351w H.O


dylanS

dylanS

10+ Year Member

Joined
Feb 11, 2011
Messages
19
Points
1,601
Age
34
City
Rolla, Mo
Vehicle Year
1993
Transmission
Manual
ok so i just purchased an 85 351w ho with a c6 for my 93 ranger 4.0 and was wondering if it was required to use a dual sump pan or if i could use a rear sump pan...thanks for any info
 
Depends on how low you want your motor to sit...If you want it low, then you might want to grab a dual, but then again, the rear sump you have may work....
SVT
 
ok thanks ill go with the rear sump cause its about 1/4 the price.lol...and one more question im goin from an injected 4.0 to a carbed 5.8 so do i just remove my computer or what
 
You will also need to either bypass the fuel pump in the tank or get a fuel pressure regulator...
SVT
 
You will need the dual sump pan. No two ways about it. A 302 doesn't even fit with the truck pan. Pan contacts the steering linkage.
 
That's what I thought, but I wasn't sure...Thanks for chiming in baddad :icon_thumby:
SVT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sponsored Ad

TRS Events & Gatherings

Where We Were in 2025 – The Ranger Station

Latest posts

Featured Rangers

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

TRS Latest Video

Official TRS Merchandise

Follow TRS On Instagram

Latest Album Photos

IMG_4690.JPEG
IMG_4689.JPEG
IMG_4688.JPEG
IMG_4679.JPEG
IMG_4656.JPEG
IMG_4625.JPEG
IMG_4562.JPEG
IMG_4561.JPEG
IMG_4560.JPEG
IMG_4559.JPEG
IMG_4558.JPEG
IMG_4445.JPEG

Product Suggestions

Back
Top