwills.com/
Will is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:14 AM   #5
koda6966
Member
 
koda6966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Masonville NY

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-Road
Used For: Giving me pride.

Posts: 7,842
Rep Power: 34
koda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to beholdkoda6966 is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: (4)
Default

Id say you could get a 3rd gen with that budget. I got mine for only 1000.
But since your budgets around 5k, you could get a nicer truck. Some third gens get "tired" and lose power. My 3.0 V6 only has about the same amount of power as a little 4cyl.

You also said that gas prices is why you chose a ranger, so you would want one thats only 2wd, and with a manual tranny of course. Gets better gas milage.

Mine doesnt have a hitch, so ive never been able to tow. So I wouldnt know how well each does. But I would say a 3.0 would be capable of towing.
__________________
1993 Ford Ranger XL Supercab 3.0 V6. Custom interior. Edge Conversion (WIP). 03 Explorer seats. 6" lift (WIP). Sitting on 35x12.5R15 Mastercraft Courser MT's.
1997 Jeep Cherokee Sport. 4x4/4.0/auto. Daily Driver & parts snagger.


Ranger Build Thread.
Jeep XJ Build Thread.
koda6966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:18 AM   #6
rickcdewitt
Member
 
rickcdewitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nor-cal

Year: 1991
Make: ford
Model: ranger-needs more lift
Engine: 4-0 swap
Class: 4x4
Used For: work and play

Posts: 2,075
Rep Power: 16
rickcdewitt is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (7)
Default

if you are going to tow try to find a 4.10 geared truck
__________________
4.10's, 33's, duff stage 3 w/4" coils, cb,cowl snorkle, homemade high clearance d-ring bumpers,bobbed bed,8.8
My bobtail beater
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastpakr
Try to stick to posting about trucks, unless you can figure out a way to control yourself.
rickcdewitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 03:46 PM   #7
racsan
Member
 
racsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: marion ohio

Year: 1993
Make: ford
Model: ranger s/c
Engine: 4.0/245 c.i.d.
Class: 4xford
Used For: gitten' it done!

Posts: 1,319
Rep Power: 16
racsan has a spectacular aura aboutracsan has a spectacular aura aboutracsan has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to racsan Send a message via AIM to racsan Send a message via Yahoo to racsan
Default

lower gears are your best bet. i have a 6x10 haulmark that weighs about 1,000 empty. it has a high roof, about 8' (6 ft interior height) my biggest problem is wind resistance on the front of the trailer while going down the road. i have the 4.0 with 3.73's sometimes i wonder how 4.56's would do. i get 17-19 without the trailer and about 15 at best pulling the trailer, i dont use o/d. i almost think a 1/2 ton 302 would do the job just as well and have a litle more power behind it.
________
Ferrari 612 Scaglietti

Last edited by racsan; 01-27-2011 at 12:28 PM.
racsan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 04:37 PM   #8
85_Ranger4x4
Member
 
85_Ranger4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Between Omaha & Des Moines

Year: 1985
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 5.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: A weapon of massive consumption.

Posts: 11,197
Rep Power: 51
85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future85_Ranger4x4 has a brilliant future
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by racsan View Post
lower gears are your best bet. i have a 6x10 haulmark that weighs about 1,000 empty. it has a high roof, about 8' (6 ft interior height) my biggest problem is wind resistance on the front of the trailer while going down the road. i have the 4.0 with 3.73's sometimes i wonder how 4.56's would do. i get 17-19 without the trailer and about 15 at best pulling the trailer, i dont use o/d. i almost think a 1/2 ton 302 would do the job just as well and have a litle more power behind it.
A 302 half ton might get 15 empty, I can't see it getting any better than your Ranger pulling your trailer.
__________________
1985 Ford Ranger Custom, 4x4, PA 3" BL, 5.0 HO wannabe, C5 Transmixer, 31 spline T/L 8.8 w/ disc brakes.

Build Thread

My Ranger is not old; no one would call her old. She has a bluff bow, lovely lines. She's a fine truck: weatherly, stiff and fast... very fast, if she's well handled. No, she's not old; she's in her prime.
85_Ranger4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:03 PM   #9
Wicked_Sludge
Member
 
Wicked_Sludge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies

Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25
Wicked_Sludge will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Wicked_Sludge
Default

your talking less than 2,000lbs...probably closer to 1800. you could do that with a 4 banger if you were patient...and you'd get 25+ MPG unloaded.

i'd go with a 3.0 though (but then...im biased ). you have a medium load, get a medium engine. i average 20 MPG unloaded (closer to 24 with proper gearing)...and got about 17-18 towing a 3,000lb enclosed trailer across state.

if you wont miss 4wd...dont get it. it adds weight (less MPG and less power for towing) and complexity (higher maintainence costs).

i dont mind my single cab (personally, i think they look better)...but if you need a lot of junk within arms reach, get an extended cab.

i always vote for a 5 speed. more
reliable, cheaper, better economy. of coarse, for someone thats never towed with a stick before, your clutch life may not be long. lower gears will help save the clutch.

for that small of a load, the stock rear suspension will be just fine. just make sure you learn how to PROPERLY load the trailer. trailer brakes are also unnecessary, and you'll probably find most trailers in that range dont come equipped with brakes.

__________________
As seen on the internets!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hahnsb2 View Post
Dyno sheet or GTFO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger Dave (B25) View Post
The call was for scantily-clad women. A Certificate of Boob Authenticity was NOT specified.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Imahara
I'm not sure if we have the right stuff; I'm just hoping we don't have the wrong stuff.
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM.
Wicked_Sludge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 09:03 PM   #10
alexl
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008


Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
alexl is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Thanks for all the replys guys, they help alot. the reason i am wanting a 3rd gen is because even though my budget is 5 grand, id rather spend less, because i also have to purchase a trailer. Allthough i will probably get a flatbed trailer and make it inclosed. My idea is to build removable 4' tall sides, because i woudlnt not stack my equipment more than 4 feet high anyway-SCARY. and have bows that go across and a heavy duty tarp to cover the top. Being 4 feet tall, it would also have considerable less wind resistance.

EDIT: the reason i will probably go with the 4.0 is because i want to make sure if i haul a little more at times it can handle it. I currently drive a 5 speed, and do just fine with it, i will take a manual over auto any day. Although i havent towed with a stick, i think i could learn quickly. Also, i am a country boy, so loading a trailer right...no sweat.

Last edited by alexl; 04-04-2008 at 09:05 PM.
alexl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 09:16 PM   #11
Wicked_Sludge
Member
 
Wicked_Sludge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA

Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies

Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25
Wicked_Sludge will become famous soon enough
iTrader: (0)
Send a message via MSN to Wicked_Sludge
Default

the 4.0 is a trade off. it has more power than the 3.0...but also gets 15-20% lower fuel economy. i can almost guarantee a 3.0 will be able to accomplish what you'll be asking of it (i tow with mine all the time, and i have bad gearing to boot), but its up to you.
__________________
As seen on the internets!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hahnsb2 View Post
Dyno sheet or GTFO
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger Dave (B25) View Post
The call was for scantily-clad women. A Certificate of Boob Authenticity was NOT specified.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Imahara
I'm not sure if we have the right stuff; I'm just hoping we don't have the wrong stuff.
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM.
Wicked_Sludge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 10:19 PM   #12
Sevensecondsuv
Member
 
Sevensecondsuv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rockford, IL

Year: 1989,1990,1992
Make: Ford
Model: F150, Ranger, Explorer
Engine: 4.9L,2.3T,4.0L
Class: 2wd,2wd,4x4
Used For: Towing, Speeding, DD/4x4ing

Posts: 1,123
Rep Power: 14
Sevensecondsuv is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (1)
Default

I would get a 2wd 5-spd with one of the V-6s. The one thing you don't want is an auto. Ranger auto's aren't all the great to begin with and daily towing duties aren't going to help.

FWIW, I've towed a 6x12 enclosed trailer with my 4-banger ranger. I did it just fine, except it wouldn't go much over 45 mph.

My 4.0 explorer on the other hand is capable of maintaining 75 mph with the same trailer in tow so long as there's not much of a headwind. Those enclosed trailers will kill you if there's a headwind.
__________________
2011 Ford Ranger XLT Ext Cab 2.3L 5-spd - DD
1992 Explorer Sport 4wd 5-spd
1995 Ford F-150 Custom 4wd 4.9L ZF5 coming soon!
2005 Lincoln LS 3.0L V6 - Wife's
Past: 1990 Ranger 2wd 2.3L Turbo
Sevensecondsuv is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles