Fall 2009 Online Magazine ---->

[Jim Oaks]

The Fall 2009 Online Magazine is now available HERE (http://www.therangerstation.com/Magazine/Fall2009/index.htm):

http://www.therangerstation.com/Magazine/Fall2009/index.htm

[souldoubt88]

Stoked about the blueovaltrucks.com Jim!
Cool article about Vanessa's sight as well.
Good choice on the featured vehicle, thats the ranger I dream about!

[souldoubt88]

will our TRS accounts automatically transfer to the new site, or will we have to make a new account?

[Jim Oaks]

I'm not sure how I'm going to handle this.

vBulletin has new software out that I can get for $130.00 (until 10/30/09) since I already have a license. It will offer a lot more features than the standard forum. I will also (hopefully) add the feature for iPhones.

I know if I add a full forum there, members will be flipping back and forth between both forums. It would be nice if they could both work from the same database.

I think I might have some forums here for the fullsize, restructure a little and use the same forum for both sites. I don't know yet.

If I do add a seperate forum at BOT, I'll use this database and just delete the RBV posts and save the fullsize discussions we have now and the members.

[MountainMike]

I'm not sure how I'm going to handle this.

vBulletin has new software out that I can get for $130.00 (until 10/30/09) since I already have a license. It will offer a lot more features than the standard forum. I will also (hopefully) add the feature for iPhones.

I know if I add a full forum there, members will be flipping back and forth between both forums. It would be nice if they could both work from the same database.

I think I might have some forums here for the fullsize, restructure a little and use the same forum for both sites. I don't know yet.

If I do add a seperate forum at BOT, I'll use this database and just delete the RBV posts and save the fullsize discussions we have now and the members.

I'm not sure I get this, TRS will remain as it is though right?:icon_confused:

[Jim Oaks]

I'm not sure I get this, TRS will remain as it is though right?:icon_confused:

For the most part.

The new software should add personal blogging, chat and a better members profile.

[MountainMike]

For the most part.

The new software should add personal blogging, chat and a better members profile.

Ok Cool!:D

[Kona]

tie in Vanessa's web site to TRS and I won't be allowed to read it anymore!!! Lol.

[Jim Oaks]

You might be in trouble.

















I like photos of girls and trucks just like a lot of other guys here. My wife has a lingerie business, so I have access to lingerie that could be given away, or the option to give away online gift certificates.

Imagine the possibilities? Have a thread for girls to submit a photo with a RBV for a chance to win so much of free lingerie at the end of the year. I'm not saying we're going to do that. I'm just saying.

[countryboy]

u lucky:agree: sounds like a good plain to me

[WNY964x4]

I'm not sure how I'm going to handle this.

vBulletin has new software out that I can get for $130.00 (until 10/30/09) since I already have a license. It will offer a lot more features than the standard forum. I will also (hopefully) add the feature for iPhones.

I know if I add a full forum there, members will be flipping back and forth between both forums. It would be nice if they could both work from the same database.

I think I might have some forums here for the fullsize, restructure a little and use the same forum for both sites. I don't know yet.

If I do add a seperate forum at BOT, I'll use this database and just delete the RBV posts and save the fullsize discussions we have now and the members.

so let me see if i understand this part

if you make a seperate forum at BOT , you are gonna basically copy and paste this forum onto that one , wipe out all the RBV specific posts , and keep the general layout and add all the members , if so , that is badass

[JoshT]

I hope I am understanding this right. This BOT site/forums will be in addition to TRS site/forums, not in place of right?