• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

How do 4x4 ranger frames vary between generations?


scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,030
Reaction score
4,367
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
Yeah, the '89-92 isn't any different, crumple zone came in the front frame horns around '91 if I remember right but other than the front bumper mount on the frame these are the same as '83-88...

The two piece frame started after '98 sometime, they weren't always that way.

For what you are doing I don't think it matters much, they will all have a bunch of stuff to take off, 4x4 and 4x2 frames in the TIB/TTB years ('97 and older) had different engine crossmembers between 4x4 and 4x2 but the frame rails are the same, 4x4 in front of the engine crossmember is boxed on the passenger side and not on the 4x2. '98-11 are all rack and pinion and older have a steering box, but if you're going full hydro like I would expect that wouldn't matter...
 


Xjvince

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
9
Reaction score
5
Points
3
Location
Oregon
Yeah, the '89-92 isn't any different, crumple zone came in the front frame horns around '91 if I remember right but other than the front bumper mount on the frame these are the same as '83-88...

The two piece frame started after '98 sometime, they weren't always that way.

For what you are doing I don't think it matters much, they will all have a bunch of stuff to take off, 4x4 and 4x2 frames in the TIB/TTB years ('97 and older) had different engine crossmembers between 4x4 and 4x2 but the frame rails are the same, 4x4 in front of the engine crossmember is boxed on the passenger side and not on the 4x2. '98-11 are all rack and pinion and older have a steering box, but if you're going full hydro like I would expect that wouldn't matter...
Thanks, that was helpful 👍

I have my eyes on a 1990 right now, I think they are the best looking

I’m working nights this weekend, maybe it will still be around in a few days
 

scotts90ranger

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
8,030
Reaction score
4,367
Points
113
Location
Dayton Oregon
Vehicle Year
1990, 1997
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Engine Size
2.3 Turbo
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6
Tire Size
35"
ok, you have my attention... my favorite is the '89-92 but I've had one for almost 23 years so I might be a bit biased... dash is sleek and compact (I have a '97 Ranger, '98 and '00 Explorer so I know the newer dash is bigger...), front end looks better (opinion, I know most prefer the first gen...), no frills and clean lines... I kinda wanted a '92 extended cab 4 cylinder for a daily driver but they're getting old (although not rusty here in Oregon which you know...) and I kinda wanted the extra HP and OBD II of a newer one, plus the '97 I found was cheap, plus it has dual piston calipers up front and was low miles and never even had a hitch ball in the bumper so a spring chicken!
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top