mtnrgr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2007
- Messages
- 550
- Reaction score
- 740
- Points
- 93
- Location
- California
- Vehicle Year
- 1994
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Size
- 3.0
- Transmission
- Manual
- 2WD / 4WD
- 2WD
- Total Lift
- 6" Skyjacker, with 1.5" coil spacers, custom radius arms, custom traction bars
- Tire Size
- 31x10.50
- My credo
- Lord God is my guardian
I am rethinking of getting a 5spd in my next ranger. With the soreness I have in both shoulders, considered getting a auto instead...wanna stay with a 3.0. Still looking at 93-97 rangers. I have seen quite a few 3.0 rangers of those years with autos as I have looked in my area. This will be for m daily driver, and keep my 94 3.0 5spd for weekend drives etc. I drove a 3.0 auto a few times in the past and it was sorta gutless, but doable.
I am aware that the 93-94 autos were ok, yet junk...not sure about 95-97. Can someone define if autos from those years are bad or good?
Any assistance is appreciated.
I am aware that the 93-94 autos were ok, yet junk...not sure about 95-97. Can someone define if autos from those years are bad or good?
Any assistance is appreciated.