Reliability of 4x4 parts??? Need your input.


krikf

15+ Year Member

Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
21
Points
3,101
City
Mid NC
Vehicle Year
1994
Transmission
Automatic
I'm looking at selling my '94 3.0 ext cab and getting a 2002-2004 4.0 with 4x4. I only need the 4x4 a couple of times per year hauling firewood. I need the 4.0 to pull a 1200 lb pop-up camper in the Mts of NC. Are the 4x4 front end hubs, gears, etc likely to wear/fail more quickly than just a 4x2? Does manual vs auto matter? Will it cost me more over 10 years than the 4x2.

Also, are there different types of factory standard hubs on different year models or engines or trans types? Are some lock-out & some not?

I've never had a 4x4 so I need some good input/advice/experience on this one.

Thanks for you help.
 
I really think it would be more economical to have two vehicles, a daily commuter and your 4x4.

I really don't like the ideal of driving a 4x4 around all the time if your only going to use 4x4 a few times a year.
 
98+ will be a torsion bar 4wd setup. Yes, having a 4wd costs more in the long run BUT if you can effectively use 4wd to your advantage it is worth it. 98+ rangers will not have manual locking hubs unless a previous owner swapped them in. The same front end parts that wear out in a 2wd exist in a 4wd for the most part, its just the 4wd parts are more expensive. for example the unit bearings cost more than wheel bearings but serve the same purpose.

86
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sponsored Ad

TRS Events & Gatherings

Where We Were in 2025 – The Ranger Station

Latest posts

Featured Rangers

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

TRS Latest Video

Official TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

Latest Album Photos

IMG_4690.JPEG
IMG_4689.JPEG
IMG_4688.JPEG
IMG_4679.JPEG
IMG_4656.JPEG
IMG_4625.JPEG
IMG_4562.JPEG
IMG_4561.JPEG
IMG_4560.JPEG
IMG_4559.JPEG
IMG_4558.JPEG
IMG_4445.JPEG

Product Suggestions

Back
Top