• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Drop i-beams question


shoyam33

New Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
93 Ranger
Transmission
Manual
I have a 93 Ranger and I bought a set of used drop beams. They look like the chassis tech ones but not sure. My question is i don't know what years they are for. On the chassis tech website they show two different pairs 83-88 and 89-97. What is the difference and how can I tell which ones I have? Thanks
 


Insanejughead

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
RBV's on Boost
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
Missouri
Vehicle Year
'94, '86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3T
Transmission
Manual
Beams for the 83-88 have the ball joints installed in them.

Beams for the 89-97 do not have balljoints installed in them. From 89 up Ford put the ball joints in the spindles.


I installed some 83-88 beams in my 94 since I had some spindles from my 85 sitting around. This way I was able to completely assemble the beam and spindle together and then save time to put them in when I did the drop.
 

Monzilla

New Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
46
Location
Holt, MI
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
I agree with Jughead. I installed early drop beams and spindles in my 89. I saved like 40lbs per side. Got way more adjustment with the slug in the spindle vs. with the slug in the beam. And it was approx 2" skinnier track width in the front.
 

volrath

New Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
menomonie, WI
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
FORD
Engine Size
2.9L
Transmission
Manual
I agree with Jughead. I installed early drop beams and spindles in my 89. I saved like 40lbs per side. Got way more adjustment with the slug in the spindle vs. with the slug in the beam. And it was approx 2" skinnier track width in the front.
2" skinnier? i never new that. what about your tires then? any problem with clearance like turning radius?
 

Insanejughead

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
RBV's on Boost
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
Missouri
Vehicle Year
'94, '86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3T
Transmission
Manual
Nope, they're not 2" skinnier. I think he is rather talking about the rear axle. The Gen I and II's are skinnier by about 3" in the back from the Gen III's and up.

Just to be sure... I'll measure the next stock Gen III I see. That will hopefully be tomorrow.
 

Monzilla

New Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
46
Location
Holt, MI
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
My rear axle has always been a smaller track width that the front. After I installed the 88 drop beams, the front was very close to the rear. Within 1inch. They are the welded beam style. 1988 spindles with 89 rotors and calipers. Unless these have been modified. (They did a real good job)
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top