corerftech
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2021
- Messages
- 245
- Reaction score
- 98
- Location
- Memphis, TN
- Vehicle Year
- 1987
- Make / Model
- Ford Ranger
- Transmission
- Automatic
Good morning folks.
My Explorer 5.0, 2001 ripped nicely in the driveway yesterday at its first carbureted/HEI fire up and tune.
Later today, God willing, I may actually power the TCU and attempt a brief driveway test of the trans control.
So all has gone swimmingly as expected, I spend what is probably 100 hours contemplating the Explorer electrical manual and all interactions of devices.
No unwanted idiot lights, except the "THEFT" light. Now as I read, the theft light is an LED and as such is having its input go high to light it.
It has two paths for getting voltage.
1: PATS module
2: RAP module.
Now I would like it to continue to operate based on RAP moudule input.
PATS is gone since there is no PCM to dialogue with from PATS module.
I would rather not simply reach in and cut SAID wire from PATS. I would prefer to delete PATS completely from the dash.
Caveat: I would rather NOT remove the I/P at all!!!!! I hate small spaces, big catchers mit sized hands.
Has anyone seen the PATS module and if I just remove the I/P, does it appear that I should be able to rather easily unplug the module to defeat the THEFT LED input?
Oh hell--- I remembered just now that I have a couple of backlight lamps out and need to remove the I/P to replace them. Dang it.
Anyway, Buehler, Buehler? Anyone seen or touched a PATS in late model Exp to know how much blood I will lose on the access?
Lastly, I have not spent much time behind the I/P, had it out once for some reason if I recall but was not paying attantion to this detail. I need to install a manual choke cable for the carburetor. I need to drill the firewall and if the I/P is coming out, then that is an ideal time and place to penetrate the wall. I think?????
Does anyone have a good visual memory if the firewall can be seen from the driver seat with I/P out? I can also punch through near the throttle cable penetration and that was my goto, but I would rather it be even higher on the firewall if possible so the I/P backside is appealing.
Thanks in advance for any memory sharing.
Mike
My Explorer 5.0, 2001 ripped nicely in the driveway yesterday at its first carbureted/HEI fire up and tune.
Later today, God willing, I may actually power the TCU and attempt a brief driveway test of the trans control.
So all has gone swimmingly as expected, I spend what is probably 100 hours contemplating the Explorer electrical manual and all interactions of devices.
No unwanted idiot lights, except the "THEFT" light. Now as I read, the theft light is an LED and as such is having its input go high to light it.
It has two paths for getting voltage.
1: PATS module
2: RAP module.
Now I would like it to continue to operate based on RAP moudule input.
PATS is gone since there is no PCM to dialogue with from PATS module.
I would rather not simply reach in and cut SAID wire from PATS. I would prefer to delete PATS completely from the dash.
Caveat: I would rather NOT remove the I/P at all!!!!! I hate small spaces, big catchers mit sized hands.
Has anyone seen the PATS module and if I just remove the I/P, does it appear that I should be able to rather easily unplug the module to defeat the THEFT LED input?
Oh hell--- I remembered just now that I have a couple of backlight lamps out and need to remove the I/P to replace them. Dang it.
Anyway, Buehler, Buehler? Anyone seen or touched a PATS in late model Exp to know how much blood I will lose on the access?
Lastly, I have not spent much time behind the I/P, had it out once for some reason if I recall but was not paying attantion to this detail. I need to install a manual choke cable for the carburetor. I need to drill the firewall and if the I/P is coming out, then that is an ideal time and place to penetrate the wall. I think?????
Does anyone have a good visual memory if the firewall can be seen from the driver seat with I/P out? I can also punch through near the throttle cable penetration and that was my goto, but I would rather it be even higher on the firewall if possible so the I/P backside is appealing.
Thanks in advance for any memory sharing.
Mike