Burnside
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2007
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Sparland IL.
- Vehicle Year
- 1989
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Transmission
- Manual
So i'm trying to finish up this 4.0 swap. Everything works but I have no spark. Head lights work, all the lights on the dash work, fuel pump works; i got good pressure at the rail, engine cranks over good, just no spark. So i got the good ol fluke out and manual out and started performing all the ignition system checks.
-Battery is fully charged.
-Cables are clean have have good connection at the Battery.
-I have B+ power and ground at the harness to the coil pack.
-The connector at the coil pack with the 4 prongs, there's 7.0 ohms of resistance between the B+ prong and the three coil ground prongs.
-There is continuity between the firing pistons' coil connections.
- Brand new spark plug cables and brand new correctly gapped spark plugs.
Everything at the coil pack looks OK
-ICM Harness has B+ power to it.
-ICM Harness has continuity the battery ground.
-ICM Harness between pin 5 and 6 that goto the Crank Position Sensor read 0.531 K Ohms and the spec calls for between 2000 - 3000 ohms.
If not check the crank position sensor.
-At the Crank sensor itself between prongs it read 0.531 K ohms.
-No analog wave created by the sensor when cranked, it stayed at 8.09 amps.
I figured it must be the crank position sensor. 48$ later I was wrong.
New crank sensor didn't help.
It's late, ~4am so I am calling it a night. I work second shift so this isn't too terribley past my bedtime. But I'm stumped for the night, it will be figured out eventually but any thoughts? I was thinking the spec calls for 2000 - 3000 ohms and the new crank sensor is still reading really low resistance at 0.601 k oms or 601 ohms. So that'd mean there's a short in the wiring before the sensor??? If it isn't and short and its not the crank position sensor and the coil pack checks out good then that leaves the ICM. That wouldn't be cool the manual starts off describing it as a expensive and delicate piece of electrical equipment, yea o'riley's lists it at 250$ and that's not FoMoCo. The manual doesn't give any tests for the ICM itself, only notes that if the other primary circuits are working properlyt than it is probably the ICM. Any ideas on anything I am missing?
-Battery is fully charged.
-Cables are clean have have good connection at the Battery.
-I have B+ power and ground at the harness to the coil pack.
-The connector at the coil pack with the 4 prongs, there's 7.0 ohms of resistance between the B+ prong and the three coil ground prongs.
-There is continuity between the firing pistons' coil connections.
- Brand new spark plug cables and brand new correctly gapped spark plugs.
Everything at the coil pack looks OK
-ICM Harness has B+ power to it.
-ICM Harness has continuity the battery ground.
-ICM Harness between pin 5 and 6 that goto the Crank Position Sensor read 0.531 K Ohms and the spec calls for between 2000 - 3000 ohms.
If not check the crank position sensor.
-At the Crank sensor itself between prongs it read 0.531 K ohms.
-No analog wave created by the sensor when cranked, it stayed at 8.09 amps.
I figured it must be the crank position sensor. 48$ later I was wrong.
New crank sensor didn't help.
It's late, ~4am so I am calling it a night. I work second shift so this isn't too terribley past my bedtime. But I'm stumped for the night, it will be figured out eventually but any thoughts? I was thinking the spec calls for 2000 - 3000 ohms and the new crank sensor is still reading really low resistance at 0.601 k oms or 601 ohms. So that'd mean there's a short in the wiring before the sensor??? If it isn't and short and its not the crank position sensor and the coil pack checks out good then that leaves the ICM. That wouldn't be cool the manual starts off describing it as a expensive and delicate piece of electrical equipment, yea o'riley's lists it at 250$ and that's not FoMoCo. The manual doesn't give any tests for the ICM itself, only notes that if the other primary circuits are working properlyt than it is probably the ICM. Any ideas on anything I am missing?
Last edited: