• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

10.25" gears


CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
My dd is a 2wd 5 speed '95 psd. As it sits its got 3.55 gears out back and i don't even use first gear. I'm also pulling off an impressive 20 mpg!

My thought is if i went to a higher gearset i'd get even better milage and lose nothing off the line, id just start using 1st gear. Anyone know how high i can go with a 10.25"? Anyone have personal experience with a 5speed psd and say 2.73s?
 


CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
now that i'm sitting down with a pen and paper, here are some number.

my first and second gear:
1st 5.08
2nd 2.60
my tire height:
31"

my current gear ratio
3.55

I wanted some kind of baseline number to work off of, revs per mile seems like a good candidate. right now taking off in second like i do, it takes 6009 revs to go a mile which is nuts for second gear, i think anyway. to yield the same 6009 revs per mile but in first gear i could run 1.83 gears out back and notice no difference whatsoever, except my 5 speed would be a 5 speed, not a 4 speed. on top of that my highway milage would skyrocket!

now for the reality, the highest gearset i can find for a 10.25 is what i'm already running....

cant find taller gears what do you do? find taller tires!

the magic number to maintain 6009 revs per mile is 60.5"

since this is obviously out of the question where does that leave me? i suppose an overdrive unit would get me closer, but i don't see that being cost effective.... anyone know of a good heavy duty full floater rear end available with 2.73 or higher gears?






done rambling, till one of you pipes in with some good intel
 

CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
Hmmm.... I've got a 205 laying around wasting space, i suppose i could run it back'rds and get a little more fuel economy. Might be a little more overdrive than i need though.

Someone gonna spitball with me here?
 

CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
For anyone actually reading the stupid §hit i post, today i realized i overthought a very simple point here. My first gear is 5.08, second is 2.60, divide that out and you get 1.95 between them. My backward np205 idea might actually do the trick, they're geared 1.96:1. That means if i find a divorced 205 from a 73-77 3/4 ton and run it backwards my 5 speed will actually be a 5 speed! And my 20mpg milage i get now will only go up.

Now the only questions left are for those with experience with the case: will it hold up to power going through it backwards, rotating backwards, while in low (i mean overdrive) almost constantly. Running it level should handle any oiling problems it may have, i think...
 
Last edited:

RangerSVT

Oct 09 OTOTM
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
7,883
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
TRS since 2002 - NW KY
Vehicle Year
19962002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC
Transmission
Automatic
Why not do a Tom and run dual transmissions...this way you would have 1:1 in 4th gear, and 0.72:1( I think) in 5th, while running the second trans as a regular 5 spd trans...and if you ever needed extra pulling power, you got 3 more lower gears to select.... :icon_thumby:
SVT
 

TheTopher

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
7,215
Reaction score
176
Points
0
Location
Delaware
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
Have you considered just taking off in 3rd? That's a taller gear and very easy to install, just push your shifter forward and you're done.
 

RangerSVT

Oct 09 OTOTM
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
7,883
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
TRS since 2002 - NW KY
Vehicle Year
19962002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC
Transmission
Automatic
I believe he is looking for a double overdrive, so instead of have a 0.72 ish overdrive, it'll be closer to 0.50 overdrive (like a 6th gear)...
SVT
 

CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
The double tranny idea would hold up better cut the tranny would be doing what its designed to do, but i think i want more overdrive. Running a tcase backwards puts me exactly where i want to be in terms of ratios, the downside is a tcase isnt designed to be a torque splitter. I see it whining just a bit from unusual thrust loads and such. Gonna have to do my homework but i think i can make it work
 

RangerSVT

Oct 09 OTOTM
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
7,883
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
TRS since 2002 - NW KY
Vehicle Year
19962002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC
Transmission
Automatic
The problem I see with that is if you divide your gears (not multiply as in finding crawl ratio, dividing to find overdrive ratio) so first gear becomes 2.59, and second becomes 1.33, 4th would be 0.51:1 and if 5th was 0.72, its now 0.37:1...Tom used the the 435 backwards and hasn't had any problems with it, I don't see why you would have a problem doing that with the 205...
SVT
 

CHKNFKR

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
3,962
Reaction score
73
Points
48
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
Transmission
Manual
The problem I see with that is if you divide your gears (not multiply as in finding crawl ratio, dividing to find overdrive ratio) so first gear becomes 2.59, and second becomes 1.33, 4th would be 0.51:1 and if 5th was 0.72, its now 0.37:1...

Thats the whole idea here though.

Tom used the the 435 backwards and hasn't had any problems with it, I don't see why you would have a problem doing that with the 205...
SVT
Tom still ran power from input to output, the only thing that was different was direction of revolution, and even so he had to tear both trannies apart and rearange things to make them handle thrust loads in the opposite direction.

Whatever happens, it should be a fun little project
 

RangerSVT

Oct 09 OTOTM
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
7,883
Reaction score
53
Points
48
Location
TRS since 2002 - NW KY
Vehicle Year
19962002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
GT-40 5.0L EFI W/AC
Transmission
Automatic
True, true....so I guess you will be building a reduction box, then flipping it backwards...You might not need to make any changes to it since theoretically it will be like you are driving the reduction box in reverse...
SVT
 

LOGANSTANFORTH

New Member
U.S. Military - Active
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Why not use a Gear Vendors...
 

gwaii

2010 OTOTY Winner
OTOTM Winner
2010 Truck of The Year
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
4,171
Reaction score
66
Points
0
Location
haida gwaii
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
460
Transmission
Manual
For anyone actually reading the stupid §hit i post, today i realized i overthought a very simple point here. My first gear is 5.08, second is 2.60, divide that out and you get 1.95 between them. My backward np205 idea might actually do the trick, they're geared 1.96:1. That means if i find a divorced 205 from a 73-77 3/4 ton and run it backwards my 5 speed will actually be a 5 speed! And my 20mpg milage i get now will only go up.

Now the only questions left are for those with experience with the case: will it hold up to power going through it backwards, rotating backwards, while in low (i mean overdrive) almost constantly. Running it level should handle any oiling problems it may have, i think...
you'll have no oiling or durability problems running the 205 backwards,but to get more advantage out of it you'll want to change the diffs to 4.11s.this will give a final drive ratio of about 2.25 and still keep all the gears useable.

with 3.55s in the diffs you'd end up with around 1.80s.that's a little steep for even the psd.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top