• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

4x4 U-Joints and Axles : Wear Inspection and Replacement


eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
I hadn’t heard of u joints with bushings.
Currently these are all for my 4x4 stuff. Maybe when i do my rear driveshaft I’ll get some fancy u joints instead of needle ones, since the rear shaft is what i use 95% of the time.
 


lil_Blue_Ford

Cut & Weld
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
9,178
Reaction score
7,664
Location
Butler, PA, USSA
Vehicle Year
00
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0l
Transmission
Automatic
Total Drop
4”
I hadn’t heard of u joints with bushings.
Currently these are all for my 4x4 stuff. Maybe when i do my rear driveshaft I’ll get some fancy u joints instead of needle ones, since the rear shaft is what i use 95% of the time.
They are out there, but be prepared with a thick wallet, the cheapest I’ve see are over $100 per joint… the better ones are a couple hundred each…

I thought about some RCV axle shafts for the D-44 TTB in my F-150 until I saw a pricetag of around $1,000. Unfortunately, I just don’t have that level of cash to throw at things right now…
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,794
Reaction score
4,802
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
You‘re talking about driving the actual yoke ear to slightly widen the span of the two ears? I wasn’t thinking it would be that easy to move those things.
Or do you mean use the punch to tap the cup so that the cup drives slightly back ”out” a bit?
I meant to tap on the ears to spread the yoke a little, it won't take much so go easy.
 

eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Well, instead of attempting to bend things that may not need to be bent, i did another test.
I installed the same new u joint on another yoke, and used the larger C clips.
I had precisely the same outcome. I didn’t measure anything, but I remember the amount of extra force required the get it in, and then also the amount of tightness which was virtually frozen.

I then uninstalled and reinstalled with two old thinner clips and it turns out perfectly. Everything is snug, and it spins very smoothly and freely.
The next test will be to install a second identical model U joint on that previous yoke that also had this issue yesterday.

I think that if i again have the exact same results, then all evidence points to the fact that these clips are just too thick to work with these axle shafts from 1989, for whatever reason.

I would further consider the idea that the yokes need to be bent apart a bit if it was just one of them and if they varied a bit. But so far they have the exact same amount of tightness and visually they appear to have the same clip thickness needed.

As for the idea of the banging the installed yoke/joint so that it settles into place.. I honestly don’t see how that could work since the THICKER problematic clips are just sitting fully flush on the inside of each yoke ear. They have absolutely nowhere to move inward or outward to allow the u joint or the caps to settle anyway different.

I did bang with a rubber mallet the finished joint/yoke that i just did with the smaller clips, and it did seem to make a little bit of difference in joint mobility. Seemed like it was already pretty good but then it got even smoother. I DO think that’s what y’all are referring to here in this process, haha. I DON’T think you’re referring to a u joint that is so siezed that you almost need a hammer to move it at all, and then this u joint being free’d up just by tapping on the yoke a bunch. I’m pretty convinced that i need the thinner clips. I only have three old thin ones that are salvageable, so i have to put a pause in this process and either go buy a bunch of thinner clips or go right ahead and start grinding down the new ones.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Wallows in rivers
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
33,494
Reaction score
20,800
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
Hence all the aftermarket high-strength joints that use bushings instead of needle bearings…

Not entirely sure why those are so expensive and why most U-joints haven’t gone to bushings…
Probably not as durable long term.
 

eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Ok so here’s a new u joint, different than the first.
And here’s now a third yoke I’m testing. This one is the slip yoke by front diff.
Again the same exact result.. I can just barely get the thicker clips in, and when I do, the u joint is nearly seized and almost requires a tool to rotate.
Also i took some pics of what the outside of caps look like. Note how much the caps need to be pressed in to make the thicker clips work.
They‘re not even, but I’m guessing the total extra distance is about equal to the thickness difference of the clips. It’s pretty significant, probably about 1/16” in total.


IMG_5262.jpeg


IMG_5263.jpeg
 

Jazzer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
697
Reaction score
583
Location
Indianapolis
Vehicle Year
2007
Make / Model
Ranger
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
I got some unjoints once with the same clip problem-too thick. I ground them down on a belt sander.
You are correct that binding the ujoints to use the thicker clips is a bad idea.
Maybe NAPA has the correct clips?
 

eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
I got some unjoints once with the same clip problem-too thick. I ground them down on a belt sander.
You are correct that binding the ujoints to use the thicker clips is a bad idea.
Maybe NAPA has the correct clips?
Good to know, thanks. It’s been a weird detour that’s been challenging my learning haha.
I finally put calipers up to the old and new clips..
Old OEM: 1.5mm
New w/Moog u-joints: 2mm
 

85_Ranger4x4

Wallows in rivers
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
33,494
Reaction score
20,800
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I got some unjoints once with the same clip problem-too thick. I ground them down on a belt sander.
You are correct that binding the ujoints to use the thicker clips is a bad idea.
Maybe NAPA has the correct clips?
For the front axle it isn't Spicer it is an off brand IMO. There is nothing in between.
 
Last edited:

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
24,683
Reaction score
6,048
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
could be wrong clips. this assumes you cleaned the seats.

they should have came with more then one set of clips. certain toyotas take really thick clips with that size joint in the rear driveshaft application...some even have a flat zerk in each cap.


bushings wont last on a daily. i run them on the stub axle sometimes but are too soft for ujoints on the hiway. not sure what is out there now, some dont use any bushings and the cap is the wear part. just re cap when they get slop.

and rcv for ttb are much more then 1k now. ....hell its 1400 for eb axles.

even those tulip seal cups are not daily friendly....so the rcv require you to pay attention to them for tlc. learned this with plow trucks. supposed to be better now.

pretty simple. measure what they are. then you will know what you need.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
24,683
Reaction score
6,048
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
i have to buy two joints for certain spots on my rig to make what it needs. but thats how it was built with the parts i had at the time.
 

eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Well, i suppose each joint may end up a case by case scenario and I’ll have to decide this for each.

I did figure out that Dana Spicer 2-7-29 (outer style) and Dana Spicer 2-7-99 (inner style) are the “thinner” dimension, about .060” / 1.5mm. So i think there’s something to be said for that.

What sucks is that i went and dug up some more of the OEM rings that had flown off onto the floor in garage, and found that some of them were thick like the new ones. And i didn’t keep track, not having a clue that they were of much importance to measure. Half of them busted apart too.

So I’ve got to just take this one joint at a time, and have enough on hand of both sizes.

Apparently it’ll be pretty obvious when the clips are too thick… the joint won’t move. But what if i mistakingly use a too thin clip? The joint will work smoothly, but there might be too much invisible play in there. The rubber will pretty much hold it in the right place, but the play will still be significant and could cause very bad things to happen.

Anyone have any tips on making sure I don’t install a too-small set of clips on one joint?

I guess the fail proof method is to install the thick ones first, and if they cause the joint to seize, install thin ones.
 

Curious Hound

Formerly EricBphoto
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
16,725
Reaction score
19,305
Age
60
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Having them too small won't hurt anything. They're just a little bit weaker.

Honestly, I still think the thick ones should work. But, after getting them installed, either thick or thin, you need to make sure the caps are properly seated against the clips. When I replaced my front axle shaft u-joints a few weeks ago, I had binding because I accidentally pushed the caps too far in so I could get the clips on. Just had to push them back out against the clips.
 

eightynine4x4

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2020
Messages
765
Reaction score
206
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
2.5" Suspension
Tire Size
31 x 10.5 x 15
Having them too small won't hurt anything. They're just a little bit weaker.

Honestly, I still think the thick ones should work. But, after getting them installed, either thick or thin, you need to make sure the caps are properly seated against the clips. When I replaced my front axle shaft u-joints a few weeks ago, I had binding because I accidentally pushed the caps too far in so I could get the clips on. Just had to push them back out against the clips.
Curious Hound !! Great new name !!
Ok I understand about possibly having pushed them in too far to get the clips in, but backing things out seems to be pretty tricky. One problem is that you really don’t know anything is too stiff until both sides are installed. And once both sides are installed, neither side is easy to back out some.

So you’d be sitting there with a flat head and a hammer tapping around the perimeter of the cap in hopes that it is pushing it back in some, while not damaging the rubber ring. And then flipping it over and doing the other side, then testing to see if it’s loosened at all?
 

Curious Hound

Formerly EricBphoto
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
TRS 25th Anniversary
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
16,725
Reaction score
19,305
Age
60
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Curious Hound !! Great new name !!
Ok I understand about possibly having pushed them in too far to get the clips in, but backing things out seems to be pretty tricky. One problem is that you really don’t know anything is too stiff until both sides are installed. And once both sides are installed, neither side is easy to back out some.

So you’d be sitting there with a flat head and a hammer tapping around the perimeter of the cap in hopes that it is pushing it back in some, while not damaging the rubber ring. And then flipping it over and doing the other side, then testing to see if it’s loosened at all?
No I do it like in the video I posted earlier.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Today's birthdays

TRS Events

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Rick W
October Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

25th Anniversary Merch

Follow TRS On Instagram

25th Anniversary Sponsors

TRS-3 Ford Ranger Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top