88? that doesnt sound right...i thought it was like 83 or 86 or something....its been a while.
i vote that caps are band-aids. they may dump energy faster than your battery, but its nothing that is going to improve a well set-up and properly fed "average joe" system.
the discussion wasn't about "average joe" audio systems
so your your "fact (and opinion) is irrelevant and uncoordinated.
There is nothing "Band-aid" about it, I've had a vehicle with FOUR batteries
(two under the hood, wo larger "aux" batteries in the back and a Diesel engine with a 150amp alternator and frankly the capacitor still made a difference.... but in my case it wasn't an audio system, but rather a fairly powerful radio transmitter.
What everyone here who talks down at adding a capacitor is simply
ignorant (lacking knowledge) of the facts.
Batteries store energy chemically they cannot react to load
events lasting milliseconds.
Alternators have voltage regulators that also can't react fast,
(particularly when the alternator is being turned by an engine
at idle speed.
a capacitor can in some cases can react in MICROseconds
MILLIONTHS of a second and they can dump ALL their energy
in one big spark a battery cannot come close to that
Basically it smooths out the dips and absorbs the spikes.
In a way it kinda acts like a shock absorber between the electrical system and what ever device you are running off it.
MOST things don't notice those spikes and dips.
Audio systems and two-way radios do.
AD