Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.
Good God, that's about the worst argument I've ever seen.This is a book written by one that believes it never happened. I will do no more than this.....
Good God, that's about the worst argument I've ever seen.
You can find BS in print that says crop circles could never be made by humans. Even though the hoax was admitted to and demonstrated on film. By humans.
If you don't believe this guy's thesis, he DOES NOT support your argument. He's full of s**t. He "laughs" about lunar missions because that's the only argument he has for an unsupportable thesis.
I asked you to find someone WHO MATTERS. That's rather important. I guess you can't.
Reno, I'm still waiting. Your choice DIDN'T matter.And give ONE citation of anyone who matters even slightly "laughing" about space travel after 1958. Even figuratively. Names, dates, and occasions.
How is that impossible? JFK, 25 May 1961, on the floor of the US House of Representatives:You want him to get names, dates and locations of people that said things nearly 50 years ago? It's impossible. Since you disagree with him how about you prove him wrong. He made a statement, you say it's false. Prove it. discussion/
Ooh, I can hear the laughter in the wings....not.First, I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.
What are you smoking? Put it down......walk away from it...... Where did I say they "laughed at Einstein"? Conspirators is the main people saying we never went to the moon, but you want me to track an exact person and Date. OilPatch said it July 8th, 12:08pm 2008, he will write a post here icon_twisted:). That is by far easier than being a Search engine genius, I take it that you are a chemist\Physicist? You sure do come off as a know it all tell it all, jack of All trades\Master of none type, at least to me. You know the Ford Rangers, I will give you that, and I don't have a problem telling someone to ask you about a problem with their Ranger, but Dude to start talking like you have a 6 year degree in Chemistry or Physics......Man O Man. Just because I do not search for smart things to post to come off as greater than thou and try to appear to be the sharpest tool in the shed, does not mean I am stupid.Reno, I'm still waiting. Your choice DIDN'T matter.
You chose to give the "they laughed at Einstein" argument. Which itself is apocryphal. Even if it were true, just because one guy had some good ideas once doesn't mean that all ideas are good just because they are in left-field. MOST wild ideas are stupid.
A LITTLE bit of understanding logic and some semblance of critical thinking is required here.
No one is saying hydrogen can't be used to run an engine, were just saying you can't use it in your cars as an additive to get better gas milage, if you want to convert your car to run off of it then by all means do so. buy a huge solor panel to slap on your roof, and produce your own and call it a day,I ask you this: Would this school conduct these classes if it didn't work? They risk losing all credibility if it doesn't. They aren't running the vehicle purely on hydrogen created by this contraption, it's a supplement to gasoline. Worth a look in my opinion.