• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

CA Mandates all trucks must be electric beginning in 2024


cbxer55

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2009
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
767
Points
113
Location
Midwest City, Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Automatic
Maybe more windmill farms will be filling the skyline of California in the future
Maybe more cows will have fart bags on their ass as well. Catch that methane and use it to power electric generation. LMAO!!
 


RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,370
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Yes, energy storage is the current issue, liquid fuels are better for energy storage than batteries
I don't think that will ever change, batteries will get better, but will never catch liquid fuels in energy potential and weight
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,016
Reaction score
2,832
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
No i just figured since an average tractor is 30 now add another 20 on top of that.

Seeing as how an average tesla sedan is like 2 k heavier then a similar gas. (6k vs 4k), and then add more for more range.
I couldn't quickly find anything resembling official numbers for the battery packs, but there were some credible guesses in the 12-15k pound weight range. Given the reduction in weight of the powerplant itself, a lot of that is offset. Looked like closer to a 4-5 thousand pound difference in total capacity.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,394
Reaction score
7,486
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
I couldn't quickly find anything resembling official numbers for the battery packs, but there were some credible guesses in the 12-15k pound weight range. Given the reduction in weight of the powerplant itself, a lot of that is offset. Looked like closer to a 4-5 thousand pound difference in total capacity.
You know how heavy an electric motor would be to replace a diesel?

Thats alot of whinding....
 

fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,016
Reaction score
2,832
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,394
Reaction score
7,486
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
No. But i cant imagine it being significantly lighter then a diesel.

Dry the ISX 15 is aroud 3000lbs.

Cant find the weight of a big electric motor.

I suppose you could take the trans out of the equation....but still...i dont see it saving much, if any weight.
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,370
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
There would be 3 electric motors on a semi tractor
One for each axle, yes front axle as well, so AWD
There may be a way to "free wheel" 2 of the axles if there was no trailer attached, it didn't save much on MPG for our Rangers with unlocked front hubs

I don't think the "in the wheel" motors would work for this application, maybe some day

But yes the battery pack weight to run these would be way more than the weight of diesel engine and transmission

If doing a hybrid diesel/electric, no batteries, it would add more weight but I don't think it would be that much more and MPG would be much better
Like highway MPG but in city driving since RPM is steady
 
Last edited:

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,394
Reaction score
7,486
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
There would be 3 electric motors on a semi tractor
One for each axle, yes front axle as well, so AWD
There may be a way to "free wheel" 2 of the axles if there was no trailer attached, it didn't save much on MPG for our Rangers with unlocked front hubs

I don't think the "in the wheel" motors would work for this application, maybe some day

But yes the battery pack weight to run these would be way more than the weight of diesel engine and transmission

If doing a hybrid diesel/electric, no batteries, it would add more weight but I don't think it would be that much more and MPG would be much better
AWD would be nice....

But i really wouldnt wanna give up my diesel
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,335
Reaction score
17,817
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I couldn't quickly find anything resembling official numbers for the battery packs, but there were some credible guesses in the 12-15k pound weight range. Given the reduction in weight of the powerplant itself, a lot of that is offset. Looked like closer to a 4-5 thousand pound difference in total capacity.
Really depends on how it is built.

Are they sticking a big motor in nose? 4 or 6 hub motors? Something in between? And you have to route significant cables to feed whatever you do.

You know how heavy an electric motor would be to replace a diesel?

Thats alot of whinding....
Transmission optional...

No idea how it would compare/hold up but here is a 300hp electric motor that weighs a touch under 3000lbs. A little soft on hp but electric doesn't play fair with torque either. Probably not the most cutting edge motor out there for such a thing either.

 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,394
Reaction score
7,486
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
300hp? Thats cute. This ISX is 500.

I know the thing about electric torque...blah blah blah but i still bet this ol cummins in low would give it a fight assuming traction was equal.

But you gotta think too...thats 3000lbs just in motor...add in batteries too...theres no way around the fact an electric truck is going to be much heavier then a diesel, anf really, less practical.
 

stmitch

March 2011 STOTM Winner
MTOTM Winner
2011 Truck of The Year
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
2,283
Reaction score
646
Points
113
Location
Central Indiana
Vehicle Year
2000
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
You subtract the weight of the diesel engine, trans, differentials and fuel tanks and replace them with batteries and motors (either one per axle or one per wheel). I suppose frames could be redesigned to acommodate twisting in the opposite direction rather than longitudinally and that could alter the weight of the chassis some too but that would take some FEA software.

This Tesla Semi was pictured while testing, with the driver claiming around 75k gross:


That's 9 ecology blocks by my count which weigh about 4k each. A 49ft flatbed (presumably steel) is around 13k.
So 75k weight - 36k load - 13k trailer = 26k for the cab as a SWAG. I don't see a sleeper on that so I'm guessing that's a day cab?

Google tells me that an average diesel day cab weighs about 16k. More like 20k for sleeper trucks. Plus fuel, driver, etc. So if those numbers are accurate, the electrical stuff probably adds 5-10k in weight over a diesel powertrain.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,335
Reaction score
17,817
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
300hp? Thats cute. This ISX is 500.

I know the thing about electric torque...blah blah blah but i still bet this ol cummins in low would give it a fight assuming traction was equal.

But you gotta think too...thats 3000lbs just in motor...add in batteries too...theres no way around the fact an electric truck is going to be much heavier then a diesel, anf really, less practical.
It is a caveman crude industrial motor that is made to be bolted on the floor too. I am sure they could save weight if weight mattered... and they don't need a transmission.

They make them with more power but rarely list the weight, 300hp was getting in the ballpark.

But yeah, I think an electric truck is probably going to be heavier than a diesel.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
California isn't flat, either. That's one of the issues. It is a little different proposition going over the mountains with electric, than diesel. If they really did try to get rid of all diesel OTR trucks, it will spawn a huge amount of truck stops at the state border, greatly increase train freight traffic (thus slowing down delivery), and possibly impact port traffic from overseas.

The railroads could electrify a LOT easier than the trucking industry, at least so they could get freight over the border into neighboring states.

Oh and don't forget the additional wear and tear on the roads. More trucks, and heavier, to move the same amount of weight.
 

MikeG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,353
Reaction score
752
Points
113
Location
central Texas
Vehicle Year
1997
Make / Model
B4000
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
2"
Tire Size
235/75r15
I can see it now - when the truck runs out of juice, hoist sails if the wind is favorable..... LOL.....
 

RonD

Official TRS AI
TRS Technical Advisor
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,370
Points
113
Location
canada
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
Well if the batteries were recharged with wind power it would be the same thing :)

And you could always carry a portable generator, lol
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top