| Home | Forums | Info - Technical | Info - Other | TRS News | Photo Galleries | Shirts & Decals | Parts Store | Classifieds |
|
|
|
|||||||
| General Discussions This forum is for general discussions. Place posts that don't fit in any other forums here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger STX
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD
Used For: Project Papa J
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Soon I'll be tackling the task of swapping most of the drivetrain from a 4x4 '93 donor into my 4x2 '94 truck. Thinking about the engine crossmember and such...
would it be easier to swap the bodies? Both are extra cabs so I'm not seeing why it wouldn't work. I know there's a lot of wiring going on with a body swap. Either way has pros and cons: Swap body: Pro: - Clean up and rust proof the frame (not a huge deal down here in the south) - No engine crossmember drama - No cutting off every damn rivet on the suspension brackets Con: - Having to go through the suspension anyway to replace all the bushings - Lots of wiring to deal with - I'll be PISSED if we drop the bed and scratch it up. Swap drivetrain: Pro: - No wiring of body swap - Almost the entire drivetrain is coming out so would be easy to swap all the bushings - Could clean up engine and rebuild shifter and such while it's out Con: - Wouldn't get to rust proof the frame easily - LOTS of work fighting with the engine crossmember - Swapping in an electric 1354 only to swap it out for a manual unit ASAP Anyone have more to add to either of these? I'm up in the air about which I'll do.
__________________
2012 JKU Sport, Deep Cherry, Auto, 3.73s, lots of upgrades. 1994 Ford Ranger STX, 3.0/M5OD, bone stock, under the knife. "Project Papa J" |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Premium Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver, trail ready
Posts: 990
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
Body swap IMO, maybe a bit more work but sounds easier than an engine swap.
Sent from the road while ignoring traffic |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lakewood,Wa
Year: 1994
Make: ford
Model: ranger xlt long bed
Engine: 2.3l
Used For: hauling ,camping,towing ,fun
Posts: 824
Rep Power: 14 ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
The bed only takes 2 people to remove & replace ,but the extended cabs are extremely heavy & should be done with a forklift or 4x4 posts & blocks with either Hi-lift jacks or a overhead rafter set up reinforced in a barn with a block & tackle chain hoist.
I bought a 98 extended cab & with out the back window,missing 1 side window & both doors already off It took 4 guys to lift it up & over the engine & put it onto my temporary flat bed. It took 3 of us to get it off of my flatbed & onto my utility trailers side rails. Even with the weight involved Im thinking it would be easier for the body swap then the cross member removal & replacement. Last edited by 94 lngbd; 05-12-2012 at 12:44 PM. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger STX
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD
Used For: Project Papa J
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
I went out and inspected the crossmember. It doesn't look that bad... a few rivets and a couple welds to grind. Good excuse to buy an air chisel...
__________________
2012 JKU Sport, Deep Cherry, Auto, 3.73s, lots of upgrades. 1994 Ford Ranger STX, 3.0/M5OD, bone stock, under the knife. "Project Papa J" |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Year: 1994
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger STX
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD
Used For: Project Papa J
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
Still in the air though. It's a ton of work either way.
__________________
2012 JKU Sport, Deep Cherry, Auto, 3.73s, lots of upgrades. 1994 Ford Ranger STX, 3.0/M5OD, bone stock, under the knife. "Project Papa J" |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Year: 1995/1996
Make: ford
Model: ranger
Engine: 2.3
Class: 4x4
Used For: daily driver
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 3 ![]() iTrader: (0)
|
im in the middle of a body swap right it really isnt all that bad ive been doing it for awhile but i really only work on it on sat. and sun im trying not to get in a hurry cause i tend to screw up when i do
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#7 |
|
RBV Technical Advisor
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: East-Central Pennsylvania
Year: 1987... sorta
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Supercab
Engine: '93 4.0
Class: 4x4
Used For: Roadtrip Warrior
Posts: 7,169
Rep Power: 47 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (18)
|
I've done both and I vote body swap.
AD
__________________
Gun Control - A theory espoused by some monumentally stupid people; who claim to believe, against all logic and common sense, that a violent predator who ignores the laws prohibiting them from robbing, raping, kidnapping, torturing and killing their fellow human beings will obey a law telling them that they cannot own a gun. |
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Resident Brewer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bothell, WA
Year: 1999
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.5
Class: 2wd
Used For: Titties n beer
Posts: 6,651
Rep Power: 48 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (6)
|
I say body.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Tweet
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Salem Oregon
Year: 1990
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Engine: 2.3 Turbo
Class: 4x4
Used For: holding down the driveway
Posts: 2,648
Rep Power: 32 ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: (1)
|
I've done the body swap, and say it's most likely easier...
__________________
converted to 4x4, turbo'd the 2.3, 6" lift with 35's and 5.13 gears! Send e-mail instead of PM, box full... |
|
|
Tweet
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|