• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

How to Make a 2004 FX4 Level 1 to FX4 Level 2... Simplified Please, already Confused


hlenhart

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
ford
Transmission
Automatic
Thx U otis413 , for a Real answer to my question about free wheeling....
but I still would like to find REAL info on FX4 Level 1 vs Level 2, i spent Most of the day on it, seems I can't get a straight Answer on it, even from FORD
 


hlenhart

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
ford
Transmission
Automatic
THX U, Ron D
 

Otis413

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 2, 2018
Messages
187
Reaction score
123
Location
Cass, WVa
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
I much prefer the "live" front end over man or auto hubs, shift on the fly is nice!
 

Curious Hound

Formerly EricBphoto
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
16,732
Reaction score
19,314
Age
60
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
I much prefer the "live" front end over man or auto hubs, shift on the fly is nice!
It does have advantages and the rotating mass is negligible concerning fuel mileage. But those of us with lockers or limited slip front diffs really benefit from being able to unlock one or both front hubs.
 

Otis413

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 2, 2018
Messages
187
Reaction score
123
Location
Cass, WVa
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
In '04 it was called "FX4 off road" rather then FX4 Level II, and the Thorsen dif wasn't a standard option. I'm not sure without looking it up if it was an option.. The Off Road package had skid plates and 4.10:1 gears if I remember right, everything else was a special order option. (again, if I remember right..)
 

Otis413

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 2, 2018
Messages
187
Reaction score
123
Location
Cass, WVa
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
It does have advantages and the rotating mass is negligible concerning fuel mileage. But those of us with lockers or limited slip front diffs really benefit from being able to unlock one or both front hubs.
That's true! Personally, if I were going that far, I'd do the solid axle conversion. But not everybody has the tools, money and time to do that..
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
8,412
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Look at the 2004 Ranger Brochure, clear as day for what the Level II had that FX4 off-road didn't have in that year
Just follow the "dots", lol
 

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,339
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
It does have advantages and the rotating mass is negligible concerning fuel mileage. But those of us with lockers or limited slip front diffs really benefit from being able to unlock one or both front hubs.
I always imagined trying to drive on the street with live axles and a locker up front would be the equivalent of trying to steer a tank through an F1 road course...
 

Otis413

Well-Known Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 2, 2018
Messages
187
Reaction score
123
Location
Cass, WVa
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
I remember "back in the day" the guys at 4x4 & off road magazine tried putting a locker in the front of a 70s full time 4 wheel drive Dodge pickup.... How'd that turn out??? Not to good... 😜
 

hlenhart

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2014
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
ford
Transmission
Automatic
im startin to Realize I been searchin for every 2004 FX4 for a Year & FX4 doesn't Really mean Anything, besides being a Normal 4x4 with only 2 wheels out of 4 spinning .. thought i did my research, at least I got a Perfectly Cherry truck with a Trailer Hitch, ... if u saw 2004 engine compartment, u'd swear it was only 3 years old
 

Uncle Gump

Boomers gotta Boom
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
15,008
Reaction score
15,379
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
The next thing you should read up on is the 4.0L SOHC... the early years had trouble with the timing chain tensioners and guides. If one of those lets go... it will not make you happy.
 

Uncle Gump

Boomers gotta Boom
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
15,008
Reaction score
15,379
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
That said... I like my 4.0L sohc... highest output in both torque and horse power in any Ranger.

Just keep up maintenance and don't drive it like you stole it.

Great engine...
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
8,412
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
+1 ^^^ Uncle Gump

Plan on changing the 2 long chain tensioners within the next few months, not hard to do
Use Motorcraft only tensioners
Do this every 100k miles
 

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,339
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
Now if you wanna talk about dumb ideas Ford has come up with, putting a timing chain on the back of the engine pretty much takes the cake. :icon_rofl:
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,364
Reaction score
8,412
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
No, I think all automakers lost the plot when they change to overhead valves, flathead engines were WAY easier to work on
Fords flathead V8 was 110HP, who needs more power than that
Its all the "go faster" young "pups" that have ruined things, OHV was only reason for a timing chain to begin with

Then they have DOHC with timing chains longer than my.........well long ones
Only thing good I see on the horizon is electric valves, so back to the simplicity of NO timing chains :)
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Rick W
October Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

25th Anniversary Merch

Follow TRS On Instagram

25th Anniversary Sponsors

TRS-3 Ford Ranger Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top