• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Symmetric vs asymmetric tread


Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.


JohnnyO

Moderator Emeritus
Supporting Member
Forum Staff - Retired
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 6, 2002
Messages
6,315
Reaction score
2,812
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicle Year
2020
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5"
Tire Size
265/70-17
My credo
"220, 221, whatever it takes."
What makes a good snow tire? I would have thought that it'd have the same characteristics as a mud or sand tire. By looking at pics, most snow tires have many fine grooves and some have studs. My current guess is these snow tires are meant for street usage and bite into a thin layer of compacted, icy snow. Would offroading in deep snow need the same type of tire as mud?
For a good snow tire you want a tread with a large number of small edges, like an A/T or dedicated snow tire.
M/T's have a small number of large edges and will skate on top of the snow.

Directional tires will have arrows molded in the sidewall for the rotation direction. You can only rotate them front-to-rear on the same side.
Asymmetrical tires are not directional (except in rare ultra-hi performance cases) but have an inside and an outside and can be rotated side-to-side. I have Yokohama Avid Ascends for summer tires on my daughter's car and they are marked Inside and Outside on the sidewall.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,695
Reaction score
12,386
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
What makes a good snow tire? I would have thought that it'd have the same characteristics as a mud or sand tire. By looking at pics, most snow tires have many fine grooves and some have studs. My current guess is these snow tires are meant for street usage and bite into a thin layer of compacted, icy snow. Would offroading in deep snow need the same type of tire as mud?
While I'm not a perfect expert on the subject, I can give you the general gist.

1. The tread compound is softer for better flexibility and grip in cold weather since rubber gets harder as it gets colder just like much everything else. That is also why they need to be swapped out for another tire as soon as practical once the snow stops and the weather is getting warmer. They will wear out in not time.

2. The tread pattern is made of small blocks and small groves to trap the snow instead of expelling it like a mud tire does. From my reading, snow is the best thing to grip snow, thus why the tires are designed to trap it and keep it on/in the tire tread.

3. The tread also has a lot of sipping in the tread blocks for trapping even more snow and to help with ice traction.

4. Winter/snow tires also provide a provision for metal studs to be inserted in the tread for better performance on ice. The catch is that they must be installed when the tire is new to prevent potential damage to the tooling that installs the studs. If there is any rocks or debris in the stud holes, they will damage the installation tool. Also, if you live in an area that doesn't have the roads covered in snow and ice a lot during the winter season, the studs will wear down pretty quickly and will be useless in a season or two.

That's about it in a nut shell.

As far as the off roading part, a winter tire performs pretty well. Not the best choice for sure, but in a pinch they will get you down the trail pretty far. A good All Terrain would better and have preformed pretty similarly to a winter tire in the ice and snow but will have a better tread design for dirt and mud and better durability due to their more rugged construction. As far as a mud tire, off road they might be fine but are not great in snow and ice on road. Tread design makes a difference but the tread design was made for a different purpose, most of it the opposite of what you want in a winter tire.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.

Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.
But it's a directional tire, I thought you didn't want directional tires.
I think he prefers "symetrical" over "directional", but I'm kinda confused if he's wanting them or just wants to know "if" they exist.
 

Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.
Unfortunately does not come in 15".
15"ers are becoming as obsolete as the 14". Most stock rims are 17" or bigger these days and that's what the tire companies are wanting to sell.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Did I say that? If so I must have had brain fade. The original objective was find off-road tires that will look the same side-to-side and there's no way that can happen without them being symmetric, unless they are symmetric longitudinally but not side-to-side. A lot of tires spec'd by mfg as directional are not symmetric in any sense so they will not look the same on both sides.

All symmetric tires will be directional if not per mfg then directional because of the fact they (almost always) aren't symmetric in a longitudinal sense - it would look (and maybe act?) very strange to put them on mounted the same face both sides, think of v-tractor tires, you'd never do that. True you can only rotate on the same side unless you remount them.

I'm making the distinction between directional tires where the mfg has arrows on them (don't know if these do) and those are often -not- symmetric (won't look the same side to side); and tires that are directional just because you'd want to mount them so they look/act the same side to side but there's no arrows on them or requirement to do so except how you want them to perform.

The only way you can have a symmetric tire that is not directional (in either sense, per above) is if it is not only symmetric side to side but also longitudinally. Then it doesn't matter how it's mounted because it's always the same. You don't see that much, if you do it's readily recognizable and makes for a king of boring tread pattern, which is maybe why they don't do it. Military tires would be an example. Which I don't think you find in my size. I'm not convinced they are horrible, especially if you watch those old WW2 vids of them going through mud, they at least seem good for that, but probably not a great highway tire.

This (XS) is the only symmetric off-road tire I found so far (not counting military). They will look the same side-to-side, assuming you mount them to look that way, which you would. It's very rare. Of all tires I have seen, this is the only one that qualifies so far (and of course doesn't come in my size and probably not appropriate for me either).

There are only four combinations:
1. Not symmetric in any sense (most tires). It doesn't matter how you mount them, they'll never look the same. Most mfg-spec directional tires are such as well as most tires period.
2. Symmetric side-to-side only (like the XS). You mount them so they look the same (different faces). Very rare if not nonexistent in a tire I could use.
3. Symmetric longitudinally only. You also mount these to look the same. Some (not many) mfg-spec directional tires may be such, but they're usually racing or special-purpose tires.
4. Symmetric in both senses. Doesn't matter how you mount them they always look the same (military, perhaps others, but you don't see them much if at all).

I am pretty much resolved to the fact, I'm not going to find off-road tires that fit my truck that will look the same on both sides of the truck. That's life, accept it, and move on.
Unless someone finds one for me.

Yeah I want them, if they're out there. It could be any of types 2,3, or 4 above. Probably would be type 2.
 
Last edited:

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
If I change to 17" rims my take is that's going to give me less sidewall flex which is worse for off road.
 

Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.
If I change to 17" rims my take is that's going to give me less sidewall flex which is worse for off road.
I understand that thought, BUT, ALL of the current FX4 packages ( F-150, Ranger, & Maverick ) come with 17" rims/tires.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
So now I'm just more confused. I think you could even get 18" on the new Rangers?
I'll have to look and see what are the diameters on them.
Why are they doing this, it seems contrary to what you'd want? I'll be interested to hear others weigh in on this.
Still not sure I will find more symmetric tires that way but will look.
Bigger rims might look better.... but not sure I'd want to eat the cost of 4 (or more likely 5) rims just for looks.
Can't really go bigger than 31" without going outside the "green" range for my 3.73 and my stock lift.
No doubt that every inch you gain below the differentials is a help, but at some point you'll sacrifice on-road performance.
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,739
Reaction score
4,885
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
The bigger wheels allow for larger brakes. On the later rangers with the 12" brakes the 15" wheels were modified with a lip inside the wheel for clearance, not all 15" wheels will fit.

The newer trucks are much more powerful, and also much heavier, so they need bigger brakes.


Of course some people like the look of the giant wheels small tires, so there is always that too.
 

Blmpkn

Toilet enthusiast
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
5,495
Reaction score
6,347
Points
113
Location
Southern maine
Vehicle Year
2023
Make / Model
Ford Bronco
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5"
Tire Size
285/75/18
My credo
Its probably better to be self deprecating than self defecating.
If I change to 17" rims my take is that's going to give me less sidewall flex which is worse for off road.
Well.. it depends how big the tire is. A tire on a 17 can have more sidewall than a tire on a 15" wheel.

That being said... a 17" wheel in a 31" would leave you plenty of sidewall for the kind of wheeling you'll be doing I'd imagine. I have 18"s and 32" tires and they're just fine.
 

James Morse

1997 XLT 4.0L 4x4 1999 Mazda B3000 2wd
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
1,891
Reaction score
973
Points
113
Location
Roanoke VA
Vehicle Year
1997 and 1999
Make / Model
XLT 4x4 & B3000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L in XLT, 3.0L in B3000
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31x10.5-15 K02's on the Ranger, 235/75R15 on Mazda
My credo
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
You have different truck than me though.... I guess I'm concerned about going to 32" but if clearances are ok I suppose it's possible.
I'm wondering if apart from looks does it gain me anything. And that's if one thinks they look better.
The tires you have would run quite a bit higher price than 265/75R15.
Plus rims, that could be a grand easy, I figure probably 2500-3k by the time you get done.
Not sure what a larger rim does for me off-road, seems like, nothing, if the diameters are the same, like 265/65R17 vs 265/75R15 vs 275/65R17. The last one is 31.1", diameter ok, but would width be ok too at 275? Wider tire might be worse for off road...
It does open up different possibilities if I change rims just not sure it's worth it from a performance-only standpoint.
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,739
Reaction score
4,885
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
you may find tires for larger wheels could be cheaper, smaller sidewall for the same size, also more volume.

You could also look around for used wheels/ tires. 5x4.5" lug pattern is very common, jeeps use them as well. Shouldn't be too hard to find a used set of 16" or 17" wheels with that lug pattern.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top