| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Towing For questions about towing or to show off your tow rig. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
|
hi, i am new here and would like to have a few questions answered. I am on the market for a truck, but with rising gas prices, i think the wise desision would be to get a ranger, mostly because im a ford guy. now my question is this. I am a dj, so i am wanting to know if the ranger will suit my needs. I will need to pull a 10-12 foot enclosed trailer to put all my gear in. The gear weighs between 1000-1200 pounds, plus the weight of the trailer(i dont know what a 10-12 foot enclosed would weigh? What model ranger, if any, will work for me. I am not dead set on either 2wd or 4wd, but 4wd is a little more desirable for me. could you guys tell me a good year(or generation)motor, trans, 2x4 or 4x4, that is right for me. Also extended cab, standard, or short or long bed? Would it be beneficial to get an air bag assist system, or custom build a 5th wheel/gooseneck style tounge for the trailer?
Thanks for all of the help, alex EDIT: i would of course use a trailer with electric brakes. Last edited by alexl; 04-03-2008 at 10:10 PM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: black diamond W.A.
Year: 1988
Make: ranger 4x4
Model: super cab,st-x
Engine: 2.9
Class: off road 4x4
Used For: daily driver and weekend wheeler
Posts: 1,020
Rep Power: 13 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
i would get the extended cab, more leg room, and make sure you get a ranger with the 4.0 motor, that will tow what you wont. i dont know what your budget is but probly a newer rig 98 plus, if you put a add aleaf in the rear you should be o.k., for got to say welcom. good luck.
__________________
88 ranger super cab st-x-throtle body ,cold air intake, 92 explorer D35/LS 8.8 swap, 6" SK susp..lift ,black crawler rims,33" swompers,warn lock out hubs,manual t-case swap, smitty built bumpers, rock sliders,kc lights,cb ,hi lift jack,cooler full of beer
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbus, Indiana
Year: 1989
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4X4
Used For: a chicken house
Posts: 5,855
Rep Power: 10 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
I'm looking at a little trailer, 6x12. This is the 2008 Ranger towing guide. They really want to sell you a 4.0, don't they? There was a time that the lowly 2.8 V6 was rated to tow almost 6,000#. I would say that any Ranger would tow a 2,500 load without blinking. You certainly don't need to fabricate a gooseneck for that--but it would be cool.
__________________
'83 Ranger cab, '89 B2 frame, 4.0, C5, D35/8.8, 4.10s, Lockrights. '87 Chevy crew 6.2 Banks turbodiesel TH400 GearVendors 4.10 14-bolt Detroit '96 VW Passat Tdi '00 Ford E350 15-pax Powerstroke '09 Suzuki TU250X '04 Moto Guzzi Breva http://willwills.com/ |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Masonville NY
Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-Road
Used For: Giving me pride.
Posts: 7,842
Rep Power: 34 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (4)
|
Id say you could get a 3rd gen with that budget. I got mine for only 1000.
But since your budgets around 5k, you could get a nicer truck. Some third gens get "tired" and lose power. My 3.0 V6 only has about the same amount of power as a little 4cyl. You also said that gas prices is why you chose a ranger, so you would want one thats only 2wd, and with a manual tranny of course. Gets better gas milage. Mine doesnt have a hitch, so ive never been able to tow. So I wouldnt know how well each does. But I would say a 3.0 would be capable of towing.
__________________
1993 Ford Ranger XL Supercab 3.0 V6. Custom interior. Edge Conversion (WIP). 03 Explorer seats. 6" lift (WIP). Sitting on 35x12.5R15 Mastercraft Courser MT's. 1997 Jeep Cherokee Sport. 4x4/4.0/auto. Daily Driver & parts snagger. Ranger Build Thread. Jeep XJ Build Thread. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: nor-cal
Year: 1991
Make: ford
Model: ranger-needs more lift
Engine: 4-0 swap
Class: 4x4
Used For: work and play
Posts: 2,075
Rep Power: 16 ![]() iTrader: (7)
|
if you are going to tow try to find a 4.10 geared truck
__________________
4.10's, 33's, duff stage 3 w/4" coils, cb,cowl snorkle, homemade high clearance d-ring bumpers,bobbed bed,8.8 My bobtail beater Quote:
|
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: marion ohio
Year: 1993
Make: ford
Model: ranger s/c
Engine: 4.0/245 c.i.d.
Class: 4xford
Used For: gitten' it done!
Posts: 1,319
Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
lower gears are your best bet. i have a 6x10 haulmark that weighs about 1,000 empty. it has a high roof, about 8' (6 ft interior height) my biggest problem is wind resistance on the front of the trailer while going down the road. i have the 4.0 with 3.73's sometimes i wonder how 4.56's would do. i get 17-19 without the trailer and about 15 at best pulling the trailer, i dont use o/d. i almost think a 1/2 ton 302 would do the job just as well and have a litle more power behind it.
![]() ________ Ferrari 612 Scaglietti Last edited by racsan; 01-27-2011 at 12:28 PM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Between Omaha & Des Moines
Year: 1985
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 5.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: A weapon of massive consumption.
Posts: 11,197
Rep Power: 51 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Quote:
__________________
1985 Ford Ranger Custom, 4x4, PA 3" BL, 5.0 HO wannabe, C5 Transmixer, 31 spline T/L 8.8 w/ disc brakes. Build Thread My Ranger is not old; no one would call her old. She has a bluff bow, lovely lines. She's a fine truck: weatherly, stiff and fast... very fast, if she's well handled. No, she's not old; she's in her prime. |
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA
Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies
Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
your talking less than 2,000lbs...probably closer to 1800. you could do that with a 4 banger if you were patient...and you'd get 25+ MPG unloaded.
i'd go with a 3.0 though (but then...im biased if you wont miss 4wd...dont get it. it adds weight (less MPG and less power for towing) and complexity (higher maintainence costs). i dont mind my single cab (personally, i think they look better)...but if you need a lot of junk within arms reach, get an extended cab. i always vote for a 5 speed. more reliable, cheaper, better economy. of coarse, for someone thats never towed with a stick before, your clutch life may not be long. lower gears will help save the clutch. for that small of a load, the stock rear suspension will be just fine. just make sure you learn how to PROPERLY load the trailer. trailer brakes are also unnecessary, and you'll probably find most trailers in that range dont come equipped with brakes.
__________________
As seen on the internets! Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM. |
||
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New Member
|
Thanks for all the replys guys, they help alot. the reason i am wanting a 3rd gen is because even though my budget is 5 grand, id rather spend less, because i also have to purchase a trailer. Allthough i will probably get a flatbed trailer and make it inclosed. My idea is to build removable 4' tall sides, because i woudlnt not stack my equipment more than 4 feet high anyway-SCARY. and have bows that go across and a heavy duty tarp to cover the top. Being 4 feet tall, it would also have considerable less wind resistance.
EDIT: the reason i will probably go with the 4.0 is because i want to make sure if i haul a little more at times it can handle it. I currently drive a 5 speed, and do just fine with it, i will take a manual over auto any day. Although i havent towed with a stick, i think i could learn quickly. Also, i am a country boy, so loading a trailer right...no sweat. Last edited by alexl; 04-04-2008 at 09:05 PM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Westport, WA
Year: 1993
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger, Flareside
Engine: 3-point-GO
Class: 4x4
Used For: Attracting the ladies
Posts: 6,938
Rep Power: 25 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
the 4.0 is a trade off. it has more power than the 3.0...but also gets 15-20% lower fuel economy. i can almost guarantee a 3.0 will be able to accomplish what you'll be asking of it (i tow with mine all the time, and i have bad gearing to boot), but its up to you.
__________________
As seen on the internets! Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Wicked_Sludge : Today at 09:16 PM. |
||
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rockford, IL
Year: 1989,1990,1992
Make: Ford
Model: F150, Ranger, Explorer
Engine: 4.9L,2.3T,4.0L
Class: 2wd,2wd,4x4
Used For: Towing, Speeding, DD/4x4ing
Posts: 1,123
Rep Power: 14 ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
I would get a 2wd 5-spd with one of the V-6s. The one thing you don't want is an auto. Ranger auto's aren't all the great to begin with and daily towing duties aren't going to help.
FWIW, I've towed a 6x12 enclosed trailer with my 4-banger ranger. I did it just fine, except it wouldn't go much over 45 mph. My 4.0 explorer on the other hand is capable of maintaining 75 mph with the same trailer in tow so long as there's not much of a headwind. Those enclosed trailers will kill you if there's a headwind.
__________________
2011 Ford Ranger XLT Ext Cab 2.3L 5-spd - DD 1992 Explorer Sport 4wd 5-spd 1995 Ford F-150 Custom 4wd 4.9L ZF5 coming soon! 2005 Lincoln LS 3.0L V6 - Wife's Past: 1990 Ranger 2wd 2.3L Turbo
|
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|