• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Fan clutch acts up immediately after replacing radiator


wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)
The new radiator is it a larger capacity than the original? If so you will definitely experience an increase in fan engagement as your radiator is now sitting closer to the fan clutch and thus heating up that little spring in the middle of the clutch which engages the fan.
 


cbxer55

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
1,863
Reaction score
763
Points
113
Location
Midwest City, Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
Anyhow, over at LightningRodder.com, the discussion comes up frequently. It's agreed by everyone that the stock clutch fan works better than electric fans. Especially for street driven vehicles in stop-and-go traffic. It's even been agreed upon that the electric fan doesn't save anything power wise because the alternator has to pick up the slack to keep the battery charged. When the alternator is working overtime, it adds more drag to the engine.

So, Six-Of-One, Half-Dozen-Of-The-Other. Years ago, had an efan that I had put on another truck, die on me in city traffic. Just gave up the ghost and quit working. Worked fine,, til it didn't. I swore I'd never do one again. Then I got swayed into trying one on my Lightning. Got it all mounted and wired, started truck, when the fan should've come on, big bunch of smoke came out from in between the fan and motor. Big, thought the truck was going to catch fire. Don't have a fire extinguisher in my garage. Will soon. Took off efan and wires, tossed it all in the round-open-top-file. NEVER AGAIN!!!!!! Wrote off the monetary loss as a live and learn experience. NEVER BUY ANOTHER DAMN EFAN! Tried em twice, got stung twice. Once is a mistake. Twice is pure stupidity. Yup, I'm stupid, dumb as a box of rocks. For having done it a second time.

I'm not concerned with a few hp, nor a few mpg. Not worth the risk. I'll keep the clutch fans.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,292
Reaction score
8,298
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Yup, opinions vary, but there is no defensible position for mechanical fan over e-fan, just opinions :)
 

8thTon

Well-Known Member
--- Banned ---
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
806
Points
113
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
My world is filled with stuff that needs to be fixed
The only question is how large is the parasitic load of the clutch fan when it is coasting? I’ve never seen any good numbers on that. There’s an old test from 1970 where Pontiac claimed 4-5hp at 6000rpm, but my engine never goes there, it was likely a bigger fan, and it doesn’t tell you the average load for normal driving with the fan mostly coasting and airflow to help spin it. I doubt it averages 1hp, but it clearly isn’t zero like an E-fan under the same circumstances.

Balanced against that is more air flow capacity when it is on full, plus less complexity. I doubt cost is much different, and I seriously doubt you’d see any mileage change at all in normal driving.

These are the kinds of tradeoffs engineers make all the time, and I wouldn’t switch.
 

88workcar

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
194
Reaction score
48
Points
28
Location
Pierre Part La.
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ranger XL
Transmission
Manual
Actually an e-fan is better than a working or broken mechanical fan, not even an arguable point, mechanical fans are just cheaper for car makers, but more and more are switching to e-fans to get the better MPG numbers
On a year of change, Chevy did NOTHING BUT go to a E Fan, rated the engine 10-15hp more than the previous yr. It's a cost issue, $2 of savings over 2 million car/trucks is what drives the decision for the automakers.

I check every tank for MPG, on both of my vehicles. Not a one tank test, but when the one tank shows better or worse you know something changed. (weather, load, roads, driving habit ect...) Watching mpg is a hobby for me. My big truck, Ram Ecodiesel finally broke 30mpg last week, now due to driving conditions it dropped to 27.6.

I have had a E Fan on three different vehicles and all with a gain to mpg. I'm sold on them.
 

Shran

Junk Collector
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,637
Reaction score
4,704
Points
113
Location
Rapid City SD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
I've done a bunch of experimentation with the three fan clutches available - the severe duty one is indeed engaged most of the time. I thought it would be a worthwhile part for my Explorer since I wheel it a lot and if I'm out on a multi-day camping trip, I've got probably 600 pounds of extra gear... plus all the skid plates, bumpers, and other gear. I'm guessing it weighs over a thousand pounds more than it did in stock form.

Anyway the severe duty clutch sure keeps it cool but when that sucker kicks on, it's hard to maintain highway speed. I replaced it with a "heavy duty", the next step down... works great. It still gets hot if I'm idling with the AC on but never any other time and I think the clutch engages when it should.

In regards to the other argument here, e-fans vs mechanical: it all comes down to the CFM rating. An inadequate fan of any style will cause problems, but that's my one argument for using a mechanical fan... it's kinda hard to find electric fans with high flow numbers for certain applications.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,292
Reaction score
8,298
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Yes, specific use fans need to be researched a bit

Mechanical fans don't generate their max air flow until engine is above 2,000rpm, which is why you can get a bit of a temp rise just after stopping after running engine hard, double whammy of the slower water pump and mechanical fan speeds

CFM air flow for e-fans can be researched and you can get what you need, for most an e-fan from wrecking yard works fine

For off-roading and especially for water crossings, the e-fan setup can be equipped with an OFF ON manual switch, which can keep engine bay dry if water gets up to fan level


Found this article, not about e-fans, lol, just tests on different mechanical fans and CFM: http://carnut.com/ramblin/dyno.html

So about 1,500 CFM at idle(800rpm), and 2,100 CFM at 1,600rpm with mechanical fan

Also interesting bit about alternator HP draw with an electrical load, I though it would be more, 1.25HP
 
Last edited:

8thTon

Well-Known Member
--- Banned ---
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
806
Points
113
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
My world is filled with stuff that needs to be fixed
On a year of change, Chevy did NOTHING BUT go to a E Fan, rated the engine 10-15hp more than the previous yr. It's a cost issue, $2 of savings over 2 million car/trucks is what drives the decision for the automakers.

I check every tank for MPG, on both of my vehicles. Not a one tank test, but when the one tank shows better or worse you know something changed. (weather, load, roads, driving habit ect...) Watching mpg is a hobby for me. My big truck, Ram Ecodiesel finally broke 30mpg last week, now due to driving conditions it dropped to 27.6.

I have had a E Fan on three different vehicles and all with a gain to mpg. I'm sold on them.
Nonetheless you stated upthread that your original fan was loud and the clutch was broken, so the mileage improvement you got does not represent the improvement over a properly functioning stock clutch fan. I'd still like to see some actual data on that, but have not been able to find much. I have no doubt the manufacturers know what it is.

I've done a bunch of experimentation with the three fan clutches available - the severe duty one is indeed engaged most of the time. I thought it would be a worthwhile part for my Explorer since I wheel it a lot and if I'm out on a multi-day camping trip, I've got probably 600 pounds of extra gear... plus all the skid plates, bumpers, and other gear. I'm guessing it weighs over a thousand pounds more than it did in stock form.

Anyway the severe duty clutch sure keeps it cool but when that sucker kicks on, it's hard to maintain highway speed. I replaced it with a "heavy duty", the next step down... works great. It still gets hot if I'm idling with the AC on but never any other time and I think the clutch engages when it should.

In regards to the other argument here, e-fans vs mechanical: it all comes down to the CFM rating. An inadequate fan of any style will cause problems, but that's my one argument for using a mechanical fan... it's kinda hard to find electric fans with high flow numbers for certain applications.
Most E-fans operate on a 30A fuse. Even at a full 30A that's barely 1/2hp, so this is all that is available to drive the E-fan. The load on the alternator to generate this will need to be quite a bit more than that due to losses. It does get some CFM improvement from closer clearances to the shroud, but the mechanical drive of the clutch fan has as no real drive power limit. Both the operating temperature and the fan rpm can be set by the fan clutch to make use of that
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,292
Reaction score
8,298
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
"clutch fan has as no real drive power limit", yes and thats the problem, lol

Read that article above

Idle and slower speeds is when fan is used/needed that's the CFM number needed, doesn't matter if mechanical fan can generate 6,000cfm at 3,500rpm, just sucks HP away radiator doesn't need it and can't even use it

If e-fan can generate 2,000cfm at .3-.5hp then thats all you need
 

8thTon

Well-Known Member
--- Banned ---
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
806
Points
113
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
My world is filled with stuff that needs to be fixed
"clutch fan has as no real drive power limit", yes and thats the problem, lol

Read that article above

Idle and slower speeds is when fan is used/needed that's the CFM number needed, doesn't matter if mechanical fan can generate 6,000cfm at 3,500rpm, just sucks HP away radiator doesn't need it and can't even use it

If e-fan can generate 2,000cfm at .3-.5hp then thats all you need
The fan, radiator and clutch will be designed as a system, not just a bunch of random parts bolted together. The fan speed is dependent on whether the clutch in engaged or not plus the rpm of the engine, but regardless the fan won't spin faster than some max rpm determined by the viscous coupling, so hp loss tops out there. The hp loss does not keep rising with rpm.

The max cfm at idle will be determined by the fan design - I think it's a fair assumption that the engineers have used a fan that can cool the engine at max heat load at idle, regardless of what kind of fan they used. If the rpm is up with normal loading and there is airflow through the radiator the clutch will not be engaged and the fan will bee coasting with minimal hp loss. That is the typical operating condition in normal driving, and represents the power loss the clutch fan will use - just like an E-fan, most of the time it's doing (almost) nothing.

That's the kind of info I'd like to see, but it's going to vary a lot based on expected heat loss for an engine. A big block is going to generate a lot more waste heat and going to have a fan that can produce a lot more cfm, and use a lot more power to do it. It will also have higher loss when coasting. From the article they were not able to get the big block fan to disengage properly, but even if they had it would have different loss and cfm numbers than a Ranger fan.

"One other note....the themo-clutch was difficult to get to perform consistently with what we set up. We would heat it up and everything was fine then all of a sudden it would lock up under high rpms. We never could get it to stop all the way....even after putting it in the refrig over night. The results posted here took the most time to get the consistent 4 pulls and all of the results were averaged anywho! I would suggest that it would work more consistently in a car with a larger heat source etal. "
 

fred m

Active Member
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
92
Reaction score
89
Points
33
Location
Tallahassee, Florida
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
12.5 cups
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Just an update, the fan clutch started acting completely normal. I drove it over 1,000 miles in the last couple days, and have not heard any excessive fan noise. My fuel economy has returned to normal, as well.

There is no problem worse than an intermittent one. As of right now, this fan clutch shows no signs of being bad, so I'll just let it be. If it starts locking up excessively again I will replace it with a Motorcraft standard duty clutch.
 

8thTon

Well-Known Member
--- Banned ---
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
806
Points
113
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
My world is filled with stuff that needs to be fixed
Just an update, the fan clutch started acting completely normal. I drove it over 1,000 miles in the last couple days, and have not heard any excessive fan noise. My fuel economy has returned to normal, as well.

There is no problem worse than an intermittent one. As of right now, this fan clutch shows no signs of being bad, so I'll just let it be. If it starts locking up excessively again I will replace it with a Motorcraft standard duty clutch.
Maybe something fell into the fan/clutch assembly while you were working that locked it up, and has now been ejected?
 

fred m

Active Member
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
92
Reaction score
89
Points
33
Location
Tallahassee, Florida
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
12.5 cups
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Maybe something fell into the fan/clutch assembly while you were working that locked it up, and has now been ejected?
Perhaps. I did not lose any tools or anything, but any number of things could have happened
 

wildbill23c

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ham Radio Operator
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
3,917
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Southwestern Idaho
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
0
Total Drop
0
Tire Size
215/70-R14
My credo
19K, 19D, 92Y, 88M, 91F....OIF-III (2004-2005)
Sounds kind of odd that it just suddenly went silent. Is the fan still spinning when the engine is idling?
 

88workcar

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
194
Reaction score
48
Points
28
Location
Pierre Part La.
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ranger XL
Transmission
Manual
The fan, radiator and clutch will be designed as a system, not just a bunch of random parts bolted together. The fan speed is dependent on whether the clutch in engaged or not plus the rpm of the engine, but regardless the fan won't spin faster than some max rpm determined by the viscous coupling, so hp loss tops out there. The hp loss does not keep rising with rpm.

The max cfm at idle will be determined by the fan design - I think it's a fair assumption that the engineers have used a fan that can cool the engine at max heat load at idle, regardless of what kind of fan they used. If the rpm is up with normal loading and there is airflow through the radiator the clutch will not be engaged and the fan will bee coasting with minimal hp loss. That is the typical operating condition in normal driving, and represents the power loss the clutch fan will use - just like an E-fan, most of the time it's doing (almost) nothing.

That's the kind of info I'd like to see, but it's going to vary a lot based on expected heat loss for an engine. A big block is going to generate a lot more waste heat and going to have a fan that can produce a lot more cfm, and use a lot more power to do it. It will also have higher loss when coasting. From the article they were not able to get the big block fan to disengage properly, but even if they had it would have different loss and cfm numbers than a Ranger fan.

"One other note....the themo-clutch was difficult to get to perform consistently with what we set up. We would heat it up and everything was fine then all of a sudden it would lock up under high rpms. We never could get it to stop all the way....even after putting it in the refrig over night. The results posted here took the most time to get the consistent 4 pulls and all of the results were averaged anywho! I would suggest that it would work more consistently in a car with a larger heat source etal. "
I am an open eye kind of man, you have presented a case good enough for me to try a new clutch on the old set up.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top