• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

gearing for 39.5s


hummer_maxxer

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Transmission
Automatic
hey i was just wondering what kinde of gearing i would use with a stock 2.9l and locked front and rear 44 and 9". or is it just too much for the motor and tranny??
 


mkpecor

New Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
41
Location
black diamond W.A.
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
ranger 4x4
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
um,put a 302 you will be better off, that is alot of waight, my budy had 38"s on his 87 ranger and he went back to 35s
 

Sunk

New Member
Supporting Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
6,657
Reaction score
125
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Everett, WA
Vehicle Year
2012
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.5 Eco
Transmission
Automatic
You would well into the 5.xx range, or, more likely, the 6.xx range. I don't know what ratios are made for those axles, but I believe I've seen 6.20 for the 9".

As previously stated, I would go with a V8.
 

LittleBigFoot

New Member
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
1,651
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Denver Colorado
Vehicle Year
79-00
Make / Model
Mostly Ford.
Engine Size
Building a 408w
Transmission
Automatic
Randy's Ring and Pinion has a 6.50:1 ring and pinion set for the 9". Deepest I've seen for the D44 is 5.89
Holy crap.


I'd suggest 5.13s, 37s, and a doubler for the trails
 

Evan

New Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
1,373
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
Stevens Point, WI
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Manual
hey i was just wondering what kinde of gearing i would use with a stock 2.9l and locked front and rear 44 and 9". or is it just too much for the motor and tranny??

You would want the lowest gearing possible. If you have a 2.9L with an A4LD or FM146 you'd probably blow the tranny pretty quick. If you have a 2.9L with an M5OD, you'd be ok but a little underpowered.

The easiest and maybe cheapest option would be to do a 4.0 swap and run an M5OD, and the lowest gears possible in the axles. That would give you a reliable setup with good power.

The best option would be to run a 302 mated to an NP435 or C4, and low axle gears. This would cost some $$$ potentially and involve some fab work.

Be warned: 39.5s will tax a Dana 44 pretty heavily. You'd probably be better off in the long run with a 60.
 

hummer_maxxer

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
34
Transmission
Automatic
ok, thanks, i plan on doing a 302 swamp but thats next year. and also il be running chromoly axle shafts so the 44 would be strong enough. I think il just get a set of used 35s until i put in the 302.
 

Tweeder

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
39
i'd stay the hell away from a D44 if you wanna run 39.5s, do a 35-spline 9", and 5.38 gears for a gas engine. you'll definately want a doubler if you crawl.
 

hitech_hick

New Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
41
Location
Madtown, USA
Transmission
Automatic
i'd stay the hell away from a D44 if you wanna run 39.5s, do a 35-spline 9", and 5.38 gears for a gas engine. you'll definately want a doubler if you crawl.
x2, as mentioned 40" tires and a Dana 44 = BOOM :eek:


Even with chromoly shaft, all you are doing is moving around the weakest link. Run 35's for a while, and once you have out grown them, consider a set of Dana 60's...


hick
 

Tweeder

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
39
consider a set of Dana 60's...
FWIW, a 9" owns a rear D60.....just as strong, better clearance, lighter weight. if he upgrades to a 35-spline 9" like i said (big bearing nodular 3rd, Detroit/ARB/spool, 35-spline shafts), he can run up to 44s without any issues if he drives smart.

for the front, either a D60 or, for clearance and weight, a 60-9 hybrid (9" centersection with D60 knuckles and outers.)
 

RWARanger

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2007
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
38
Location
Fitchburg,MA
Vehicle Year
1993 & 1997
Make / Model
FORD
Transmission
Manual
maybe if your rich you'd run those axles. almost all the axles you mentioned are well out of the normal persons price range. and why would you spend $3000+ on a 35 spline 9" to have to "drive smart" with it. 40"+ tires ff 14 bolt or d70. in his situation 5.38 and a bigger motor
 

Tweeder

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
39
i'm just saying that a "set" of D60s aint exactly ideal when you've already got a 9" on hand. stock 60 rear would be 30 spline vs. a 31-spline 9". 9" has a better centersection as far as gear strength, to boot. only thing you can get with a rear 60 that you'd hafta build for a 9" is a full-float setup. but you still gotta build either axle to run 40s.....chromos, gears, lockers, etc...depending on how you go, one's just as spendy as the other.

for the front, if you wanna run 40s you one only one option.......something with 60 in it. 44 just won't cut it -- even with a RATHER anemic 2.9L



as to the "driving smart" bit.....44s are getting up into the range where you NEED Rockwells to avoid axle detonation everytime you start the engine. you CAN run em with some heavily built Dana, Ford or Chebby axles, but you gotta drive smart.
 
Last edited:

hitech_hick

New Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
41
Location
Madtown, USA
Transmission
Automatic
FWIW, a 9" owns a rear D60.....just as strong, better clearance, lighter weight. if he upgrades to a 35-spline 9" like i said (big bearing nodular 3rd, Detroit/ARB/spool, 35-spline shafts), he can run up to 44s without any issues if he drives smart.

Not going to argue that point, and honestly, the Ford 9 inch (and to lesser extent the Ford 8.8) venture far further into the 1-ton strength range than most other 1/2 ton axles. The reason that I see more guys ditch 9" (or 8.9) in favor of a Dana 60 is because they are upgrading the front axle, and they want to keep the width and lug pattern the same.

for the front, either a D60 or, for clearance and weight, a 60-9 hybrid (9" centersection with D60 knuckles and outers.)
maybe if your rich you'd run those axles. almost all the axles you mentioned are well out of the normal persons price range. and why would you spend $3000+ on a 35 spline 9" to have to "drive smart" with it. 40"+ tires ff 14 bolt or d70. in his situation 5.38 and a bigger motor
Honestly I would rather run a built 9" or a built 60 than a stock 14 bolt. You have to shave the hell out of them to get any ground clearance (which is the purpose of running bigger tires) and then you are still left with a boat-anchor of an axle

i'm just saying that a "set" of D60s aint exactly ideal when you've already got a 9" on hand. stock 60 rear would be 30 spline vs. a 31-spline 9". 9" has a better centersection as far as gear strength, to boot. only thing you can get with a rear 60 that you'd hafta build for a 9" is a full-float setup. but you still gotta build either axle to run 40s.....chromos, gears, lockers, etc...depending on how you go, one's just as spendy as the other.

for the front, if you wanna run 40s you one only one option.......something with 60 in it. 44 just won't cut it -- even with a RATHER anemic 2.9L



as to the "driving smart" bit.....44s are getting up into the range where you NEED Rockwells to avoid axle detonation everytime you start the engine. you CAN run em with some heavily built Dana, Ford or Chebby axles, but you gotta drive smart.
Definitely agree with the 60 bit, no stock axle is made for this kind of abuse, even a kingpin HP D60 will need to be built up a bit even to wheel 35's. As for 44's requiring a set of rocks, depends on the terrain, driving style, and motor. I would love to see you bust a rockwell with a 2.9, not saying that it couldn't be done (think Klune + 10 to 1 Atlas), but it sure would be a sight to see.



hick
 

VaGent

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Location
Va
Vehicle Year
1990 Bronco II
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9
Transmission
Manual
I'm looking for some gears to replace my 3.73s. Where can I go to find something like 3.55s or 3.45s. I want them for my wife's BII 2X4 for highway use only. New to a lot of this stuff. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
 

Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website
Administrator
Founder / Site Owner
Supporting Vendor
Article Contributor
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
13,466
Reaction score
8,638
Points
113
Location
Nocona, Texas
Vehicle Year
1996 / 2021
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 / 2.3 Ecoboost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6-inches
Tire Size
33x12.50x15
I have a 302, 4.56's and 33's. When I rebuild my Dana 60's I'll be gearing for 40's and running 5.38's.

I used our gear calculator in the tech_library to determine that going from 33's to 40's would require me to upgrade to 5.38's from 4.56's to maintain the same performance.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top