• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

25+mpg 4.0l ohv build


superj

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Messages
3,024
Reaction score
2,497
Points
113
Location
corpus christi, texas
Vehicle Year
2004
Make / Model
ranger edge
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3 liters of tire smoking power
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
none
Total Drop
none
Tire Size
235s
My credo
Grew up in the 70s, 80s, and 90s
when i did megasquirt, back in 2009 or 2010, it was 700 bucks for the ms2 system that you soldered yourself on the desk at home. it was really awesome to do and took me a week after work in the evenings. i believe the make a lot of kits already assembled now for many popular motors so you might be able to get one already built for your truck.

you do need some different sensors, a laptop, and one or two other things in order to use it properly though so you might go over the 1k mark. or see if any are on ebay for cheap
 


Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
471
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
I'm battling with poor gas mileage currently. Stock 93 Ranger XLT Supercab. 4.0 132k miles.
I just did a full tune up, all filters, new wires etc.
I'm still getting a dismal 11mpg city and 16 or so Hwy. Going to replace the 02 sensors for a start. Eventually I may do the Electric Fan. Maybe I'll look into a new MAF etc. What else should I consider? Synthetic Oil...

74512
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaz

DPDISXR4Ti

Active Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
126
Reaction score
33
Points
28
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
I'm battling with poor gas mileage currently.
Do you have a A/F gauge of some sort? They often get dissed since they're not terribly useful as a tuning aid, but what they will tell you is whether closed-loop operation is occurring. If you're not going closed-loop, you'll certainly get decreased fuel mileage.
 

Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
471
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
Do you have a A/F gauge of some sort? They often get dissed since they're not terribly useful as a tuning aid, but what they will tell you is whether closed-loop operation is occurring. If you're not going closed-loop, you'll certainly get decreased fuel mileage.
Thanks, Firstly, What is an AF Gauge and how or where would I actually hook it up to test the loop etc.
 

DPDISXR4Ti

Active Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
126
Reaction score
33
Points
28
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
Thanks, Firstly, What is an AF Gauge and how or where would I actually hook it up to test the loop etc.
 

Roert42

Well-Known Member
RBV's on Boost
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
4,737
Reaction score
4,881
Points
113
Location
Kintersville, PA
Vehicle Year
2011
Make / Model
Ranger XLT
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Something that is also extremely useful for optimal mpg is a vacuum gauge.

a vac gauge could gain you a couple mpg by simply telling you to shift sooner or later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaz

gaz

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
622
Points
113
Location
Wa, Bremerton 98310
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
87Ranger Endrigo 2.9l, 87BII Endrigo 4.0l
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Ranger 5" (2" suspension), BII 4" suspension
Total Drop
Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
Tire Size
Ranger 33"/4:10LS, BII 29"/3:73LS
My credo
Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
*UPDATE*

An unforeseen issue arises;

When I tore down the 1994 Ranger doner OHV 4.0l, I was in such a rush to get the heads to the machinist that I neglected to check which casting they were. As an unforeseen good turn of fate, my machinist and I decided not to mill the heads and just take the compression bump from the 01+ SOHC pistons. As it turns out, that Ranger did not have it's original 94 spec heads; when it was originally rebuild, the mechanic must have sourced and installed 98 spec heads on the 94 block/piston (verified).

So this doner 94 Ranger had a pretty good setup, 94 spec short block with 98 spec heads, running a bit over 10:1.

I am faced with a build I had not intended to take on just yet:
• 94 short block
• 01+ SOHC flat tops 👀
• 98 spec heads 😳

Now the anticipated compression ratio is definitely over 11:1, from what I have read, as high as 11.4:1.

My excitement is now off the charts boy n gils as this will once and for settle the question regarding the use of SOHC flat tops with a 95-98 spec fast burn combustion chamber.

Though I have read that many have accomplished this build, I remain uncertain. Also if memory serves, I only recall builders trying to run it with the 98 PCM. Hopefully, the forgiving nature of the 94 California emissions PCM will love it 🙄
 
Last edited:

Uncle Gump

Token Old Guy
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Messages
13,693
Reaction score
13,149
Points
113
Location
Ottawa IL
Vehicle Year
2006/1986
Make / Model
Ranger/BroncoII
Engine Size
4.0L SOHC/2.9L
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
Lead follow or get out of my way
That's gonna be tough to run on pump unleaded. I would think no way around pump premium at a minimum.

As forgiving as that ECM is... it might not be enough. A stand alone system that you can alter spark and fuel curves would be a better choice.

Good Luck....
 

DPDISXR4Ti

Active Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
126
Reaction score
33
Points
28
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
So this doner 94 Ranger had a pretty good setup, 94 spec short block with 98 spec heads, running a bit over 10:1.
The 4L engine I picked up last year has the same setup. For whatever reason(s), it seems rebuilders like to use the '98 heads with the smaller chambers. FWIW, the guy I got it from claimed he ran it with a stock calibration PCM. That said, it had 24pph injectors in it, so I think he "tuned" it by simply throwing more fuel at it. My plan was to retard the base timing a couple degrees by making the pickup mounts ovalized.

As suggested above however, running a 11.4 C/R engine will present some challenges on pump gas. I don't think you could even "fix" it by timing adjustments. I can't say that for sure - that's just my SWAG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaz

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,052
Reaction score
13,523
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
That sounds like it would be a great engine to run on propane.
 

gaz

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
622
Points
113
Location
Wa, Bremerton 98310
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
87Ranger Endrigo 2.9l, 87BII Endrigo 4.0l
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Ranger 5" (2" suspension), BII 4" suspension
Total Drop
Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
Tire Size
Ranger 33"/4:10LS, BII 29"/3:73LS
My credo
Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
@snoranger ,
I am inclined to feel that you are serious. I have used Rangers on propane and really liked it. I am uncertain where I would put the tank with a BII.
 

gaz

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
622
Points
113
Location
Wa, Bremerton 98310
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
87Ranger Endrigo 2.9l, 87BII Endrigo 4.0l
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Ranger 5" (2" suspension), BII 4" suspension
Total Drop
Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
Tire Size
Ranger 33"/4:10LS, BII 29"/3:73LS
My credo
Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
@Uncle Gump , @DPDISXR4Ti ,
I am leary of the valve clearance with the 98 head and SOHC pistons, so I will try the heads with 94 shallow dish pistons 1st.

I am not leary about 11.4:1 on pump premium, the 2.9l in my Ranger is just under 11.5:1 [typo, corrected from 12.5:1], if I can get even close to well that works, I will be happy. These engines really like compression, as long as there are well cooled.
 
Last edited:

snoranger

Professional money waster
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
RBV's on Boost
ASE Certified Tech
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
13,052
Reaction score
13,523
Points
113
Location
Jackson, NJ
Vehicle Year
'79,'94,'02,'23
Make / Model
All Fords
Engine Type
2.3 EcoBoost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
My credo
I didn't ask for your life story, just answer the question!
@snoranger ,
I am inclined to feel that you are serious. I have used Rangers on propane and really liked it. I am uncertain where I would put the tank with a BII.
I am serious. Propane has an octane rating of around 108… that would work well in an engine running 11:1 compression.
 

DPDISXR4Ti

Active Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
126
Reaction score
33
Points
28
Location
New York
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
I am not leary about 11.4:1 on pump premium, the 2.9l in my Ranger is just under 12.5:1, if I can get even close to well that works, I will be happy. These engines really like compression, as long as there are well cooled.
Thanks for that data-point. It gives me less cause for concern about running the 10:1 yielded by the '98 heads with the stock '94 bottom-end. While you can find anecdotal references to that combination "burning the engine down", they seem to be mostly based on conjecture rather than actual experience.

The other thing to think about for a simple, "tuning, not really tuning" experiments is using different PCM's from different donors. A couple guiding thoughts...
1) A 2WD vehicle should have a slightly more aggressive ignition map than a 4WD
2) An EGR-equipped vehicle should have a slightly more aggressive ignition map than a non-EGR vehicle.
Given that, a 4WD, non-EGR donor would have the most mild ignition map, which is what you would want to start with on a higher (than stock) compression engine. Fortunately, that should be an easy PCM to locate. I'm assuming 2WD 4.0's are few and far between. I don't recall ever coming across one in the junkyard.
 

gaz

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
1,382
Reaction score
622
Points
113
Location
Wa, Bremerton 98310
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
87Ranger Endrigo 2.9l, 87BII Endrigo 4.0l
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Ranger 5" (2" suspension), BII 4" suspension
Total Drop
Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
Tire Size
Ranger 33"/4:10LS, BII 29"/3:73LS
My credo
Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
@DPDISXR4Ti ,

All of my mechanical mentors have agreed on this point, exactly the same way; naturally aspirated engines, running up to 13.5:1 compression ratio on pump premium, no need for concern of detonation but measures should be employed to manage the extra heat:
• engine oil cooler
• improved top end oiling
• increased engine oil capacity
• 1 or 2 heat ranges cooler spark plugs
• reducing unnecessary engine loads
• increased radiator cooling capacity
• lower temps under the hood
 
Last edited:

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top