• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

3.0 or 3.8 into 70s Torino


occupant

New Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
45
Location
Hill County, TX
Vehicle Year
2000/1976/1976
Make / Model
Dodge/Ford/Ford
Engine Size
318-351-351
Transmission
Automatic
Cheap engineless Torino headed my way, new radiator, new exhaust, and all sorts of goodies. So I'm thinking about gas prices and about how small an engine I can get away with in a 3800-4000lb car. The car came with a 351 originally (I assume a 351W but it could have been a 351C) and has an FMX transmission still under it. Car was driveable 3 months ago before the motor was pulled for a truck, so the transmission should be fine. 351 in 1974 had 158 horsepower and around 245lbs-ft of torque. The base 302 in the Torino had 141 horsepower and around 205lbs-ft of torque.

The 3.8 Essex V6 matches the 302's numbers in CFI form, and the various EFI/SFI forms do better. I think the motor would be a great swap into the car. A 3.0 engine is a little more anemic, but if I remember my 1975 351W Torino I had in high school which was a bone-stock grandma sedan, it had more than enough power and delivered 15-17mpg. I'm wondering if putting a 3.0 in this car would be worth any trouble to install and if it would do better mileage wise than a 3.8.

3.0 likes to rev, 3.8 likes to cruise. But can a 3.0 bolt up to an AOD or FMX transmission? I think the car has 2.75 or 3.00 gears in the 9-inch, so that won't let it rev well, will it? But if it'll bolt up to the stock FMX, it'll turn decent once up to speed without overdrive, right?

3.0 is fuel injection only, probably needs 2 or 4 cats, 2 or 4 O2 sensors, etc. What else will I have to put in to make it work? If the FMX/AOD won't work, I'll have to find an A4LD and make changes to the drivetrain, right?
 


fiftyfordfloored

New Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2008
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Northern NJ
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
How about the 3.8L S/C out of a '94-95 Thunderbird Supercoupe? Torinos (like the '70-71) were very close to the weight of the Supercoupe... so it would deliver the power (230 HP / 330 TQ) and MPGs. Not to mention be cool as hell. :D

Just a thought...
 

Psychopete

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
3,201
Reaction score
29
Points
48
Location
FW, IN
Transmission
Automatic
I believe the 3.8L RWD was a Windsor bellhousing pattern. The FWDs are a Vulcan pattern, like the 3.0L. Whether anything else will line up... ?

Pete
 
Last edited:

AllanD

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
134
Points
63
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
Transmission
Manual
Actually I have seen thinfgs that strongly suggest that the Essex-3.8RWD engine is made in a pattern more like a Modular pattern as well.

I have an M5R2 trans from a supercoupe that I was given in-trade
and it WILL NOT bolt to a windsor block.

I got the trans with expectation of using it in a friends 2wd 5.0 ranger
project. The main idea was that the Supercoupe trans uses a hydraulic
clutch (the same slave as an '88-up ranger) making the trans setup FAR easier.

But it wouldn't bolt to a bare 5.0 block we had here.

Shit, even the dowel pin spacing was different.

all that being said a 3.8 might work in that car but trust me, you won't like it.

there isn't anything that has been mentioned that'll bolt to that trans.

a 4.9liter six cyl engine would...

It's in the same power ballpark (165hp) and is capable of 22+mpg
in an F-150, in a more aerodynamic torino...
and though a bit heavier than you might have wanted it'll certainly fit.


AD
 
Last edited:

Teoma

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
middle of nowhere, BC
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
2.8
Transmission
Manual
what year torino exactly because a lot of them ran the 351M which has a big block bolt pattern and definately won't bolt up to any 6 that I know of. You could try fabricating an adaptor plate to make it work
 

baddad457

Active Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,604
Reaction score
18
Points
38
Location
Opelousas La.
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
If anything you'd want the 3.8 or a 4.2 V6 in a heavy car like a 70's Torino. Those things weigh at least 4000 lbs. Just don't expect the mileage you think, heavy vehicles need gobs of bottom end torque to get em moving with the least effort, that's going to get you the gas mileage you want. Put a 3.0 in there and you'll have your foot in it so much that the mileage will be less than a bigger engine.
 

occupant

New Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
45
Location
Hill County, TX
Vehicle Year
2000/1976/1976
Make / Model
Dodge/Ford/Ford
Engine Size
318-351-351
Transmission
Automatic
I've been very satisfied with the 3.0 engines I've owned/driven. I know the long body Aerostar with the 3.0 I owned before was plenty fast enough and it was heavy. The A4LD was the weakest link on that van and it was rebuilt before I did anything else to the van (and there was MUCH else done). I just wish it would bolt up to an AOD.

I may want to stick with the 3.8. I can pull a Mustang/Thunderbird/Cougar powertrain and use the whole thing, belts to tailshaft, all the wiring, intake, etc. It should all fit right since the FMX and AOD are very close to having the same case size. The A4LD looks longer in pictures anyway.

I guess the next thing to do is decide which 3.8 to use. They had some carbureted ones in 82-83, throttle body injection for a few years, some are fuel injected, some are split port, there's all sorts of options. I don't think I want to deal with a turbocharged or supercharged setup since this is for fuel mileage. My first choice would be a 94-95 engine, since it's got the latest fuel injection system but isn't OBD II. I'll still have to work around airbag, ABS, and electronic cluster issues. I want to keep the stock gauges (speedo, fuel, temp, oil pressure, idiot lights) and maybe add a vacuum gauge where the clock would have been if the car had one.

I don't know about a 4.2 engine, those would be OBD II for sure (they came out in 97, right?). And the 4.0 engine from an Explorer wouldn't do so well for mileage, I never see people claiming 20+ in those.
 

AllanD

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
134
Points
63
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
Transmission
Manual
An aerostar is far lighter than you think it is.

It's also fairly aerodynamic as such a boxy vehicle can be...

AD
 

pillen140

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
3,263
Reaction score
45
Points
48
Age
38
Location
winston-salem, NC
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
arent aerostars made of cardboard?
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
put a bb in the torino.:icon_thumby:

aerostars are heavier then torinos.
try a 3.0 powertrain if you have one there just to see. do you have a complete powertrain of some sort?
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top