shr3dd3r 09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2011
- Messages
- 244
- City
- Huntsville, AL
- Vehicle Year
- 2000
- Transmission
- Manual
- Total Lift
- 3 Inches
- Tire Size
- 33X11.5X16 (285/75R16)
I have a 2000 Ranger 4X4 with the 3.0L. I am going to swap in a v8 from a 2000 explorer sometime very soon. I would like to keep my truck as a manual and 4X4, so I am trying to decide what transmission/transfer case combo to go with. I have heard the T5 from a mustang is the easiest way to go, but Advance Adapters no longer sells the kit to adapt it to my current transfer case (Borg Warner 1354). I have heard that the 5 speed manual out of a '97 F-150 4X4 will bolt directly onto the 302, and since the transfer case comes out of the same truck it will work as well. I guess I'd just have to worry about drive shaft modifications.
So....I need some advice. Which way would be better/cost effective/lead to better fuel efficiency/more power? I assume keeping it as a 5 speed with optional 4X4 would be more fuel efficient than going with the explorer's AWD (which is a 4-speed, right?) transmission and T-case, even thought that would be the easiest option. Let me know what you guys think.
Also, I have heard of people having trouble with using the Explorer's ECU when keeping the truck as a 5-speed, since the explorers are AWD. Would it be best for me to use a mustang or F-150 computer instead, or stick with the Explorer's? Again, which would be cost effective and efficient? I'd appreciate the help.
So....I need some advice. Which way would be better/cost effective/lead to better fuel efficiency/more power? I assume keeping it as a 5 speed with optional 4X4 would be more fuel efficient than going with the explorer's AWD (which is a 4-speed, right?) transmission and T-case, even thought that would be the easiest option. Let me know what you guys think.
Also, I have heard of people having trouble with using the Explorer's ECU when keeping the truck as a 5-speed, since the explorers are AWD. Would it be best for me to use a mustang or F-150 computer instead, or stick with the Explorer's? Again, which would be cost effective and efficient? I'd appreciate the help.