2.3d and 2.3l
- Thread starter mark123
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 3,340
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 38
- City
- Guilford, CT
- Vehicle Year
- 2006, 1994
- Transmission
- Automatic
They are completely different engines...no parts between them are interchangable.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,753
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 60
- City
- Hersey, Mi
- Vehicle Year
- 1977
- Transmission
- Manual
Hey, welcome to TRS!
If they can put a 500 caddy in a chevette, It would be no problem putting a duratec in an older Ranger.
Really though, It would be a complete custom job. Nothing will bolt or plug in.
If they can put a 500 caddy in a chevette, It would be no problem putting a duratec in an older Ranger.
Really though, It would be a complete custom job. Nothing will bolt or plug in.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 1,753
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 60
- City
- Hersey, Mi
- Vehicle Year
- 1977
- Transmission
- Manual
Well, I fix cars for a living. I work on everything. I've NEVER worked on a Duratec. I would have to say that they are better than average. That might not mean anything though.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 3,340
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 38
- City
- Guilford, CT
- Vehicle Year
- 2006, 1994
- Transmission
- Automatic
Probably the hardest part would be the computer/wiring. Motor mounts might be the same, if not it shouldn't be hard to make something work. The bellhousing bolt pattern for the transmissions are different so you'll need a new tranny, but it's the same tranny so it should just bolt right in.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2007
- Messages
- 314
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 44
- Vehicle Year
- 1993
- Transmission
- Manual
you fill me with skepticism ...
Sponsored Ad
TRS Events & Gatherings
Featured Rangers
TRS Latest Video
Official TRS Merchandise
Follow TRS On Instagram
