• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

It's Official: I'm joining the 3.0 side in the 2.9 / 3.0 debate!


stegomon

Active Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
2,177
Reaction score
20
Points
38
Age
39
Location
auburn/minot maine
Vehicle Year
1987/1990
Make / Model
fords and only
Transmission
Manual
3.0 my ass....hate them motors....after having a spun rod bearing and cant find a damn 3.0 any place....og i can find 2.9s and 4.0s all damn day...but not 3.0.....i am good with the 3.0 truck agien
 


Wicked_Sludge

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,937
Reaction score
43
Points
0
Age
38
Location
Westport, WA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3-point-GO
Transmission
Manual
you want to know why you can find tons of 4.0 and 2.9's in the junkyards, but no 3.0s?

cause i can tell you why :icon_thumby: but im sure youve guessed by now :D
 
Last edited:

Beef52751

Active Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
1,756
Reaction score
13
Points
38
Age
33
Location
Eastern Iowa
Vehicle Year
86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
any motor will fail if a cam bearing spins. is how they are all designed, we have SBCs do it all the time.
Beef
 

BeaterMan

New Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
488
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
colorado
Vehicle Year
1985,1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.8, 4.6, 5.0
Transmission
Manual
you want to know why you can find tons of 4.0 and 2.9's in the junkyards, but no 3.0s?

cuause i can tell you why but im sure youve guessed
+1 lol.
 

Mutant Pony

Active Member
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
9
Points
38
Age
58
Location
Hersey, Mi
Vehicle Year
1977
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2300
Transmission
Manual
I don't hate 2.9s, I'm just allergic to cologne!
The 3.0 that is in my '87 now ('91 Ranger engine) is a really nice motor. It is quite efficient for what it is. It does everything I ask of it. It doesn't eat up tires like a low end torque motor!
The reason I put a 3.0 in my '86 in the first place was because the junkyards were full of them, I had three good running engines given to me.
The cologne engines around here sell for far more then the vehicle they came out of was worth.
 

177CIOfPureLove

New Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
354
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Bayville, NJ
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L
Transmission
Manual
I like the 3.0. But I Love the 2.9. The only advantage I can think of the 3.0 actually has over the 2.9 is the heads. Either way with care each motor will go for as long as its maintenance allows. But for as long as I can keep my truck rolling, its power will be supplied by the 2.9. EEC IV is so simple to work on, just the basics. The management system does impress me very much, especially compared to the TBI Chevy crap they threw out at the same time.
 

Mechanickid

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
976
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Martinsburg W.V
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
you want to know why you can find tons of 4.0 and 2.9's in the junkyards, but no 3.0s?

cause i can tell you why :icon_thumby: but im sure youve guessed by now :D
:thefinger:

That because the transmissions used behind the early 2.9's and 4.0's were SH!T, Either a Mitsubishi or a A4LD and when something like that goes in an older truck its easier to just replace the truck than that part.
 

Wicked_Sludge

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,937
Reaction score
43
Points
0
Age
38
Location
Westport, WA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3-point-GO
Transmission
Manual
the 4.0's and 3.0's had the same transmission options (A4LD/M5OD) :icon_thumby:
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Chazy New York
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
i will have to go with the 3.0. :icon_thumby: i have a 3.0 im my truck and i cant kill it I've tryed. it has 206 thousand plus miles on it :headbang:
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,398
Reaction score
7,493
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
the 4.0's and 3.0's had the same transmission options (A4LD/M5OD) :icon_thumby:
Thats cause they didnt have the power to tear them up :icon_rofl:

The 2.9L is a strong runner, the 3.0 is reliable but they just dont have the power.

Seems like with a 3.0 you step on the gas and your waiting and waiting, and finally it hits its powerband, you acclerate decent for like 2 seconds, and then it shifts and you do it all over.

Im a 2.9 man.

later,
Dustin
 

holyford86

Some guy with a problem
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
2,213
Reaction score
610
Points
113
Age
37
Location
Plattsburgh, NY
Vehicle Year
many
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
7
Tire Size
33x12.50R15
when's the last time you saw a fm145/146 behind a 3.0? the transmissions are garbage, I've owned both and they suck. Got an m50d in the same truck and its alot better.
 

Dangeranger3

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2007
Messages
620
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Peoria, IL
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
420
Transmission
Manual
2.9 all the way!!!
 

Mechanickid

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2008
Messages
976
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Martinsburg W.V
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
Most of the junkyards in my area don't have any rangers older than 93. They just don't have any demand for 1st and 2nd gen. parts. There are very few 1st gens in my area period thats why I try to take care of mine. Even if my 2.9 Fm 146 combo does fail, Ill just find a battered explorer and rob the 4.0 M5OD 1354 from it and stuff it in my 88.
 

Mutant Pony

Active Member
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
9
Points
38
Age
58
Location
Hersey, Mi
Vehicle Year
1977
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2300
Transmission
Manual
when's the last time you saw a fm145/146 behind a 3.0? the transmissions are garbage, I've owned both and they suck. Got an m50d in the same truck and its alot better.
My '87 has the factory original Mitsu trans will well over 200,000 miles on it. The only thing done to it is the shifter has been replaced, twice. The 3.0 is much easier on the trans than a lowend torque type motor.
My 3.0 has no problem pulling out into traffic. I've never made anyone slow down for me, unless they were going way over the speedlimit.:thefinger:
 

Wicked_Sludge

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
6,937
Reaction score
43
Points
0
Age
38
Location
Westport, WA
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3-point-GO
Transmission
Manual
Seems like with a 3.0 you step on the gas and your waiting and waiting, and finally it hits its powerband, you acclerate decent for like 2 seconds, and then it shifts and you do it all over.
clutch in, drop 2 gears, clutch out, hammer down, hang on :icon_thumby:
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top