will 185/65/15 work instead of 205/60/15

modelageek · 06-02-2011, 10:18 AM

This for a. 98 Nissan Altima. The car calls for the 205's but I have 4 brand new toyo M&S that are 185/65/15. Would they fit on the rims and be drivable on the car. TIA

Captain Ledd · 06-02-2011, 01:12 PM

185/65R15 = 24.47" tall
824.25 revolutions per mile

205/60R15 = 24.69" tall
817.02 revolutions per mile

So a little less than a 1/4" difference in overall diameter between the tires.

Over the course of a mile, the smaller tire will have turned roughly 7 more times around than the normal tire.

Driveable? Definately.

The only draw back (if you can call it that) is a mild (and I mean MILD) decrease in speed. The car will be traveling juuuust slightly slower than whats on the speedometer. Probably not even noticeable actually.

If the 185's are for 15" rims then do it up.

modelageek · 06-02-2011, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Ledd

185/65R15 = 24.47" tall
824.25 revolutions per mile

205/60R15 = 24.69" tall
817.02 revolutions per mile

So a little less than a 1/4" difference in overall diameter between the tires.

Driveable? Definately.

The only draw back (if you can call it that) is a mild (and I mean MILD) decrease in speed. The car will be traveling juuuust slightly slower than whats on the speedometer.

If the 185's are for 15" rims then do it up.

thanks for the great feedback!!!

TRH · 06-05-2011, 02:54 PM

The sectional width is pretty significantly different. Depending on the rim, you might not be able to. It's worth a shot though.

06-02-2011, 10:18 AM	#1
modelageek Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 2,199 Vehicle Year: 2004 Vehicle Make: Ford Vehicle Model: Ext Cab, 4WD, Auto, 4WABS, AC, 140k/90k. Rep Power: 21	will 185/65/15 work instead of 205/60/15 This for a. 98 Nissan Altima. The car calls for the 205's but I have 4 brand new toyo M&S that are 185/65/15. Would they fit on the rims and be drivable on the car. TIA __________________ 2004 Ext Cab, 4WD, 4.0, Auto, 153k(engine is out of a 2009 Ranger with 95k) Mileage readings as of 5/14/2017 2004 Ford Ranger Edge, Ext Cab, 2WD, 3.0, 5 speed, 116,000, AC. (SOLD) 1999 Ford Ranger, Reg Cab, 2.5, 5 speed, 2WD, no AC, 150k (SOLD)

06-02-2011, 01:12 PM	#2
Captain Ledd Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Michigan Posts: 2,206 Vehicle Year: 1984, 1997 Vehicle Make: Ford Vehicle Model: Rangers I use this vehicle for: Literally everything. My credo: If you're not making mistakes, you're not learning. Rep Power: 29	185/65R15 = 24.47" tall 824.25 revolutions per mile 205/60R15 = 24.69" tall 817.02 revolutions per mile So a little less than a 1/4" difference in overall diameter between the tires. Over the course of a mile, the smaller tire will have turned roughly 7 more times around than the normal tire. Driveable? Definately. The only draw back (if you can call it that) is a mild (and I mean MILD) decrease in speed. The car will be traveling juuuust slightly slower than whats on the speedometer. Probably not even noticeable actually. If the 185's are for 15" rims then do it up. __________________ "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" - Albert Einstein Never give up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6hz_s2XIAU 1984 Ranger - std cab, long bed: The Deathtrap 302; T18; D20 Tcase; 6' lift; 4.56 gears; 33' pro comp MT's; Aussie locked rear 1997 Ranger - std cab, short bed: Red Ranger 2.3L; M50D R1; 2wd; 4.56 gears; Explorer 8.8; ARB locker; 235/75R15 AT's (soon to undergo 4x4 conversion )

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

06-05-2011, 02:54 PM	#4
TRH Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 67 Vehicle Year: '89 Vehicle Make: Ford Vehicle Model: Ranger XLT Rep Power: 16	The sectional width is pretty significantly different. Depending on the rim, you might not be able to. It's worth a shot though.