• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

which f150 should I get?


Snal

New Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Sacramento
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
I'm thinking about selling my ranger after saving up a little and buying an 04-08 F150. I've found 3 engines; the 4.2 V6, 4.6, V8 and the 5.4V8. I don't want the V6 and I'd prefer the 5.4 if I can find it but I wanna know how is the 4.6 in comparison? is the 4.6 like the 3.slow in rangers?
 


TheTopher

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
7,215
Reaction score
176
Points
0
Location
Delaware
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
They're all good motors that will move the truck along just fine.

There's also two 4.6 v8 motors. One's a 2 valve and one's a more powerful 3 valve, borrowed from the Mustang.
 

Toms01PSD

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
3,276
Reaction score
37
Points
0
Age
33
Location
Sanford, NC
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
7.3
Transmission
Automatic
I wouldn't consider it the 3.slow because the 4.6 is a peppy engine but it's not as peppy as the 5.4. My dad has a 08 crew cab F150 with the 4.6. It's no speed demon but it'll get up and go in it's own respect. If it's something you want to put a tuner on or make faster in any way go with the 5.4. You can tell a difference in power between the two, but not a whole lot.
 

Mr 85Ranger

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
186
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Off The Beaten Path in NC
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.8L
Transmission
Automatic
If you plan on doing any towing at all I would recommend getting the 5.4. I have had the 4.6 and 5.4 engines and the 4.6 seemed to struggle with my 16 foot trailer empty and witht the tractor it suffered terribly with any kind of incline. But with the 5.4 it was almost as if it wasn't even back there.
 

Snal

New Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
223
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Sacramento
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Automatic
thanks for the input guys. I'm into the mild prerunner kind of truck. I plan on going with the camburg 7.0 and deavers in the back if I do get the truck. it's what I wanted to do to my ranger but I've got the 2.5l and it's not worth it since I lack the power and if I buy a new truck I was gonna get a 4.0 ranger or just an f150 and the f150 seems more ideal. I don't tow a whole lot but if I tow anything I'd be towing my families small trailer with our quads and bikes on it but I think I could trust my ranger to tow it so towing isn't much of an issue for me but it would be nice to be prepared just in case
 

powerranger262

New Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
390
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Automatic
Get the f150. I've noticed a pretty good difference in acceleration and all around power between the 4.6 and the 5.4. I just bought a 07 screw with the 5.4 and love it. Lots of power and room. Just wait until you can find the bigger engine, you will be happy you did.
 

BigBlueRanger

New Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
Points
0
Location
Ontario
Vehicle Year
2006
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
5.4l good 4.6 baaad

theres no replacement for displacement

get the 5.4 my buddies selling his 4.6 so he can buy a 5.4 and finally tow his boat on the highway without having old ladies pass him
 

a-5 freak

New Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
1,129
Reaction score
23
Points
0
Location
Titusville, FL
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
I have a 2001 4.6 and it hates to go anywhere... REALLY wish I had the 5.4 with the fuel econ of the 4.6.
 

ronclark

Active Member
Supporting Member
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
919
Reaction score
25
Points
28
Location
Woodland, WA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
95 4.0 with 93 ECU
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2
Tire Size
30
I have a 5.4 in my E250 work van. it does pretty good if you hit the OD button before passing. i hate the way the auto shifts.
I get about 11 to 12 mpg with ladders and rack
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I have a 2002 F-150 with a 5.4, shy 20mpg and does what I want to do.

The 4.6's are no slouch either, my brother has a '97 and it really is pretty impressive. He just put 4.10's in it (to go with the 265/70-17 tires he put on it) and it scoots right along.

Dunno how big of a deal it really is, but he is a tech at the local dealership and they have been having a big run on timing chain tensioners and cam phasers on the 3v 5.4's.
 

shane96ranger

Well-Known Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
8,328
Reaction score
220
Points
63
Location
Utah
Vehicle Year
1997 / 1989
Make / Model
Ford F150-Stang
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
4.6 Triton / 5.0
I have a 2002 F-150 with a 5.4, shy 20mpg and does what I want to do.

The 4.6's are no slouch either, my brother has a '97 and it really is pretty impressive. He just put 4.10's in it (to go with the 265/70-17 tires he put on it) and it scoots right along.

Dunno how big of a deal it really is, but he is a tech at the local dealership and they have been having a big run on timing chain tensioners and cam phasers on the 3v 5.4's.
I concur. I just bought a 97, and it goes great. I put a load of gravel in it over the weekend, and it did well as far as power goes. It squatted a bit quicker than I'd hoped, but hat can be fixed.

85, I have 3.55's right now. What did your brother have before the 4.10's? Did it affect fuel mileage much after the change? Or is it too soon to tell?
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I concur. I just bought a 97, and it goes great. I put a load of gravel in it over the weekend, and it did well as far as power goes. It squatted a bit quicker than I'd hoped, but hat can be fixed.

85, I have 3.55's right now. What did your brother have before the 4.10's? Did it affect fuel mileage much after the change? Or is it too soon to tell?
3.55's, he just put them in last weekend, it has only seen one day of active duty so far. He threw a L/S carrier in the rear too.

It downshifts much less often with the cruise though, I think it would have to help.
 

shane96ranger

Well-Known Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
8,328
Reaction score
220
Points
63
Location
Utah
Vehicle Year
1997 / 1989
Make / Model
Ford F150-Stang
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
4.6 Triton / 5.0
3.55's, he just put them in last weekend, it has only seen one day of active duty so far. He threw a L/S carrier in the rear too.

It downshifts much less often with the cruise though, I think it would have to help.
I'll have to remember to ask you later. I just went through my first tank and got 15.6 mpg with a 50/50 mix of city/hwy driving. Not a whole lot worse than my Ranger which was always between 16 and 17 mpgs.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I'll have to remember to ask you later. I just went through my first tank and got 15.6 mpg with a 50/50 mix of city/hwy driving. Not a whole lot worse than my Ranger which was always between 16 and 17 mpgs.
Strangly his all time best to date was 19mpg loaded down with both halves of his toolbox in the back coming back from college with the stock 255/70-16's.

I think pre swap he was in the 15-16mpg range with the bigger tires.
 

BRONCMAN

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Imo the 4.6 is to f150s as what the 3.slow is to rangers. My neighbor had one & my old boss did as well. On my bosses we used it before to tow a 2 place snowmobile trailer with 2 sleds to go riding. Anyways, 6% grade=50 mph tops. The 5.4 is the only way to go with that era f150. Everyone I personally know who has one wishes they got the 5.4.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top