- Joined
- Jan 6, 2002
- Messages
- 6,466
- Reaction score
- 3,104
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Vehicle Year
- 2020
- Make / Model
- Ranger
- Engine Type
- 2.3 EcoBoost
- Transmission
- Automatic
- 2WD / 4WD
- 4WD
- Total Lift
- 1.5"
- Tire Size
- 265/70-17
- My credo
- "220, 221, whatever it takes."
Back in the day if you hit 100,000 miles and rolled the odometer over, you threw a party and invited all the neighbors.I'm most comfortable working on stuff from the late 50's to early/mid 80's but I have no illusions that cars were better in the past. I lost count of the number of valve jobs I did on 30,000 mile 302s and 351s- the worn valve guides would show up when adjusting the fast idle during the 30k tune up. Structural frame rust was a concern on 5 year old cars- I bought a 30,000 mile 66 Chevy with a rotten frame for the $35 wrecker bill. I towed in a 3 year old 30,000 mile Chevy with a no start, replace the timing chain so it would run, then tore it down and replaced the bent valves. Old cars would rust out in less time than the paint begins to fade on a modern car. Older cars were easier to work on but they needed a lot more work.
I never knew anyone who had their engine rebuilt because where I live the bodies were shot long before the engines wore out.