• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Really short bed ranger??


Lil-Pony

Active Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
5
Points
38
Age
30
Location
San Antonio, TX
Vehicle Year
1984
Make / Model
Take a Guess
Engine Size
2.8 soon to be 4bt
Transmission
Automatic
"absolute advantage off road"...? The magic off road wheelbase is widely accepted as 105-110". Regardless of vehicle make/model

If a person was motivated by having a wheelbase that would give them "an absolute advantage off road"
A person would be better off modifying a std. Cab ranger frame, rather than stretching a bii Frame 17", fabbing up towers to get the body mounts to line up, body lifting it to clear the bii fuel tank, and body working quarters that have a fuel door in the correct place

You could easiley stretch the wheel base to 100" from the stock 94"
 


cammeddrz

Active Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Nov 26, 2009
Messages
1,808
Reaction score
23
Points
38
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford/chevy
Engine Size
efi 350vortec
Transmission
Manual
Yep, but not easily to 105", let alone 110"

And certainly not by moving the front ttb forward. That's quite an undertaking too

And even if a person stretched a bii frames wheelbase. The shape of the frame means that the back 6 body mounts sit about 6" above the frame. So tall body mount towers would need to be fabricated.

The fuel doors are in different spots....all that work to stretch the wheelbase, and then even modify it to accept ranger parts, just to have at best a 100 "wheelbase

Or if a person was against pointlessly wasting time/money/effort

They could Get a ranger frame that is already 107", fuel tank/door in the right place, frame contours match the body mounting of ranger cab/bed.

To summarize:
I mean using as bronco ii frame to Get as close to the magic wheelbase, and putting ranger body parts on it, is a huge waste of time
 
Last edited:

Hagan

08/2013 OTOTM Winner
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
11
Points
0
Location
Salem, OR
Vehicle Year
1986
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
To summarize:
I mean using as bronco ii frame to Get as close to the magic wheelbase, and putting ranger body parts on it, is a huge waste of time
This is why I own a shortbed standard cab Ranger. Its the perfect wheelbase.
 

AllanD

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
7,897
Reaction score
134
Points
63
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
Transmission
Manual
Most guys seem to use ex cab rangers when they do this
A Supercab ranger won't work for this without cutting the wheel-arches
into the rear cab corners or about a foot of body lift.

If I was going to make an ultra-shortbox Supercab I'd use an Explorer frame not a Bronco2....

The frame on a Gen1 (1991-94) Explorer 4dr would already have a D35 up front and a 31-spline 8.8" out back... and the 4.0 would be literally Plug-And-Play with an '89-92 cab...

AD
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top