• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

98 Ford Ranger Tire Size Question


El Beto

New Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Brownsville texas
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford ranger
Transmission
Manual
I got - '98 Ranger XLT 2WD, Manual.
And I need help on knowing how many inches should it lift to put on some 32x10r14
 

Attachments



sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,807
Reaction score
12,562
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
I got - '98 Ranger XLT 2WD, Manual.
And I need help on knowing how many inches should it lift to put on some 32x10r14
Assuming there are no axle blocks or lift of any kind in it now, about 2 inches as a minimum. Look at the back axle. If the springs are mounted directly to the axle, you have no lift.

If there are axle blocks back there, you will need to measure them and go from there.

The other option is a body lift where the rubber mounts are replaced with thicker ones to lift the body. If the kit dosen't include them, you will need relocation brackets for the bumpers to close the gap between the body and the bumper.
 

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,368
Reaction score
2,955
Points
113
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
check your front brakes, 14" wheels do not fit over 11.25 rotor systems.
if you have the smaller 10" rotors with 32"tires you basically won't have any brakes.
 

Manscout

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Messages
75
Reaction score
122
Points
33
Location
Gillette, Wy
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5
Tire Size
33x12.5x15
The easy answer is "YES!" I run the exact same Wulf lift kit on my '98 and have no issues with 33" Milestar Patagonias. My truck is also a 3.73 LSD. I don't run sway bars, so i get lots of articulation and never rub. I also drive 75mph on the interstate with no issues and get 18-22mpg regularly.
 

Lefty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
1,669
Reaction score
1,837
Points
113
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
Ranger Edge
Transmission
Automatic
Dudes,

I just bought the WULF 2.5" Front 2" Rear lift kit. I ordered 31x10.5 tires and 15x8 wheels. I'm thinking 31" is weak shiiii, and about going up to 33". Can I run this? If I can what else do I need to make it work or should I just stick with the 31s?

What I got - '98 Ranger XLT 2WD, Manual.
sharp looking truck.
 

Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
13,942
Reaction score
13,429
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
The easy answer is "YES!" I run the exact same Wulf lift kit on my '98 and have no issues with 33" Milestar Patagonias. My truck is also a 3.73 LSD. I don't run sway bars, so i get lots of articulation and never rub. I also drive 75mph on the interstate with no issues and get 18-22mpg regularly.
So you did this on a 2wd coil spring truck?
 

Manscout

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Messages
75
Reaction score
122
Points
33
Location
Gillette, Wy
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5
Tire Size
33x12.5x15
Nope. I guess it is not the "exact same", but assuming the fitment is similar, there should not be an issue.
 

Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
13,942
Reaction score
13,429
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
Nope. I guess it is not the "exact same", but assuming the fitment is similar, there should not be an issue.
Well factory ride height is different between the two... so the same amount of lift will still leave the 2wd short... IMHO.

Not saying it won't work... but its not an apples to apples comparison.

I'm probably more interested in how you achieve 22 mpg.
 

Manscout

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2023
Messages
75
Reaction score
122
Points
33
Location
Gillette, Wy
Vehicle Year
1998
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5
Tire Size
33x12.5x15
I'm probably more interested in how you achieve 22 mpg.
I'm pretty astonished myself. The best I achieved was a round trip from Gillette,Wyoming to Lewiston, Idaho. This contains a crazy amount of elevation change, but I was running the same setup and tires I have now; minus the supercharger. My best guess is the tire design. When you run Patagonias at 35PSI (highway), they primarily ride on the center tread block. You air them down to gain traction off-road. I'm guessing there is less rolling resistance when fully aired up.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top