• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

351w heads on a 302


Logan95

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Location
Dunnellon Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
2003
Make / Model
Ford
Ford
Transmission
Manual
I’ve been searching for cheap heads for a little while for my 302 as I bought it with no heads.

It’s a 5.0 from an 89 f150

I stopped to visit my uncles yesterday and my cousin gave me the heads off his 2.5 ton bronco with a built 351w as he recently went with a set of AFRs

Now I’ve searched and searched, some say nothing has to be changed some say some things have to be changed. I’ve seen you can run a 302 intake, some say you HAVE to run a 351 intake.

The 302 is bored .030 over with flat top pistons, .498/.498 cam

Any of y’all have any knowledge on this? What head gasket to use? Intake? Compression issues? Headers?
 


alpine67

Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
38
Reaction score
4
Points
8
Location
Raleigh NC
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
As I recall the head bolt size is different, can't remember which way, but there are head bolts made just for this swap. Otherwise they bolt right on (I think). I was going to do this very thing back in the 80's and still have the good 1970 heads somewhere in the shop and probably the bolts, as well as pushrod guide plates for screw in rocker studs . I'm sure someone will chime in if I'm wrong about needed changes to make them work!
 

Logan95

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Location
Dunnellon Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
2003
Make / Model
Ford
Ford
Transmission
Manual
As I recall the head bolt size is different, can't remember which way, but there are head bolts made just for this swap. Otherwise they bolt right on (I think). I was going to do this very thing back in the 80's and still have the good 1970 heads somewhere in the shop and probably the bolts, as well as pushrod guide plates for screw in rocker studs . I'm sure someone will chime in if I'm wrong about needed changes to make them work!
Yes the 351 heads take a 1/2” bolt as the 302 takes a 7/16” bolt

And I could be wrong but judging by the casting number on the heads (I could’ve decoded it wrong) they’re from a 75 truck? EB-D5TE? The heads are also complete
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
You will lose compression as the 351 has a larger combustion chamber, the head bolts for the 351 are larger, 1/2 vs 7/16 for the 302 (as you know) which can cause issues with the heads shifting, making them prone to blowing head gaskets.

The big idea with doing it for "performance" was that the 351 had bigger intake valves and so it could flow better, the problem is that with the mistmatched cylinder and intake port/valve you end up lowering intake velocity, and reducing overall performance.

It will work if you need heads cheap to free to get the engine running, but it is a less than ideal setup, and it may cause you issues.

As for the intake, I would think you'd need the 302 intake. The 302 and 351 intakes are different widths because the blocks are different widths, (taller block at the same angle makes a wider top of the V) and the intake width should be determined by block height and angle.
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,412
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
They'll bolt on with the right bolts but you don't want them. Mid 70's 302's and 351's used rail rockers which put tremendous side loads on the valves and wear out the guides, they have lousy ports and small valves, and big chambers to drop the compression. 69 and maybe 70 351w's had bigger valves but that didn't last. The common E7TE heads used on 5.0 Mustangs should be plentiful and cheap, they were also original equipment on 351 trucks in the 90's, that's what the 95 F150 351 I'm building for my Ranger came with. If you can find heads from a 96 Explorer they are GT40 heads with truck springs and they have the 1.84 intake and 1.54 exhaust valves used in 69 351's.
 

Logan95

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Location
Dunnellon Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
2003
Make / Model
Ford
Ford
Transmission
Manual
You will lose compression as the 351 has a larger combustion chamber, the head bolts for the 351 are larger, 1/2 vs 7/16 for the 302 (as you know) which can cause issues with the heads shifting, making them prone to blowing head gaskets.

The big idea with doing it for "performance" was that the 351 had bigger intake valves and so it could flow better, the problem is that with the mistmatched cylinder and intake port/valve you end up lowering intake velocity, and reducing overall performance.

It will work if you need heads cheap to free to get the engine running, but it is a less than ideal setup, and it may cause you issues.

As for the intake, I would think you'd need the 302 intake. The 302 and 351 intakes are different widths because the blocks are different widths, (taller block at the same angle makes a wider top of the V) and the intake width should be determined by block height and angle.
It’ll be temporary as I’m on a tight budget until my daughter is born and my wife is back to work, I might just sell the heads and buy 302 heads
 

Logan95

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
14
Reaction score
2
Points
3
Location
Dunnellon Florida
Vehicle Year
1994
2003
Make / Model
Ford
Ford
Transmission
Manual
They'll bolt on with the right bolts but you don't want them. Mid 70's 302's and 351's used rail rockers which put tremendous side loads on the valves and wear out the guides, they have lousy ports and small valves, and big chambers to drop the compression. 69 and maybe 70 351w's had bigger valves but that didn't last. The common E7TE heads used on 5.0 Mustangs should be plentiful and cheap, they were also original equipment on 351 trucks in the 90's, that's what the 95 F150 351 I'm building for my Ranger came with. If you can find heads from a 96 Explorer they are GT40 heads with truck springs and they have the 1.84 intake and 1.54 exhaust valves used in 69 351's.
I ran GT40P heads on my last 302 ranger with explorer manifolds. Is there any headers you can run with those heads? The manifolds seem pretty restrictive
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,412
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
The "P" heads would be later, 97 at the earliest and they sacrifice some HP for low end torque and emissions reduction. 97 Explorers had the world's crappiest tube headers, the awful 98 manifolds were an improvement. It would be worth looking into building your own headers if no one offers them. 96 Explorer GT40 heads work with ordinary Windsor family headers or manifolds. There are a lot of small chamber/higher compression 289 heads out there but some have tiny valves, which would be OK if you're looking to build low RPM torque and not worried about high revs.
 

decipha

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2013
Messages
56
Reaction score
5
Points
8
Location
New Orleans, LA
Vehicle Year
bunches
Make / Model
too many
Engine Size
take your pick
Transmission
Manual
My credo
decipha
the 351 and the 302 engines are the same. Any ford head for a small block ford is going to be complete garbage. Even the gt40 x/y/p/z etc... heads are all junk. It's not worth wasting the time and effort to swap anything other than an aftermarket head on a sbf.
 

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,053
Reaction score
13,526
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
Someone used to make head bolts to do exactly what you're asking. I don't recall who. They were 7/16" thread with a 1/2" shank.
 

Dirtman

Former Middleweight Moss Fighting Champion
Joined
May 28, 2018
Messages
19,304
Reaction score
13,326
Points
113
Location
41N 75W
Vehicle Year
2009
Engine Type
2.3 (4 Cylinder)
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
It's up there.
Total Drop
It's down there.
Tire Size
Round.
My credo
I poop in the furnace.
the 351 and the 302 engines are the same. Any ford head for a small block ford is going to be complete garbage. Even the gt40 x/y/p/z etc... heads are all junk. It's not worth wasting the time and effort to swap anything other than an aftermarket head on a sbf.
That was helpful... :rolleyes:
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,205
Reaction score
17,520
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
the 351 and the 302 engines are the same. Any ford head for a small block ford is going to be complete garbage. Even the gt40 x/y/p/z etc... heads are all junk. It's not worth wasting the time and effort to swap anything other than an aftermarket head on a sbf.
Depends on what you are doing. For a 4x4 that needs low end torque aftermarket heads are a joke.

But for racing they are far less than ideal, depending on what hp goals are I tend to agree.

I put a wanted ad on craiglist for E7's and like three Mustang guys responded wanting to offload their perfectly good E7's they had replaced with aftermarket heads. $75 later I had a pair of heads.

Aside from the headbolt dia I don't know if there are intake differences or not. The 351W block is wider so a 351W intake will not work.
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
Depends on what you are doing. For a 4x4 that needs low end torque aftermarket heads are a joke.

But for racing they are far less than ideal, depending on what hp goals are I tend to agree.

I put a wanted ad on craiglist for E7's and like three Mustang guys responded wanting to offload their perfectly good E7's they had replaced with aftermarket heads. $75 later I had a pair of heads.

Aside from the headbolt dia I don't know if there are intake differences or not. The 351W block is wider so a 351W intake will not work.
I know a guy who literally has stacks of E7 heads in his shed. Came in handy last December when we were doing head gaskets on his buddy's truck and found a crack between the valves in cylinder 8.
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,412
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
The Explorer GT40 heads on my Mustang allow it to run a 13 second quarter mile on street tires with a relatively mild cam with a reasonable idle and get about 20 mpg on the highway. I'm using mildly ported E7TE heads on my current 351 because the RPM range I want will be lower and I want to keep the port velocity high. The philosophy if enough is good, more is better, and too much is just right doesn't apply to heads, cams, or carburetors unless all you're after is bragging rights.
 

Mac

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
5,103
Reaction score
182
Points
63
Age
77
Location
C. Wisconsin
Vehicle Year
2003
2000
199
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
Those heads if D5TE have the smaller chambers at 60cc, later years were at 69cc.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top