• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Uh Oh.....MPG controversy....


Rackster

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
42
Reaction score
5
Points
8
Location
Connecticut
Vehicle Year
2019
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Took a trip to New Hampshire in the Ranger. Watching the split time data, I was getting 31-38 mpgs up and back in mostly highway driving. Presently the average mpgs are at 27.4. Average speed is at 32 mph in mixed driving. Honestly it doesn’t take much effort to average in the lower 30s mpgs on the highway. The ecoboost continues to impress.
 


copyman

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2021
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
Points
3
Location
FL
Vehicle Year
2019
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Currently getting 19 City, 21 Mixed and 23 Highway on my 4x4 Sport with +1 Sized tires at 265/65/17 (OEM size was 255/65/17) with a dead-on corrected speedometer via FPP Tune calibrator. I suspect the OEM speedometer calibration reads a little fast and would cause a slightly inflated MPG number over the span of a tank. I don't go by the trucks estimating either its always high as well. Hand calculations only.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,849
Reaction score
12,630
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
The onboard mpg calculator is definitely high. Usually by about a mpg or two. Close enough to get an idea how you are doing but not if you want accurate numbers. I don't think anyone who has commented on the subject, regardless of vehicle manufacturer, has ever reported that they were accurate. Some worse than others.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,503
Reaction score
6,359
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
The onboard mpg calculator is definitely high. Usually by about a mpg or two. Close enough to get an idea how you are doing but not if you want accurate numbers. I don't think anyone who has commented on the subject, regardless of vehicle manufacturer, has ever reported that they were accurate. Some worse than others.
I'm relatively sure there's a process to calibrate the on-board system, people that have done it say it's then within .5mpg or so.
 

HenryMac

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
566
Reaction score
382
Points
63
Location
Central Colorado
Vehicle Year
2019, '31, '27
Make / Model
Ranger, A & T
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo, 350, 5.0 HO
Transmission
Automatic
Total Drop
Stock, about a foot, about a foot
Tire Size
LT 265/65 R17, P285/70R15 & P195/65R15, 820-15 & 500-15
Took a trip to New Hampshire in the Ranger. Watching the split time data, I was getting 31-38 mpgs up and back in mostly highway driving. Presently the average mpgs are at 27.4. Average speed is at 32 mph in mixed driving. Honestly it doesn’t take much effort to average in the lower 30s mpgs on the highway. The ecoboost continues to impress.
Hand calculated or truck computer? My average is about the same as yours, 27 mpg.

But 31-38 mpg? :icon_surprised: On our 2019 Ranger... maybe downhill, with a stiff tail wind.
 
Last edited:

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,774
Reaction score
4,955
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
The problem I’ve found with the onboard mpg calculators are they are based on how much gas the car “thinks” it’s using. So if you over fill the tank, or there is something wrong with the float, you get crappy readings.


Biggest thing I’ve seen effects them is if the tank gets over filled, even a little.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top