- Joined
- Sep 21, 2007
- Messages
- 1,731
- City
- Wa, Bremerton 98310
- Vehicle Year
- 1987
- Total Lift
- Ranger 5" (1½" Hiryder/3" body), BII 4" Procomp
- Total Drop
- Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
- Tire Size
- Ranger 32"/4:10LS, BII 33"/3:73LS
- My credo
- Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
Hello,
BII: 94 Explorer's D35+8.8", 4" suspension lift, 31.5" rubber
94 Explorer for parts I thought why not use it's complete ABS system in the BII. The Bronco will be dual purpose part time DD and the primary tow rig for a modest camper/trailer.
Like I suggested, without thinking I expected it would be a positive upgrade but after sifting through the tech pages and first 10 pages of our Brake Forum posts, I would really like some objective opinions. While I am accustomed to driving vehicles with ant-lock brakes, I have had few complaints with the RABS systems of the Ranger/BII.
Off-road driving I have never wished for front ABS but on 1 or 2 occasions, I thought it may have helped on the street.
All ideas, thoughts and opinions are welcome.
BII: 94 Explorer's D35+8.8", 4" suspension lift, 31.5" rubber
94 Explorer for parts I thought why not use it's complete ABS system in the BII. The Bronco will be dual purpose part time DD and the primary tow rig for a modest camper/trailer.
Like I suggested, without thinking I expected it would be a positive upgrade but after sifting through the tech pages and first 10 pages of our Brake Forum posts, I would really like some objective opinions. While I am accustomed to driving vehicles with ant-lock brakes, I have had few complaints with the RABS systems of the Ranger/BII.
Off-road driving I have never wished for front ABS but on 1 or 2 occasions, I thought it may have helped on the street.
All ideas, thoughts and opinions are welcome.