• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

88 2.3 trans vs 2003 2.3 trans


littlered351

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I know that both of them are supposed to be M5OD transmissions. Do the bell housings bolt up? are they the same?

I'm looking at buying an 88 parts truck that has a trans in it. Thinking about chaning the output and rear housing to be used in a 4wd conversion on an 03 ranger. Just checking to see if the old transmission will bolt up to the newer motor.
 


MAKG

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,634
Reaction score
19
Points
0
Location
California central coast
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
Umm, "changing the output and rear housing" is generally a sign that you don't know what that means.

If you are going to tear down a transmission and replace it's most critical component, you might as well get the right transmission to begin with.

There is nothing insurmountable with an entire parts truck handy. But a 2WD trans is a DIFFERENT BEAST than a 4WD trans. Changing a mainshaft is MAJOR surgery. And a 2003 mainshaft is not likely to be the same as a 1988 mainshaft. That the cases might bolt up is not enough.
 

littlered351

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Points
0
you might as well get the right transmission to begin with.
.
Ford doesn't offer a M5OD 4wd version behind a 2.3 in the later years, so I can't simply "get the right transmission to begin with".
 

MAKG

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
4,634
Reaction score
19
Points
0
Location
California central coast
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
But they did behind a 2.5L in 2000. That's a LOT closer than 1988.

It's a bit strange to put 4WD on a small 4banger.... though that DID exist in 1988.

If you have never torn down a transmission and don't know how to inspect parts, swapping a mainshaft is a nice way to make a noisy and/or failure prone transmission. IF you can assemble it correctly. The first time you do this, you should use as many original parts as you can.
 

Simple_serf

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
569
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
39
Location
Sherman, NY
Transmission
Automatic
It might not fit up anyways. There was a question a little while back about the Lima and Duratec possibly having a different bolt pattern. Just something to be sure about.

88 is a lima....Ford stopped putting this in the ranger in 2001.

03 is a duratec....Current production 4 cyl.

Also, I thought they stopped putting a 4 cyl 4wd earlier...in mid 90's.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top