slave cylinder differences?


scotts90ranger

25+ Year Member

Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
10,759
Points
7,601
City
Dayton
State - Country
OR - USA
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Drive
4WD
Engine
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
ok, I got a slave cylinder for my truck (90), it wasn't dead so I didn't replace it, now my girlfriends parents definetely have a shot slave (pedal is HARD) on their '94, I was looking on shucks website and they have a "what this part fits" page and they say mine is the same as '88-92, and there's a different one for '93-01, is there really a difference? both are definetely a M5OD, since they're both 2.3's

thanks
 
if theres 2 different part #s for different year breaks, then there must be some difference, not sure what it might be though. maybe the "newer" style is a enginered upgrade.
________
marijuana pictures
 
Last edited:
the slaves are different, the older one uses a different quick connect fitting than the newer one. Are you sure their slave is shot? a hard pedal doesn't indicate a bad slave, but a soft pedal with fluid loss and difficulty engaugeing gears will almost always indicate a bad slave. From everything I've driven I have found that my 94 ranger has a VERY stiff clutch pedal and I know it's not an issue with the parts as every part of the system has been replaced and it didn't make it any easier on my leg.
 
I beg to differ; My '93 clutch was rock hard and the slave leaked. When replaced, the pedal is back to normal.
 

Sponsored Ad

TRS Events & Gatherings

Featured Rangers

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

TRS Latest Video

Official TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram


Product Suggestions

Back
Top