• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

What did you do to your 2019 and up Ranger today?


Robertmangrum.rm

Wannabe Overlander
Supporting Member
RBV's on Boost
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
1,282
Reaction score
1,610
Points
113
Age
48
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5 level kit with rear add a leaf appox. 1.5
Tire Size
305/70r17
My credo
Buy it, build it, and drive it like you stole it


Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.

CMOS

Active Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Messages
134
Reaction score
118
Points
43
Location
Magnolia, Texas
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ranger 4x4
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic

Robertmangrum.rm

Wannabe Overlander
Supporting Member
RBV's on Boost
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
1,282
Reaction score
1,610
Points
113
Age
48
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5 level kit with rear add a leaf appox. 1.5
Tire Size
305/70r17
My credo
Buy it, build it, and drive it like you stole it
Question about those lights: Do you get wind noise from them at highway speeds?

CMOS
Honestly I wouldn't be able to tell from the hum of the mud tires right now but haven't noticed any.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
Honestly I wouldn't be able to tell from the hum of the mud tires right now but haven't noticed any.
Aaah... the gentle relaxing hum of MT's at 55 😌 almost enough to put a guy to sleep after a long day at work lol.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
12,635
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
Inspected the brakes and cleaned and lubed the contact points and under the hardware to prevent rust. The slider pins were cleaned, lubed and inspected as well.

Not quite 60 K on the odometer and the rear brakes are about done. Better than the 2011’s track record on pads and discs but not as good as drum brakes I’ve had in the past. It’s what they came with. So, I’ll just have to deal with it. I’m guessing they will need to be changed about this time next year.

I also installed the factory “all terrain” tires and put the winter wheels in storage.
 

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
2,840
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
Inspected the brakes and cleaned and lubed the contact points and under the hardware to prevent rust. The slider pins were cleaned, lubed and inspected as well.

Not quite 60 K on the odometer and the rear brakes are about done. Better than the 2011’s track record on pads and discs but not as good as drum brakes I’ve had in the past. It’s what they came with. So, I’ll just have to deal with it. I’m guessing they will need to be changed about this time next year.

I also installed the factory “all terrain” tires and put the winter wheels in storage.
I had mine inspected in March and they found both inner rear brake pads were worn out from the calipers sticking. Outers looked good.
 

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
2,840
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
Truck was still detailed from Carlisle last week so I gave it a bath and a spray of tire shine and went to the cruise in Beaver Falls, PA.

IMG_5925.jpeg


Looks awful tall parked between two Corvettes.
 
Last edited:

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
12,635
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
I had mine inspected in March and they found both inner rear brake pads were worn out from the calipers sticking. Outers looked good.
They aren't wearing evenly back there, even with biannual inspection, cleaning, and lubing on mine either. I think it might be a quirk of the design. It's not a massive difference but there is a difference.
 

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
2,840
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
They aren't wearing evenly back there, even with biannual inspection, cleaning, and lubing on mine either. I think it might be a quirk of the design. It's not a massive difference but there is a difference.
I checked Stainless Steel Brakes Corporation but they only have stuff for full size Ford trucks.
www.ssbc-usa.com
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
12,635
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17

JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,330
Reaction score
2,840
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
I didn’t know stainless was even an option on anything.
SSBC got started by making stainless steel inserts for brake calipers for Corvettes. A lot of Vettes sit a lot and owners were finding out that the calipers were sticking from corrosion caused by lack of use. They make all kinds of stuff now but nothing for Rangers.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
My rear pads were smoked at 36k miles, slides absolutely not sticking. The slide bores, the slides themselves, and the grease.. all immaculate. Changed the pads myself with much swearing about the stupid spin-em-in pistons.

The last time I took it in for a service.. around 38k.. the tech (for the first time ever) actually measured how much pad was on its backer on all 4 corners... ready for this?.... the fronts had 8mm, the rears had 9mm.

My truck had gone through *at least* 9mm of pad in the rear over 38k miles while only using a measly 1 or 2mm up front 🤷‍♀️

A somewhat popular theory on the '5g' site is that the trucks can/will/do engage the traction control much more frequently than what's indicated by the dash light, leading to the incredible amount of wear on the rears.

I'm personally not sure how strong of a theory that is.. considering that my modulation of the trucks gas pedal was on-par with how an 80 year old man does it.. but who knows.

Definitely the first vehicle I've owned thats needed rears first.
 

CMOS

Active Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2022
Messages
134
Reaction score
118
Points
43
Location
Magnolia, Texas
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ranger 4x4
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
Took my 2023 FX4 to an unimproved beach on Sargent Island, Sargent, TX. Deep, dry, soft sand. The beach is about 20 miles long.

My truck never missed a beat in that deep sand. Put her in 4x4 and locked the Rear End. No problems at all. I'm a happy camper being back in the 4x4 club.

CMOS
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,853
Reaction score
12,635
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
My rear pads were smoked at 36k miles, slides absolutely not sticking. The slide bores, the slides themselves, and the grease.. all immaculate. Changed the pads myself with much swearing about the stupid spin-em-in pistons.

The last time I took it in for a service.. around 38k.. the tech (for the first time ever) actually measured how much pad was on its backer on all 4 corners... ready for this?.... the fronts had 8mm, the rears had 9mm.

My truck had gone through *at least* 9mm of pad in the rear over 38k miles while only using a measly 1 or 2mm up front 🤷‍♀️

A somewhat popular theory on the '5g' site is that the trucks can/will/do engage the traction control much more frequently than what's indicated by the dash light, leading to the incredible amount of wear on the rears.

I'm personally not sure how strong of a theory that is.. considering that my modulation of the trucks gas pedal was on-par with how an 80 year old man does it.. but who knows.

Definitely the first vehicle I've owned thats needed rears first.
Since I’ve had vehicles with rear disc brakes, the rear brakes wearing before the fronts has been the norm. But the wear on the 2019 hasn’t been as bad as you have experienced.

As a guess, it may be because I have the tool kit to crank the pistons back and and they get exercised at each brake inspection but that is just a guess.

The 2011 has been closer but the truck does sit for months at a time while I’m deployed and since there is nothing to keep the weather out, the rotors get pretty rusty. The 2019, being an automatic, has someone to run it at least once a week while I’m gone and keep the rust build up to a minimum.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top