33 on stock suspension??
- Thread starter Ryan114
- Start date
body lift and torsion crank that what i did to fit 33.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
- Messages
- 7,192
- Points
- 5,101
- City
- Pittsburgh
- State - Country
- PA - USA
- Vehicle Year
- 2020
- Vehicle
- Ford Ranger
- Drive
- 4WD
- Engine
- 2.3 EcoBoost
- Transmission
- Automatic
- Total Lift
- 1.5"
- Tire Size
- 265/70-17
- My credo
- "220, 221, whatever it takes."
If you turn up the torsion bars 1.5" or so, you can fit a narrow 33" like a 33x10.50-15 or 285/75-16.
If you want a wider 33" like the common 33x12.50-15 or 305/70-16, you will need at least a body lift and rims with less backspace than stock to push the tires away from the body a little bit.
If you want a wider 33" like the common 33x12.50-15 or 305/70-16, you will need at least a body lift and rims with less backspace than stock to push the tires away from the body a little bit.
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 38
- Points
- 3,101
- Vehicle Year
- 2000
- Transmission
- Automatic
I've got a 2000 Ranger Ext Cab 3.0, I fit 33x12.50's with just the torsions cranked a bit. I leveled it, then cranked it a few more threads and I was good. The only way I ever hit was if I nosed over something. You can do it! Oh, I had to take my front mud flaps off too though. Looks better in my opinion anyways
- Joined
- May 11, 2009
- Messages
- 38
- Points
- 3,101
- Vehicle Year
- 2000
- Transmission
- Automatic
But I just added a 3" bodylift. It looks much better I think. And there's definitely no clearance issues. Looking back, if I wouldn't have done the body lift. I would have gotten some 32x11.50's
Sponsored Ad
TRS Events & Gatherings
Featured Rangers
TRS Latest Video
Official TRS Merchandise
Follow TRS On Instagram
