4RingCircus
Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
- Messages
- 17
- City
- Florida
- Vehicle Year
- 1987
- Engine
- 2.3 (4 Cylinder)
- Transmission
- Manual
I made the switch from the cast manifold to the shorty header. I think my truck gained some pep, and I like the fact that the headers save some weight. But I have two issues:
Thanks~ Dave
- 4 extra holes: In 1987, Ford put extra holes on the engine head, directly under the exhaust holes. The cast manifold had an integrated 'rail' or 'tube' on the bottom of the exhaust ports. This rail connected all 4 exhaust holes together, and I believe this design was to improve exhaust scavenging. Regardless of the original engineering purpose, the 'shorty' header does not cover these additional 4 holes. It directly bolts up, but the 4 extra holes are not covered by the header. I didn't notice until after I fired my truck up the first time; it was so loud, sounded like there was no header on at all..... because there basically wasn't. I did my best to add a welded edge and put some sealer in the holes, but now i've sprung a leak and have to take it out and fix it.
- This is the bigger issue: I am pulling a lean engine code. Plug tips are fairly white. Jumping into the details~ The 1987 EFI system used a MAP sensor instead of a MAF sensor. I guess if it was a MAF system, it would detect and automatically adjust for the improved air flow. But not with MAP. The air fuel mixture is simply a pre-programmed setting, and does not have the ability to 'read' the improved air flow. So, if my lean condition is from the header leak, then maybe I try to improve my welding job and try again to plug up the holes on the cylinder head. But if its from the improved flow of the header, I think that means I either A) Have to put the manifold back on, or B) is there a way to adjust or reprogram the air fuel mix on a MAP EFI system..?
Thanks~ Dave