do they make a adapter to go from fuleinjected to carb for a 1985-92 for a 2.3
Last edited:
is this what you are asking about?
http://racerwalsh.zoovy.com/product/RWA1232A_ALUM/RWA1232A_ALUM__adaptor_efi_2bbl_1_Alum.html
if so, they also offer the same thing in a 2" tall as well.
I run pony stock motor, in my race car, if you take a fuleinjected intake with a adapter on it with a 350 holly carb it will make more RPM'S
that is what I am looking for
If you are running pony stock you need to keep that website in your favorites. They have parts for your 2300 ministock that nobody else has.
The factory EFI intake ('85 to '88 Ranger, to '93 Mustang) out performs ANY aftermarket intake. The 2300 Holley gives a huge boost in H.P. as well as increasing the the Rpm the motor can perform at. The Factory Roller cam actually reduces the usable RPM of the motor, It doesn't have the failure rate of the flat tappet type cams though.
If you are running pony stock you need to keep that website in your favorites. They have parts for your 2300 ministock that nobody else has.
The factory EFI intake ('85 to '88 Ranger, to '93 Mustang) out performs ANY aftermarket intake. The 2300 Holley gives a huge boost in H.P. as well as increasing the the Rpm the motor can perform at. The Factory Roller cam actually reduces the usable RPM of the motor, It doesn't have the failure rate of the flat tappet type cams though.
do you know where I can get a fuleinjector intaks, and any other places to get a adapter
ebay!Hmmmm...OK...so why was I told roller cams are better??? Not recently, but a few years back...everyone said they were better (on TRS anyways)...
They are better. The flat tappet cams are notorious for failure. The roller cams last forever. The motor runs smooter, less peaky. Less friction means the oil doesn't get broke down as fast which, in turn means the motor will last longer. Also, as the flat tappet cam wears down it contaminates the oil which reduces the engines life.