Serving Ford Ranger, Bronco II, Explorer & Mazda B-Series Owners Since 1999

 
 
Home Forums Info - Technical Info - Other TRS News Photo Galleries Shirts & Decals Parts Store Classifieds

 

Go Back   The Ranger Station Forums > Suspension & Armor > PreRunners

Notices

PreRunners Dedicated to legendary desert racer and Ranger driver Manny Esquerra.

Post New Thread Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2012, 01:56 PM   #25
2kxlt3.slow
Junior Member
 
2kxlt3.slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warrensburg MO.

Year: 2000
Make: RANGER
Model: xlt 2wd 3.0
Engine: soon to be 302
Class: future prerunner
Used For: Doing things i shouldn't

Posts: 51
Rep Power: 4
2kxlt3.slow is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

When you say using mild steel is fine for the building of the suspension components would that be hot rolled or cold rolled. just done a lot of searching and cant find definitive answer, im planning on fabing my own suspension aswell, planning on using 3/16 cold rolled if i can find it were im at, unless hot rolled is ok then thats everywere.
__________________
DO WORK SON !!!
2kxlt3.slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2012, 03:45 AM   #26
redrider121
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2011

Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Edge 2WD

Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0
redrider121 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

I am working with a few professors at Sac State on which materials to use. I've come to the conclusion that, even though Chromoly is wayyy stronger, it doesn't have as long of a life span. So what I'm trying to say is that unless your on a professional, sponsored team and scrapping the frame/suspension every two years at the longest, it's vulnerable for failure because of fatigue.

So what this means is stronger the material=brittleness=fatigue=short life= $$$$. This goes for any material that is stronger. It seems as if standard hot rolled steel is the best way to go.

Cold rolled means its just cut and rolled super precisely to your specifications. But if your going to weld it, there will be some slight warpage which defeats the purpose of cold rolled haha. But maybe I'm getting cold rolled and flat bar confused....
redrider121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2012, 11:22 PM   #27
Cody Ray
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix


Posts: 150
Rep Power: 6
Cody Ray is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

I believe flat bar can be hot or cold rolled. Cold rolling work hardens the metal and improves surface finish but requires multiple passes to produce the same thickness as hot rolled.
Cody Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 12:06 AM   #28
doyouquaxu
Member
 
doyouquaxu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County CA

Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-Road
Used For: Desert Shenanigans and DD

Posts: 783
Rep Power: 12
doyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redrider121 View Post
I am working with a few professors at Sac State on which materials to use. I've come to the conclusion that, even though Chromoly is wayyy stronger, it doesn't have as long of a life span. So what I'm trying to say is that unless your on a professional, sponsored team and scrapping the frame/suspension every two years at the longest, it's vulnerable for failure because of fatigue.

So what this means is stronger the material=brittleness=fatigue=short life= $$$$. This goes for any material that is stronger. It seems as if standard hot rolled steel is the best way to go.

Cold rolled means its just cut and rolled super precisely to your specifications. But if your going to weld it, there will be some slight warpage which defeats the purpose of cold rolled haha. But maybe I'm getting cold rolled and flat bar confused....
on a race truck, i could see fatigue being an issue. but i doubt the OP will be out racing every chance he gets, if at all. 4130 would be fine and would hold up for the life of the truck.

lesser grades of metal can and are used, 4130's main reason for use is weight savings by being able to use a thinner piece of metal throughout. on a properly designed arm, you can use a bit thicker cold rolled plate and still be just as well off as using 4130.
__________________
Quote:
So this thread should be about pictures of your truck next to a tank.
doyouquaxu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2012, 07:14 PM   #29
2kxlt3.slow
Junior Member
 
2kxlt3.slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warrensburg MO.

Year: 2000
Make: RANGER
Model: xlt 2wd 3.0
Engine: soon to be 302
Class: future prerunner
Used For: Doing things i shouldn't

Posts: 51
Rep Power: 4
2kxlt3.slow is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

From the reading ive done, if i understand correctly cold rolled is sent through the rollers at room temp making it both cleaner to work with than hot rolled but also tighter compression of the molecuels within the metal which equalls higher stregth? is that accurate? also the reason for asking is who can afford 4130 as a privateer building a DD/play truck. Cold rolled sheet is like 5x the price of hot rolled. i can swing cold rolled if it is infact stronger then hot rolled but if hot rolled is fine if you structure properly i would just go with that.
__________________
DO WORK SON !!!

Last edited by 2kxlt3.slow; 03-13-2012 at 08:44 PM.
2kxlt3.slow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012, 05:34 PM   #30
redrider121
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2011

Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger Edge 2WD

Posts: 16
Rep Power: 0
redrider121 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: (0)
Default

Alright, I know this thread is kind of old and maybe gone crap lol. Anyways, I was just going to ask if anyone thinks I should attempt to use the stock uprights and spindles, or if I should fabricate my own?

Oh and a quick update, I think I'm going to make a subframe that bolts straight in to the existing a-arm/control arm locations with tabs for the new a-arms and control arms mounted a little bit lower. Also the subframe is going to have the shock hoops connected to it. The reasoning is it could give the front end some added strength, and better ground clearance. I know it will be heavier, but thats not the biggest concern. The biggest concern is making it as bolt-on as possible incase I ever need to go back to stock. And with the shock hoops mounted to the subframe, I'll only need to cut the wheel wells in one location so the cross bar for the top of the shock hoops can be mounted.

Nothing has happened yet, but as soon as it does, Ill post pictures.
redrider121 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2012, 04:39 PM   #31
doyouquaxu
Member
 
doyouquaxu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County CA

Year: 2005
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Engine: 3.0
Class: 2WD Off-Road
Used For: Desert Shenanigans and DD

Posts: 783
Rep Power: 12
doyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the roughdoyouquaxu is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: (0)
Default

so... you want to make your own drop brackets? personally, i would use the stock frame mounting points and build a sub frame connecting those mounts to keep them from bending/breaking.

since you're fabricating this yourself, i would honestly say build a new spindle and have it utilize a bolt on hub. blitzkrieg sells a snout block for like 150/pair that you can bolt a d35 off an older 4x4 ranger/explorer to, a d44, or anyone's race hub. the stock ranger snouts and bearings do not like big tires and the beating of off roading at higher speeds. you can also build a few inches of lift into the spindle so you get some added ground clearance.
__________________
Quote:
So this thread should be about pictures of your truck next to a tank.
doyouquaxu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
baja, lift kit, long travel, prerunner

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.


© 1999-2012 / 959 Media LLC / All Rights Reserved

The Ranger Station is in no way affiliated with the Ford Motor Company.

[Legal Notices]   [Advertising/Vendors]
 
Also check out SSP Central for Special Service & Non-Traditional Police & Fire Vehicles