- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Messages
- 83
- Points
- 3,101
- City
- Tampa, FL
- Vehicle Year
- 1999
- Transmission
- Automatic
What tires are better? Pro comp mud terrain, or bfg?
32x10.50R15.
32x10.50R15.
Pro Comp Tires vs BFG?
- Thread starter 4x4ranger99.
- Start date
Im a big fan of the Bfg M/T KM2's and A/T never tried pro comps but i have nothing but good things to say about the BFG M/T Km2s
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,433
- Points
- 3,101
- Age
- 56
- City
- Edmonton,AB
- Vehicle Year
- 1999
- Engine
- 4.0 V6
- Transmission
- Automatic
I had some Extreme Mud Terrains. Thought they were a great tire. Got rid of them to go bigger.
x2 bfg km2. i had a buddy who had the original bfg's and had about 30,000 miles on them mostly highway miles and you could barely see any wear. Also on my old 83 ranger i had a set of bfg km2's and besides the cost..(200$ a tire for a metric size of smaller than 30 x 9.50) they were awsome, they didn't show any wear after roughly 5,000 miles ish of wear.
I have ran BFG A/T's and the ProComp A/T's (currently on truck). I liked the BFG's better seem to have more traction and lasted longer.
Sponsored Ad
TRS Events & Gatherings
Featured Rangers
TRS Latest Video
Official TRS Merchandise
Follow TRS On Instagram
